| reply to hm
Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued said by hm :Now that both Voltage and CIPPIC replied,
Voltage has replied ?
Where, when ? |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| said by JohnDohnut :said by hm :Now that both Voltage and CIPPIC replied,
Voltage has replied ? Where, when ? Voltage objected to CIPPIC's intervention. CIPPIC responded to the objection.
»www.teksavvy.com/en/why-teksavvy···ormation
Newer stuff at the top, older stuff at the bottom.
Voltage's response is 1 of 2 and 1 of 2
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
| So any news this week?
I believe this is now week 3 since voltage complained to the court that there are still TSI IP's that must stop sharing because of the great financial harm they are creating by this "commercial distribution".
TSI was order to send the notice out upon receipt of the Voltage draft.
So.. um.. have these voltage vultures given TSI a draft yet? Anyone know?
Has the new Email gone out yet?
Marc, any news on anything? |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| I posted an update in the TSI thread, but I'll repost here:
On Monday, the case was released to have CIPPIC's motion to intervene decided. No clue as to time frame.
Yesterday Judge Mandamin (the judge who recommended a 1 day special hearing for hearing the evidence), wrapped up a major case - most likely the major case he stated he thought would get in the way of him being able to take over the Voltage case.
Its very possible that now that Judge Mandamin's case is resolved, he will take over the Voltage case.
I assume there's still no email out, as frankly they want people sharing it - more people to sue.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
| said by resa1983:I assume there's still no email out, as frankly they want people sharing it - more people to sue.
If there's no Email by tomorrow then CIPPIC is going to have call bullshit on voltage. As well as TSI's lawyers.
3 weeks is more than enough. |
|
|
|
 TwiztedZeroNine Zero Burp Nine SixPremium
join:2011-03-31
Toronto, ON
kudos:3 | Plus theres this : Distributel is now FIGHTING the court order to disclose their customer information!
So I guess theres more action afoot - On other fronts. |
|
| And south of the border...
"IP Address Snapshots Not Sufficient Evidence To File Infringement Suit; Prenda Lawyer Faces Sanctions... In a lengthy order that reads more like a smackdown, Wright attacks Gibb's abuse of the legal system and thoroughly dismantles his so-called "business model.""
»www.techdirt.com/articles/201302···ns.shtml |
|
 hm
@videotron.ca | said by bullwinkle:And south of the border...
"IP Address Snapshots Not Sufficient Evidence To File Infringement Suit; Prenda Lawyer Faces Sanctions... In a lengthy order that reads more like a smackdown, Wright attacks Gibb's abuse of the legal system and thoroughly dismantles his so-called "business model.""
»www.techdirt.com/articles/201302···ns.shtml
That's quite a nice analogy the judge makes.
This snapshot allegedly shows that the Defendants were downloading the copyrighted work—at least at that moment in time. But downloading a large file like a video takes time; and depending on a user’s Internet-connection speed, it may take a long time. In fact, it may take so long that the user may have terminated the download. The user may have also terminated the download for other reasons. To allege copyright infringement based on an IP snapshot is akin to alleging theft based on a single surveillance camera shot: a photo of a child reaching for candy from a display does not automatically mean he stole it. No Court would allow a lawsuit to be filed based on that amount of evidence... .... |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to Gorgonzola
said by Gorgonzola :So any news this week?
I believe this is now week 3 since voltage complained to the court that there are still TSI IP's that must stop sharing because of the great financial harm they are creating by this "commercial distribution".
Marc, I believe this now makes it one month.
Any news at all?
Get the draft yet to send to people? |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:15 | Still no draft. |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | :/
Ty For the reply Marc.. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to TSI Marc
Not surprising. We all know they don't want people to stop sharing, cuz it means they might be able to sue more people.
That would be a good thing to bring up during the next hearing.. lol.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | said by resa1983:That would be a good thing to bring up during the next hearing.. lol.
OoOoOhH I'm sure they will.
heh
It shows volumes. |
|
TSI MarcPremium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:15 | We highlighted similar behavior in court last time... I.e. they could have asked for this at any time since the beginning..
--
Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| said by TSI Marc:We highlighted similar behavior in court last time... I.e. they could have asked for this at any time since the beginning..
Especially considering they wrote the original letter that went out to customers.. They could have added it to that.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
TSI MarcPremium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:15 | Exactly! |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to TSI Marc
Yup. I recall the lawyer bringing that up. Think he even raised his voice at them if I recall right.
Yet, they continue to not bother... |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | The link/PDF:
CIPPIC Intervenor Status Granted
»www.teksavvy.com/Media/Default/C···nted.PDF |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to hm
It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).
»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6784/125/
Coincidence? I think not. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Bell Fibe
 ·ELECTRONICBOX
| said by hm :It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).
»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6784/125/
Coincidence? I think not.
wow lol |
|
