 scelliNative New YorkerPremium
join:1999-08-07
FLOT/FEBA
kudos:1 | reply to AVD
Re: [419] my brother got a check today..... said by AVD:Ignorance that the check is a fraud =/= ignorance of the law
Are you agreeing or disagreeing that a person should be held responsible?
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters! |
|
 AVDRespice, Adspice, ProspicePremium
join:2003-02-06
Onion, NJ
kudos:1 | said by scelli:said by AVD:Ignorance that the check is a fraud =/= ignorance of the law
Are you agreeing or disagreeing that a person should be held responsible? I'm just saying your position about ignorance of the law is not relevant.
--
* seek help if having trouble coping
--Standard disclaimers apply.-- |
|
scelliNative New YorkerPremium
join:1999-08-07
FLOT/FEBA
kudos:1 | said by AVD:said by scelli:said by AVD:Ignorance that the check is a fraud =/= ignorance of the law
Are you agreeing or disagreeing that a person should be held responsible? I'm just saying your position about ignorance of the law is not relevant. Then I will defer to the more nuanced response offered by peterboro.
Either way you cut it: A person who knowingly/unknowingly breaks the law by cashing a check that proves to be fraudulent had better be able to explain the reasons for their actions. It's called being held accountable for one's own actions, a trait sadly lacking these days in a society where all too many individuals are devoid of such an understanding.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters! |
|
