pandoraPremium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1 | Is onstar used by many? I'm uncertain how many people use onstar. Is this a big deal??
--
Congress could mess up a one piece jigsaw puzzle. |
|
 elios
join:2005-11-15
Springfield, MO | yea its pretty well used
the big news is AT&T's crap network and coverage
|
|
ssavoyPremium
join:2007-08-16
Dallas, PA | Stop beating a dead horse. |
|
 xdeadhead220, 221, Whatever It Takes.Premium
join:2000-11-08
Mechanicsburg, PA | truth hurts, eh? |
|
ssavoyPremium
join:2007-08-16
Dallas, PA | Ignoring the fact AT&T has better coverage in my market....they had crews adding LTE to the tower near my house this morning. |
|
xdeadhead220, 221, Whatever It Takes.Premium
join:2000-11-08
Mechanicsburg, PA | your market? like anyone but you gives a crap about your market. |
|
Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| Personally, I see this more of a global technology change than a 'AT&T is better than VZW'.
Why -
VZW does have LTE 'and' CDMA to cover the vast majority of the country
AT&T has GSM / UMTS / LTE to cover the majority of the country.
On a global scale - I suspect that GM is abandonning CDMA chipset completely for any new products. As VZW hasn't completed LTE, and GSM/UMTS is by far the largest footprint on the planet ( »www.4gamericas.org/index.cfm?fus···geid=565 ) moving to an all GSM/UMTS/LTE based deployment does make sense - even if it happens to end up on AT&T. |
|
 N3OGHYo Soy Col. "Bat" GuanoPremium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1 | reply to ssavoy
said by ssavoy:Stop beating a dead horse.
But, but dead horse is de-LISH in things like British frozen lasagna, Irish hamburgers & Ikea meatballs.
He's just tenderizing 
--
Petty people are disproportionally corrupted by petty power |
|
 LinklistPremium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5
1 edit | reply to pandora
said by pandora:I'm uncertain how many people use onstar. Is this a big deal??
Plenty use Onstar. And coverage for AT&T is pretty decent around the country. Verizon may be a little better, but I bet Verizon wanted GM to pay a lot more than GM did to AT&T. Competition at work - AT&T no doubt offered a better deal.
--
I will be perfectly happy if the budget cuts specified in the Budget Control Act go into effect. 3 cheers for the sequester. Take the money from the drunken federal spenders. |
|
 TomS_Git-r-donePremium,MVM
join:2002-07-19
London, UK
kudos:4 | reply to N3OGH
You didnt just go there.... lol  |
|
| reply to en103
AT&T lover right above ^, caution you will get flamed... startin 1, 2, 3..
alright haha, lets see AT&T and Verizon are crap.. idc how much they cover the country.. they are and have been a duopoly, AT&T is acting like they use to in ma-bell.. corrupting the government to get what they want.. even if it costs consumers..
One day AT&T and Verizon wont be the big dogs.. then you will see real competition! |
|
|
|
 Anonymous_AnonymousPremium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to elios
said by elios:yea its pretty well used
the big news is AT&T's crap network and coverage
good news car does not have limitation on the battery so it will not be a real issue
--
Well, does your car at least turn into something else? Sometimes I turn it into a trashcan. Hmm... |
|
 joakoPremium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5 | reply to elios
The onboard telematics on my vehicle use Verizon. And I constantly drive around and the red no service light turns on all the while my AT&T phone continues to have reception.
--
PRescott7-2097 |
|
