dbarc
join:2000-01-22
Fort Wayne, IN
| reply to BrianDamage
Re: Don't cater to more corporate cry-babies
said by BrianDamage:
Well, if I read the article right, the satellite companies are operating in or around 2400 mghz (or 2.4 ghz) and this is UNLICENSED spectrum.
Correct me if I am wrong concerning their operational spectrum, but I think I read it right.
Ok. Yes, it is incorrect. They do NOT operate in the unlicensed spectrum but in licensed spectrum that they obtained from the FCC and licensed to them. The 'operating IN or AROUND' is a big difference. They don't operate IN the unlicensed spectrum, but their licensed frequencies are AROUND, ie. close, to the unlicensed spectrum.
That said, I don't agree in any way what they are attempting to do. They need to develop their radios and directional antenna to reject off band transmissions much more than they do according to some engineers reports. If there ARE some devices in the unlicensed spectrum that are causing major spurious transmissions in other bands, then they, and they alone, should have their equipment adjusted and modified just as any manufacture of equipment capable of transmitting would be required to do. But to change the entire specs of the unlicensed spectrum is absurd. That's like a holder of one license saying that if harmonics from any other transmission interfere with their frequency, no matter if they do nothing to prevent the interruption in their (the license holders) equipment to reject them, then everyone has to modify or recall their equipment. (And they'd probably be holding their equipment 2 inches from the antenna of the supposedly offending equipment.)
What has me scratching my head is that this is coming up now. If I recall correctly, they aren't claiming there's a problem now, but there would be as more use the frequency in the future. Why didn't think think of this before when they were designing their own equipment or when they bid for licenses? They may say (and I believe have said) that there wasn't much in the 2.4 ghz band used at the time.. But that doesn't seem to fly. They had the history of the 900mhz unlicensed spectrum and that went gangbusters with wireless devices. It seems they should (being the operative word) have taken the nearby unlicensed spectrum into consideration from day one. IMHO, this seems more like poor planning and now trying to get out of it after spending hundreds of millions. I'd personally think they'd be better off trying to get some subscribers with what must be a huge burn rate on cash at this point. If they don't they'll go under and not have to worry about anybody causing interference from any frequencies. |
|
BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs: 
| Thanks for pointing those points out. I agree with you.
I think it's ridiculous also to try to make up for shortcomings in design engineering in your own equipment by trying to force regulatory agencies to force others to modify theirs.
It's moronic.
--
We've got our eye on the firmaments, our hand on the armaments, our heads full of arguments, and words for our monuments..... |
|
sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| Even though it is licensed, the whole thing shows you how moronic the FCC is. You have an existing "unlicensed" spectrum that you *know* will be "dirty" (full of cheap consumer equipment that shoots out harmonics beyond the center frequency) and someone comes along looking for some space in the "2GHz neighborhood"... So they give them something exactly adjacent to the unlicensed band. Duh.
Kind of like being the proud recipient of the band right above the CB band... "Here's 28MHz, have fun! Don't mind the trucker over there shooting out a kilowatt at 27MHz!"... |
|
BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs:
| Yeah, but is there anybody in the FCC contacting all the CB radio manufacturers in order to have them redesign all their equipment in order to satisfy the inadequacies of another vendor's equipment, just because this manufacturer whined to Powell about it?
I think not.
If the FCC allows this to happen, then it would just be another example of how "in the pocket" guys like Powell can be.
It's corporate tea-bagging.
--
We've got our eye on the firmaments, our hand on the armaments, our heads full of arguments, and words for our monuments..... |
|
