Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Time Warner Threatens Wi-Fi Sharers » What are the terms of the contract?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The BIG difference that everyone is ignoring. »
« How much do you want to bet...  
AuthorAll Replies


BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs:

reply to boogie74
Re: What are the terms of the contract?

I see the "legalese" point of view.
I suggest that people more closely read terms of service before signing on.
But, specific clarification of the vagueness of these same terms of service would also serve to clear a lot of this mess up before it even starts.
Consumer protections need to be preserved, also.
Also, something these carriers should realize also is that when you lock in consumers to long contracts for broadband or any other service, then it becomes the workable option for longer periods, thereby necessitating the need for the service to be expandable.
If a customer wishes to network off of the connection, he should not be penalized.
But, the forces at work here are such that because competition is such a a far cry from what it was even a year ago, with fewer and fewer providers, means that the ones that remain see that they can impose these regulations on customers that they would not have been able to before because too much competition exists.
So I say, when competition, and I mean true competition, is allowed (legislatively and politically) to make a real comeback, you will see these crazy restrictions much more specific and less prohibitive in content.
Current atmosphere in the good ol' US of A makes all of this possible.
--
We've got our eye on the firmaments, our hand on the armaments, our heads full of arguments, and words for our monuments.....

NGOwner

join:2000-11-21
Leawood, KS

said by BrianDamage:
I see the "legalese" point of view.
I suggest that people more closely read terms of service before signing on.
How much clearer does it need to be?

5. Subscriber Conduct.

(a) The ISP Service as offered and provided under this Agreement is a residential service offered for personal, non-commercial use only. Subscriber will not resell or redistribute (whether for a fee or otherwise) the ISP Service, or any portion thereof, or otherwise charge others to use the ISP Service, or any portion thereof. Subscriber agrees not to use the ISP Service for operation as an internet service provider, for the hosting of websites (other than as expressly permitted as part of the ISP Service) or for any enterprise purpose whether or not the enterprise is directed toward making a profit.

Source: »help.twcable.com/html/twc_sub_agreement.html

If you are going to set up a Wi-Fi network, you better make damn sure that you are the only one able to access it.

[NG]Owner
--
It is impossible to create an idiot-proof product. Humanity is simply too adept at churning out better idiots.


BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs:


That's pretty clear.
That's also why I said that folks should actually read the TOS before signing on.
However, a point I was trying to make is that this TOS for example, is far too restrictive as to how the service is used.
But, because of lack of choices, people will sign on and then abuse the service sometimes, even if the provider has suffered no real repercussions from it, which in this case, they haven't.
Choice an competition would help to put a real dent in this kind of behavior, because if there was real competition, then companies are far less likely to have such restrictive provisions in their TOS in order to lure the most customers.
This is just another effect of monopoly of the broadband market, but I am not trying to cast off those who would just steal anyway.
Some people will always steal things.
These corporations are not beyond it either. I think this case is still mostly about greed and nothing else.
[text was edited by author 2002-07-01 17:00:26]
Forums » Time Warner Threatens Wi-Fi SharersThe BIG difference that everyone is ignoring. »
« How much do you want to bet...  


Thursday, 03-Dec 03:57:34 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [97] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [66] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [40] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Linksys Gateway Mode vs Router Mode [Linksys]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· PVP in wow today [World of Warcraft]
· Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here [Comcast HSI]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]