wzoo1
join:2001-06-28
MI, USA
|  this is going to suck... :(
| |
|
 
BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs: 
| Re: this is going to suck... :( For one, it is not the the FCC that is doing it, it is the FTC. Read more closely.
Secondly, opening their facilities was part of the agreement of the AOL/TW merger, from what I understand.
--
The only human truth is that we live and we die. Everything in between those events is open to interpretation. | |
|
dontworry
@24.74.x.x
| Don't sweat it too much buddy. I'm in Charlotte and we had to open our lines to Earthlink, AOL, and Max.inter.net and the service still rocks....the download and upload caps were put into place to help with the worries that you expressed. If push comes to shove and the service degrades; TWC just pops in another node to handle the load in that area. That's something DSL can't do......It'll be fine. | |
|
 | 
jhboricua
ExMod 2000-01
join:2000-06-06
Minneapolis, MN
clubs:
| Re: this is going to suck... :( said by dontworry:
If push comes to shove and the service degrades; TWC just pops in another node to handle the load in that area. That's something DSL can't do.
Clarify this please. The way I see it is actually easier to do this with a dsl setup than with a cable setup. With dsl the capacity augmentation is done only at the CO. With cable, adding a node involves working at the street level and depending how good/bad the network was designed it may involve having to run more underground lines thru the street to feed the new node, correct me if I'm wrong.
--
"Look, If I warm up my breasts with my hands, do you think they'll get bigger or smaller?" - Asuka on the subject of thermal expansion | |
|
tomsprat
Draw Me A "Cold One"
Premium,ExMod 2002-04
join:2000-11-03
Fort Lauderdale, FL
clubs:
| quote:
This is going to suck...
No, in fact it's a good thing. New customers would have signed up with TW anyway, so the customer base won't significantly increase simply because there are additional providers. Now there will be increased competition for service, which should help to keep prices down, and services up.
--
The glass is neither half-empty, nor is it half-full; it is merely twice the size required to contain the liquid elements therein. | |
|
|
wzoo1
join:2001-06-28
MI, USA
| You are WRONG!!! Time Warner owns the cable broadband nodes and they can handle up to loads of users... If they time warner was to install more nodes, they just install the node right near the old node from the same cable... The transfer between a cable headquarters where its sending the signal to the node is actually fiber optic. The node coverts fiber signal into coax signal for cable tv and cable modems! | |
|
|
BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs:
| Re: this is going to suck... :( Learn what you are talking about.
What you are describing is a headend, and capacity augmentation will require more cable when the existing capacity on existing cable is exhausted.
Also, don't comment on DSL when you obviously know nothing about it.
Perhaps you should stick to your area of experience....games.
Leave broadband service delivery to those who have a clue about it.
[text was edited by author 2002-07-17 14:34:27] | |
|
DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX
| Time Warner already did this in Texas. You can have Earthlink over TimerWarner cable in addition to TW/RR. TW still controls the pipe and backbone connection and the RF network single handedly. The only difference is who assigns your IP and which email/news server you use, web space, dial roaming etc. Other ISP's have the same bandwidth caps, same routing, same port blocking as TW/RR.
[text was edited by author 2002-07-17 16:09:48] | |
|
JakCrow
join:2001-12-06
Palo Alto, CA
| Having other ISPs on the cable network isn't going to affect your service at all. The other ISPs will be separate from your bandwidth limited, piece of crap RR service. You don't have to worry about other companies ruining your cable internet, TW is quite capable of doing that itself. | |
|
|
DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX
| Re: this is going to suck... :( No, they share the same RF network and backbone connection is still provided by RR. Basically, this is a re-marketing ploy. It is very similar to those dial-up ISP's that use the modem banks of AT&T, Worldcom, Level3 etc. and only provide the email etc. services and bill you.
However, since the same customer will not be listed twice on the node who cares if the customer is getting service from Earthlink or RR in terms of bandwidth use it will be the same. And the prices are plus or minus equal as well. | |
|
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
| said by wzoo1:
This is going to suck... I currently have Roadrunner which is high speed internet cable modem service direct from Time Warner and it's excellent right now! Since time warner is opening its cable lines/broadband lines and letting other ISPS use time warners HFC network, then ALL OUR CABLE MODEM SERVICE WILL DEGRADE AND GET WORSE!!! THIS IS SERIOUSLY A BAD IDEA!!! I dont agree with this and WHY IS THE FCC DOING THIS??? Serisouly, Time Warner controls and owns the cable lines and cable modem broadband lines and why should it give it to other isps???
Its not going to suck anymore than it already does. If people cant get roadrunner they cant get it through any competing ISP's using their lines. And remember AOL/TW still owns the wire therefore controls the speeds. opening their lines to others only opens the ability to fingerpoint. | |
|
vallis
join:2002-08-08
Raynham, MA
| Well I (at$t bb user) have officially been capped. My download/upload speeds were capped from 1500/300 to 600/100. In other words, the average 150-200kbs i used to get is now 50-60kbs. This is a warning to all at&t bb users around Massachusetts to switch to some other company! Nuff said. | |
|
|
|
|
·
·