Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » OS X x86? » Interesting
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


C0deZer0
Oc'D To Rhythm And Police
Premium
join:2001-10-03
Davenport, FL
·Verizon Online DSL

 Interesting

i for one think that it's good that Apple is deciding to keep its options open, but if there is a move for Apple to have its OS on x86 architecture, I could only begin to wonder how much of a pain it will be for re-developing apps and such for the new OS and platform. it'll probably be none too dissimilar (if not more severe) than the switch from the 68k processors to the PowerPC G* series.

though if Apple did go x86, I hope they choose AMD over Intel. I could already foresee a lot of swearing if they tried having it on the P4 since AMD is still following with the "improve IPC and mhz" principle that should've stayed in place. Not to mention, I think most everyone knows that for most everything, Apple's G4 (clock-for-clock) would cream a Pentium4. hell, clock-for-clock the original Pentium would beat a P4 (at RC5), apparently

After all, all they say in there is that it's just a way of keeping the options open. And I do think that it bites that Motorola has such a choke-hold on the progress for the Apple architecture right now.
--
Everything AOL touches just plain sucks. End of Story!


Gomez
The Pool's In But The Patio Ain't Dry
Premium,Mod
join:2001-02-21
Atlanta, GA
clubs:

Host:
Pub Games
From an engineering standpoint it's probably no big deal to build it for x86. Most of the altivec optimized code likely started as C, and build directives control the target of the build. I'm pretty sure a very senior engineer could demo aqua on X86 or Caruso or pretty much any chipset as gcc is a good cross compiler.

The issue at hand is not an engineering one, it's a business one. DVD encryption was broken in what a day? Name any Windows app with mass appeal that there isn't a crack for. Cracking X86 technology is actually a competition if you know the dark corners of the net to watch it unfold.

Apple is a hardware company. They happen to have an awesome Software offering to sell said product. I stand firm on my opinion that throwing that IP in the shark infested waters of X86 is suicide.
--
"There are 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary numbers and those that do not."
Forums » OS X x86?


Friday, 21-Nov 20:39:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [198] Obama FCC Selection Team Won't Make AT&T Happy
· [106] DSL's Not Dead Yet
· [84] Zone Alarm Pro Free Just For Today
· [80] Harvard Law Professor Sues RIAA
· [74] Storm Reviews Come Rolling In
· [67] New Xbox 360 'Experience' Goes Live
· [67] CRTC Rules Against Indie ISPs In Throttling Dispute
· [52] Just 26% of U.S. Broadband Users Faster Than 5Mbps
· [51] Cable Grabbing 71% Of New Broadband Customers
· [48] Comcast DOCSIS 3.0 Hits Pacific Northwest In December
Most people now reading
· CRTC ruling coming Thursday Nov 20 [TekSavvy]
· [Rant] Spelling on the Internet [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· [WotLK] Championing explained [World of Warcraft]
· [iPhone] 2.2 out now [All things Macintosh]
· Pentagon Hit by Unprecedented Cyber Attack [Security]
· Webmail now has adverts? [Rogers]
· We're not endorsing internet throttling: CRTC [TekSavvy]
· Appliance repair bill question. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [Scam] Colbert & Johnson [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Rocky - time to offer VPN service to all your customers [TekSavvy]