Post here the ping times to your gateway

dsaliem
Arrested Development
Premium
join:2002-07-17
Visalia, CA

reply to ChuC
Re: Post here the ping times to your gateway

Here is the ping time to attbi gateway @ IP 10.242.240.1

C:\>ping -n 10 10.242.240.1

Pinging 10.242.240.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.242.240.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 10.242.240.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 11ms

C:\>time
The current time is: 14:08:53.65 Visalia, CA
[text was edited by author 2002-09-30 19:47:48]

[text was edited by author 2002-09-30 19:49:49]

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-30 17:10:37 · (locked)

cury19

join:2002-09-02
Weatogue, CT

reply to ChuC
Pinging 12.243.112.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.112.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Ping statistics for 12.243.112.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 11ms

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-30 16:44:22 · (locked)

airwingjim
Euclid314
Premium
join:2001-08-05
Denver, CO

reply to ChuC
»/quality/nil/875720

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-30 07:48:51 · (locked)

pheebau

join:2001-12-12
El Cerrito, CA

reply to ChuC
Wow - el cerrito, ca - Monday 3am

Something must have happened!

Pinging 12.233.156.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.233.156.1:
Packets: Sent = 27, Received = 27, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 11ms

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-30 05:43:31 · (locked)

INHCNN

join:2001-12-15
Lansing, MI

reply to ChuC
Pinging 12.245.205.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.245.205.1: bytes=32 time=728ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.245.205.1: bytes=32 time=758ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.245.205.1: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.245.205.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.245.205.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 758ms, Average = 550ms

The current time is: 10 52 53.93

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-29 10:53:44 · (locked)

SlyBry
Slyest Of All The Brys
Premium
join:2002-08-26
Manchester, NH

reply to ChuC
I guess I still can't complain...

Pinging 24.147.72.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.147.72.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 24.147.72.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 5ms, Average = 2ms

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-29 02:02:50 · (locked)

lordie
My new year resolution is 1080P

join:2001-11-13
Sunnyvale, CA

·Comcast

·Skype

reply to ChuC
Sunnyvale Ca (Bay Area)

C:\>ping 12.234.160.1 -t

Pinging 12.234.160.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time10ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time10ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.234.160.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 12.234.160.1:
Packets: Sent = 31, Received = 31, Lost = 0 (0%
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 63ms, Average = 26ms

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-29 01:33:58 · (locked)

Illiniwek
Go Illini

join:2002-08-19
Draper, UT
clubs:

reply to ChuC
Chicago Area...

Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.251.226.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.251.226.1:
Packets: Sent = 9, Received = 9, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 8ms

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-29 00:41:06 · (locked)

Chip
Premium
join:2001-12-23
Connecticut

reply to ChuC
C:\>ping 12.243.108.129

Pinging 12.243.108.129 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.243.108.129: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.108.129: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.108.129: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.108.129: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.243.108.129:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 14ms, Average = 9ms
--
Elevators smell different to midgets.

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-28 19:12:56 · (locked)

moofather

join:2000-10-05
Mechanicsville, VA

reply to ChuC
I have the greatest cable ever. I'm on a counter-strike team that placed 13-16th at the last CPL. I will be fully prepared this winter at the next event. Thanks ATTBI.

1 66 ms 111 ms 141 ms 10.226.136.1

1 26 ms 36 ms 451 ms 10.226.136.1

3 283 ms 36 ms 403 ms 10.226.136.1

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-28 15:20:24 · (locked)

gpurv

join:2000-10-16
Garland, TX
clubs:

reply to ChuC
C:\>ping -n 10 12.237.194.1

Pinging 12.237.194.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.237.194.1: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.237.194.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 65ms, Average = 35ms
[text was edited by author 2002-09-28 15:06:58]

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-28 15:06:20 · (locked)

pheebau

join:2001-12-12
El Cerrito, CA

reply to ChuC
Saturday 9/28/2002 at 11:30am - EL CERRITO, CA

Pinging 12.233.156.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.233.156.1: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.233.156.1:
Packets: Sent = 31, Received = 31, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 242ms, Average = 65ms

Always those spikes - why going from 10ms to 242ms - what's the reason? upstreams? it is better from what I've been seeing in the last 4 weeks but still those pings can go high during the week-end and guess what *not* during the week...

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-28 14:30:33 · (locked)

CherryIcee
Winter

join:2001-10-25
Bellevue, WA

reply to ChuC

Here's mine.
[text was edited by author 2002-09-27 16:01:42]

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 15:59:27 · (locked)

Al Kolka
Premium
join:2002-08-30
Livermore, CA

reply to ChuC
Pinging 10.145.32.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Ping statistics for 10.145.32.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 8, Lost = 2 (20% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 7ms

For about 10 days this has been my experience: decent ping times except for the lost packets.

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 11:20:56 · (locked)

pplchamp1
Great One
Premium
join:2002-01-25
East Hartford, CT

reply to ChuC
Pinging 12.243.105.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.243.105.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.243.105.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 12ms
--
I ain't got time to bleed!

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 09:01:05 · (locked)

americanada
VIP
join:2001-12-19
Covina, CA

reply to ChuC
Covina, CA...Rockin' right along as usual

C:\Documents and Settings>ping 24.130.xxx.1

Pinging 24.130.162.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 24.130.xxx.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.130.xxx.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.130.xxx.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 24.130.xxx.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 24.130.xxx.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 7ms
--
Anything I say not directly related to a customer's Pipeline service in CA/NV is strictly my own opinion, and not that of my employer, Charter Communications.

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 04:19:31 · (locked)

Revcb
Orbis non sufficit
Premium,Mod
join:2001-07-05
Springport, MI

Host:
AT&T Broadband
Michigan
VOIP Tech Chat

reply to ChuC
Pinging 12.***.***.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 12.***.***.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 12.***.***.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 9ms, Average = 8ms
--
I do whatever the little voices in my head tell me to do.
[text was edited by author 2002-09-27 03:41:01]

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 03:39:33 · (locked)

The_Tinkerer$
Cast From The Darkness

join:2001-12-31
Denver, CO

reply to Nohope
I've seen snails move faster.....

said by Nohope :

Pinging 12.231.18.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3378ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3236ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3295ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3172ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 12.231.18.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 3172ms, Maximum = 3378ms, Average = 3270ms

Gahhh...I don't know about any saturation, but those are HORRIBLE! I wonder what it looks like from the other end going down TO the modem. If it shows slowdown at what appears to be the modem, then I'd be for scheduling a service call for sure, so that way they can FIX it.
--
Yes, I am at the mothership of AT&T, but am merely a mortal, not a magician. Anything I say is not to be construed as an "official" company standpoint.

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 03:23:20 · (locked)

Nohope

join:2001-12-01
Seattle, WA

reply to ChuC
Re: Post here the ping times to your gateway

Have to love ATT......They are saturating the router in my area. All pings to anywhere are horrible. Even first hop.....*sigh*

Pinging 12.231.18.1 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3378ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3236ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3295ms TTL=254
Reply from 12.231.18.1: bytes=32 time=3172ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 12.231.18.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 3172ms, Maximum = 3378ms, Average = 3270ms

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 02:55:28 · (locked)

bluebottle$
Premium
join:2002-09-04
Richmond, CA

reply to ChuC
Ping statistics for 12.232.176.1:
Packets: Sent = 44, Received = 44, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 396ms, Average = 142ms

11:05 PM Thursday, 9/26 > San Francisco/Bay Area

My usual pings--it's always like this!!
--
"That's some catch, that Catch-22," Yossarian observed. "It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed.

to forum · permalink · 2002-09-27 02:09:46 · (locked)


Saturday, 05-Dec 04:52:49	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. republican-creole page compression OFF