Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The Site » Old Forums » Sprint ION » Is the Sprint Biz DSL discontinuation legal?
Uniqs:
101
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
NYC now Sprint elects to continue BizDSL »
« I'm on speakesy now  
phrider

join:1999-12-17
Los Angeles, CA

Is the Sprint Biz DSL discontinuation legal?

Some seasoned observers of the FCC were very surprised by Sprint's failure to file a Section 214 application with the FCC to discontinue the Sprint Business DSL service in LA, Chicago, Austin, and elsewhere. After all, the Sprint Business DSL service is/ was primarily a straight CLEC service on Sprint DSLAMs and leased ILEC lines, with typical ISP services added ala carte. Sprint is the CLEC for this service -- and CLEC's must file Section 214 applications to discontinue service. Remember Rhythms, who had to keep going in spite of bankruptcy?

This has probably caused consternation at a number of levels in the FCC. And it should be cause for serious concern by all DSL users. If Sprint can appear to violate FCC rules by ignoring Section 214 rules, who's next? And on what issue?

We've been denied due process -- and an important forum to get public consideration of the problems that have caused the collapse of the DSL market. Now, in my PacBell area, no one offers full rate ADSL at the maximum spec rate of 8 Mb down / 1 Mb up. Why not? Why is a major player abandoning this market? They cited ILEC abuse when quitting ION, and hinted at it for Business DSL. Shouldn't the FCC be investigating these issues (especially before granting the ILECs further privileges)?

If you want to make your voice officially heard, see »www.fcc.gov/cgb/complaintfiling.html for the FCC complaint process. Failure to speak up may cost you your rights later as well as now.

If you have not been discontinued yet, but have been given the "not to FCC-standard" notice from Sprint, like the folks in Seattle, speak up FAST!
tomas3168

join:2002-05-01
Denver, CO

Re: Is the Sprint Biz DSL discontinuation legal?

I was looking at the FCC site that contains the 214 filings, and noticed that you only file a 214 when discontinuing telecommunications services. On ion's 214 filed on Nov 16 of last year it states "Applicant explains that ION is an integrated service consisting of both common carrier local and long distance telecommunications services, as well
as Internet access data service."

ANAL, but would dsl discontinuance require a 214 since it is separate and distinct from "telecommunications"? Maybe we wont see a 214 filed? just my thoughts.

No voice service was included with Bizdsl, so they wouldnt have to file a 214.
phrider

join:1999-12-17
Los Angeles, CA

Re: Is the Sprint Biz DSL discontinuation legal?

It's a telecommunication service. Rhythms had to file before discontinuance. So did others.

"Seasoned FCC observers were surprised..."
tomas3168

join:2002-05-01
Denver, CO
"Applicant explains that ION is an integrated service consisting of both common carrier local and long distance telecommunications services, as well as Internet access data service."

Its an internet access data service.
phrider

join:1999-12-17
Los Angeles, CA

Re: Is the Sprint Biz DSL discontinuation legal?

It's a telecommunication service, long established. My line tag from PacBell says "Sprint Communications" on it.... they're the data CLEC plain and simple, just like Covad or Rhythms (was). This is not new news, but very old ground.

Darkflight
3G Stitch626

join:2001-03-03
Rowland Heights, CA

Now if you go on a side tangent, some of you will also remember that WorldCon bankruptcy had people asking Mr. Powell about what the FCC could do to prevent the shutdown of UUnet. In one hand he says, yes we can stop them from shutdown, but on the other hand he said he could not...

Similiar situation folks.

[I know, old thread, but had to bring it up b4 i forgot]
--
Darkflight- Have you seen where my bandwidth went lately?
phrider

join:1999-12-17
Los Angeles, CA

Re: Is the Sprint Biz DSL discontinuation legal?

Remember Rhythms? They were in Chapter 11 bankruptcy and were required to keep operating until the discontinuance process was complete.

It sure looks like Sprint violated Federal Regs by discontinuing service without filing....
Forums » The Site » Old Forums » Sprint IONNYC now Sprint elects to continue BizDSL »
« I'm on speakesy now  


Monday, 30-Nov 17:27:01 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [36] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [26] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [20] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [19] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [14] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Portable power for blackouts? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [Internet] Gaming problem for "Heroes of Newerth" ( New bell Upd [Bell Canada]
· Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents [Canadian Chat]
· Fun screwing with PuG raids. [World of Warcraft]
· filling an in-ground pool [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Wind getting a little more aggressive [TekSavvy]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]