djdnz
join:2002-08-16 | reply to InFloW
Re: 1 AM Peak Hour?
I also live near Vez, and last night we were playing CS and the pings were pathetic. They would go from 70 (the server was in texas) to like 500 out of nowhere at around 10:00-12:00.
Hope they can do something about it. |
|
bstephens
join:2002-10-09
Belleville, ON
| I'm in Belleville Lippy and there is deffinetly a problem here with my speed. In the mornings to afternoon I get around 419KB/Sec (I'm on the Pro package for now)
At night around 6:00pm to 11:45pm my speed goes down to 36KB/Sec I even got as low as 17.9KB/Sec. I'm sorry, but there's no way anyone can say there's nothing wrong here.
I thought that before Cogeco actually does any trouble shooting the line speed has to be under 100KB/Sec. Well I'm deffinetly under that. |
|
bstephens
join:2002-10-09
Belleville, ON | This can't be normal.....
Test speed at 6:43pm 14,Oct
»/speedtests/18···34635080 |
|
InFloW
join:2002-08-10
Fergus, ON
 ·Cogeco Cable
| Wow I'm jelous of your speeds lol »/speedtests/62···34635957
Target Name: www.dslreports.com
IP: 209.123.109.175
Date/Time: 10/14/2002 6:56:05 PM
1 30 ms 90 ms [10.66.32.1]
2 40 ms 40 ms cgowave-0-161.cgocable.net [24.226.0.161]
3 751 ms 731 ms d226-6-1.home.cgocable.net [24.226.6.1]
4 20 ms 20 ms cgowave-0-197.cgocable.net [24.226.0.197]
5 781 ms 721 ms ra1sh-pos7-1.mt.bigpipeinc.com [66.244.223.225]
6 751 ms 731 ms rc1sh-ge10-0.mt.shawcable.net [66.163.66.9]
7 60 ms 61 ms rc1as-pos1-0.vx.shawcable.net [66.163.76.118]
8 70 ms 81 ms mae-east-atm.peer.nac.net [198.32.187.103]
9 761 ms 772 ms at-0-1-0-1163.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.49]
10 761 ms 771 ms gi-1-1-95.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
11 771 ms 791 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Hehe I'm blazing along on my 56k like cable! hmm maybe isdn like cable would better describe it  |
|
bstephens
join:2002-10-09
Belleville, ON
| Well no matter what package your on VeZoZ that is absolutely disgusting. Your on High-Speed cable paying $44.00 or so a month for that.
There is a problem out there and it needs to be addressed!
We are not making this up folks. I realize that speeds and quality are not consistant. Some have claimed otherwise, but the line speeds that both myself and VeZoZ have posted are a clear indication that somethings wrong somewhere.
There is a point where the level of quality has to be questioned. I'm sorry I don't mean to be rude or harsh, but this is just how I am seeing the situation.
I was told by a Tech on the phone that unless you are getting below 100KB/sec they will not investigate the problem. I presume this is correct info. |
|
