bstephens
join:2002-10-09
Belleville, ON
| reply to djdnz
Re: 1 AM Peak Hour?
I'm in Belleville Lippy and there is deffinetly a problem here with my speed. In the mornings to afternoon I get around 419KB/Sec (I'm on the Pro package for now)
At night around 6:00pm to 11:45pm my speed goes down to 36KB/Sec I even got as low as 17.9KB/Sec. I'm sorry, but there's no way anyone can say there's nothing wrong here.
I thought that before Cogeco actually does any trouble shooting the line speed has to be under 100KB/Sec. Well I'm deffinetly under that. |
|
bstephens
join:2002-10-09
Belleville, ON | This can't be normal.....
Test speed at 6:43pm 14,Oct
»/speedtests/18···34635080 |
|
InFloW
join:2002-08-10
Fergus, ON
 ·Cogeco Cable
| Wow I'm jelous of your speeds lol »/speedtests/62···34635957
Target Name: www.dslreports.com
IP: 209.123.109.175
Date/Time: 10/14/2002 6:56:05 PM
1 30 ms 90 ms [10.66.32.1]
2 40 ms 40 ms cgowave-0-161.cgocable.net [24.226.0.161]
3 751 ms 731 ms d226-6-1.home.cgocable.net [24.226.6.1]
4 20 ms 20 ms cgowave-0-197.cgocable.net [24.226.0.197]
5 781 ms 721 ms ra1sh-pos7-1.mt.bigpipeinc.com [66.244.223.225]
6 751 ms 731 ms rc1sh-ge10-0.mt.shawcable.net [66.163.66.9]
7 60 ms 61 ms rc1as-pos1-0.vx.shawcable.net [66.163.76.118]
8 70 ms 81 ms mae-east-atm.peer.nac.net [198.32.187.103]
9 761 ms 772 ms at-0-1-0-1163.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.49]
10 761 ms 771 ms gi-1-1-95.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
11 771 ms 791 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Hehe I'm blazing along on my 56k like cable! hmm maybe isdn like cable would better describe it  |
|
bstephens
join:2002-10-09
Belleville, ON
| Well no matter what package your on VeZoZ that is absolutely disgusting. Your on High-Speed cable paying $44.00 or so a month for that.
There is a problem out there and it needs to be addressed!
We are not making this up folks. I realize that speeds and quality are not consistant. Some have claimed otherwise, but the line speeds that both myself and VeZoZ have posted are a clear indication that somethings wrong somewhere.
There is a point where the level of quality has to be questioned. I'm sorry I don't mean to be rude or harsh, but this is just how I am seeing the situation.
I was told by a Tech on the phone that unless you are getting below 100KB/sec they will not investigate the problem. I presume this is correct info. |
|
