siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY
| reply to GeekNJ
Re: OOL FTP speed test is BULLSHIT
Okay , but you saw yourself that the speeds from OOL test aren't the same as the actual speeds since the AOL file you downloaded went twice as fast on your PC.
[text was edited by author 2002-11-03 16:42:32] |
|
GeekNJ
Premium
join:2000-09-23
Waldwick, NJ
| Every time you run, outside of OOL, you'll see different speeds.
Tracert for me to the AOL FTP server:
C:\>tracert ftp.aol.com
Tracing route to ftp.aol.com [64.12.168.246]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 10 ms 20 ms 11 ms my-cv-ubrs [10.93.192.1]
2 ping 64.12.128.46 -l 1400
Pinging 64.12.128.46 with 1400 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.12.128.46: bytes=1400 time=30ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.12.128.46: bytes=1400 time=21ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.12.128.46: bytes=1400 time=20ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.12.128.46: bytes=1400 time=20ms TTL=241
Ping statistics for 64.12.128.46:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 22ms
What do you show?
--
Have you tweaked your OOL connection? |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY
| Tracing route to ftp.aol.com [205.188.212.118]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.45.0.1
2 7 ms 5 ms 5 ms dstswr1-vlan2.rh.nyk3ny.cv.net [67.83.221.33]
3 8 ms 6 ms 7 ms ool-4353dd01.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.221.1]
4 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms r1-srp1-0.cr.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.38]
5 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms r1-srp1-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.12.98]
6 10 ms 7 ms 7 ms r1-srp13-0.in.nycmny83.cv.net [167.206.12.147]
7 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms pop1-nye-P4-2.atdn.net [66.185.149.193]
8 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms bb2old-nye-P5-0.atdn.net [66.185.141.18]
9 8 ms 9 ms 7 ms bb2-nye-P3-0.atdn.net [66.185.153.24]
10 12 ms 11 ms 13 ms bb2-vie-P8-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.201]
11 12 ms 13 ms 13 ms bb2-dtc-P2-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.110]
12 12 ms 13 ms 13 ms pop1-dtc-P15-0.atdn.net [66.185.144.254]
13 14 ms 13 ms 12 ms ow1-dr2-S0-1-0.atdn.net [66.185.145.14]
14 13 ms 13 ms 13 ms 172.18.126.2
15 172.18.126.6 reports: Destination net unreachable. |
|
GeekNJ
Premium
join:2000-09-23
Waldwick, NJ
| Oops... tracert didn't paste right...
C:\>tracert ftp.aol.com
Tracing route to ftp.aol.com [64.12.168.246]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms my-cv-ubrs [10.93.192.1]
2 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms dstswr1-vlan2.rh.wlwknj.cv.net [67.83.250.161]
3 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms r3-ge9-2.mhe.prnynj.cv.net [67.83.250.129]
4 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms r1-srp-1-0.cr.prnynj.cv.net [67.83.239.49]
5 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms r1-srp-13-0.wan.prnynj.cv.net [67.83.239.1]
6 10 ms 10 ms 20 ms r1-srp13-0.in.nycmny83.cv.net [167.206.12.147]
7 10 ms 10 ms 20 ms pop1-nye-P4-2.atdn.net [66.185.149.193]
8 20 ms 10 ms 10 ms bb2old-nye-P5-0.atdn.net [66.185.141.18]
9 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms bb2-nye-P3-0.atdn.net [66.185.153.24]
10 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms bb2-vie-P8-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.201]
11 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms bb2-dtc-P8-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.118]
12 20 ms 10 ms 20 ms bb2-mtc-P9-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.103]
13 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms pop1-mtc-P12-0.atdn.net [66.185.143.195]
14 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms ow1-mc1-P0-0.atdn.net [66.185.144.210]
15 * * * Request timed out.
Your times seem to be relatively the same as mine.
--
Have you tweaked your OOL connection? |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY
| I have to wait until Quickie downloads the file and posts his speed, since his lives half a block away, plus his tracert of dslreports.com is the same as mine EXACTLY. I think when he says that he gets 8000kbps is only on the OOL FTP or JAVA. We'll see soon enough. It could be that my whole neighborhood doesn't get 8000kbps.
[text was edited by author 2002-11-03 17:12:08] |
|
JoshNJ
Premium
join:2001-12-25
Freehold, NJ | siikosane, not everyone gets the same speeds... stop bitching already and move on...
--
-=God Is Pretend=- |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY
| Listen JoshNJ , if you don't like what i post, than don't read the thread . This is the third time you are here talking out of your ass.
[text was edited by author 2002-11-03 18:38:48] |
|
JoshNJ
Premium
join:2001-12-25
Freehold, NJ
| your question was answered within 4 posts, you have kept this thread going for 9 pages, and have been told by both cv customer service and people here that you don't have any problem with your connection... and you think im the one who has a problem? hah!
--
-=God Is Pretend=- |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY | As i said before. Nobody is forcing you to answer or even look. You don't own BBR. I couldn't care less about what you have to say, so save your bandwith and don't post here. |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY
| reply to GeekNJ
Quik gets 443kb/sec on the AOL download.
I found out that me and Quik get speeds of 300 +MB/sec when download one file from a certain site, but when download 4 of the same files at a time speed goes up to 1.2MB/sec. Is there a way to tweak so one file can be downloaded at 1.2MB/sec
Go here ----> »usa.bmwfilms.com/clap.asp?templa···assreg=Y
download one of the movies. Tell me your speed (that's what we used)
[text was edited by author 2002-11-03 19:06:17] |
|
JoshNJ
Premium
join:2001-12-25
Freehold, NJ | 1.2 is above the cap, you are not really downloading that fast
--
-=God Is Pretend=- |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY
| I have DU meter on , The speed was jumping between 1050 - 1170. Even if it wasn't that fast it was 1MB for sure.
[text was edited by author 2002-11-03 19:18:34] |
|
Irish Shark
Play Like A Champion Today
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-29
Las Vegas, NV
| reply to siikosane
I got 545 before I canned it. Was quick using a download accelerator? Or just 4 DL's of the same file?
-----------------------------
I really think that this has gone on for long enough, as Josh said. We (I) have tried everything that we know to up the speed outside of OOL Land. You are fine. get a grip and move on. 
--
Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are. |
|
Irish Shark
Play Like A Champion Today
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-29
Las Vegas, NV
| reply to siikosane
said by siikosane  :
I have DU meter on , The speed was jumping between 1050 - 1170. Even if it wasn't that fast it was 1MB for sure.
That is 8602 - 9585 in Speakeasy terms. What more do you want?
--
Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are. |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY | Actually it did work fine with Download Accelerator. I was just going to end this thread. Thanks a lot Irish Shark, GeekNJ, Quik, Jefe, and Defman. |
|
GeekNJ
Premium
join:2000-09-23
Waldwick, NJ
| reply to JoshNJ
Unless I calculated incorrectly, 1.2MB == 9830kb so it's not technically over the 10/1 cap. But that's need here nor there.
Enjoy the speed!
--
Have you tweaked your OOL connection? |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY
| reply to siikosane
. |
|
JoshNJ
Premium
join:2001-12-25
Freehold, NJ | there is still nothing wrong there... |
|
BUBBALOU
360 DOF Descent
join:2000-12-31
Jacksonville, FL
| reply to siikosane
I can not believe this even went past the First page and was not squashed!!!! During my wonderful time on OOL I too did the tests.
OOL FTP test 1.02 MB / Sec (based on 1024 as in File size)
NYC.Speakeasy.net : 8111 kbps Down and 895 kbps up (based on rounded Transfer rate of 1000)
lets do some quick math
1.02 MB /sec translates into 8355.84 kbps by file size yet 8160 kbps in transfer rate (according to the powers that be who came up with the rounding measure). That is not bad when dealing with battle of FTP vs Java speed tests
Look~~> 8111 vs 8160
So quit barking up the wrong tree and try to understand the difference of
-MB/Sec vs Mbps
-KB/Sec vs Kbps
Or should I say HD File Size VS Network Transfer Rate
Microsoft site = 998 KB/Sec! screaming downloads period. I was even able to achieve a 700 KB/ Sec download from File Planet for the Americas Army Demo (now that is scary) Also if you use a line monitoring program like NetStat Live you can display the results in File size or Network transfer rate.
--
Why let rank lead, when ability can do it better!
[text was edited by author 2002-11-09 20:04:08] |
|
siikosane
join:2002-08-29
Brooklyn, NY | Who do you take me for ? 8000kbps is 1MB/sec DUH!!! |
|
