  Irish Shark Play Like A Champion Today Premium,MVM join:2000-07-29 Las Vegas, NV
| reply to dumwaldo Re: I thought routers were not allowed on OOL
I change my mind from Have a Good year  _________________
Have a Good Life  ________________--
ui02y54m2yi2654-m8b 964 -- Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are. |
|
  dumwaldo Premium join:2001-03-12
| reply to Jetta392 this point deserved its very own post.
said by Jetta392 : What they mean is in the example of CATV you cannot take your cable line and run it to the neighbors house. But you can hook up multiple TV's to one incoming line in your own home.. This is big TOS and in violation.
you may NOT hook up as many TV's as you want to a single incoming line. cablevision has charges for using additional sets and circumventing those charges would be considered theft of services. a crime. -- If I, were to die, murdered in cold blood tommorrow, would you feel sorrow, or show love, or would it matter? |
|
  Irish Shark Play Like A Champion Today Premium,MVM join:2000-07-29 Las Vegas, NV | Troll .... I am going to report you to the Mods. |
|
  GeekNJ Premium join:2000-09-23 Waldwick, NJ
| reply to dumwaldo said by dumwaldo : you may NOT hook up as many TV's as you want to a single incoming line. cablevision has charges for using additional sets and circumventing those charges would be considered theft of services. a crime.
No. There is no per-set charge for cable tv. There's a per-set charge for a cable box, but for running a cable to any or as many TV's as you want is perfectly fine and not a violation of anything.
And I think this lack of understanding on your part clearly shows everyone the lack of understanding regarding your perception that using a router is a violation, when indeed it is not. -- Have you tweaked your OOL connection? [text was edited by author 2002-11-09 20:39:44] |
|
  Jmartz
join:2000-07-20 Tenafly, NJ
| reply to dumwaldo said by dumwaldo : you may NOT hook up as many TV's as you want to a single incoming line. cablevision has charges for using additional sets and circumventing those charges would be considered theft of services. a crime.
They have additional outlet fees for iO. I can't find anything about them charging more per TV on analog cable without cable boxes. [text was edited by author 2002-11-09 20:39:51] |
|
  mikepd Discovery Premium,MVM join:2000-10-26 New Port Richey, FL clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to metal1 A router most certainly does contain a processor, memory and an operating system. Here are the specs for my router/ICSA firewall which is a Zywall 10II:
Key specs Processor: Toshiba 3927 @ 133 MHz Co-processor: SafeNet SafeXcel 1140 (VPN) RAM: 16MB ROM: 4MB flash WAN: 10/100 LAN:10/100
The operating system is:
Bootbase Version: V1.05 | 03/12/2002 16:55:33 RAM: Size = 16384 Kbytes FLASH: Intel 32M
ZyNOS Version: V3.50(WF.1) | 07/25/2002 10:51:05
The co-processor allows it to do 3DES encryption at 10mbps.
Like a pc the router OS is backed up by a 3v battery and can sync with a time server for accuracy. There is non-volatile ram for log storage which can be cleared by the user. -- Always Reach Beyond Your Grasp |
|
  jaa Premium,MVM join:2000-06-13
·Optimum Online
·Vonage
| reply to metal1 I find it hard to believe this discussion is still going on. Routers are allowed on OOL, but not supported. There is no additional charge for additional TVs in CT. These are simple, undisputed facts. -- NOTHING justifies terrorism. We don't negotiate with terrorists. Those that support terrorists are terrorists. |
|
  dumwaldo Premium join:2001-03-12
| reply to mikepd i stand corrected about the routers not meeting minimum system requirements. OH WAIT they dont have a hard drive do they?
quote: Rick/Wilt/Other "official" OOL representative:
There's a little discussion on the DSLReports forum regarding routers. One of the less stable individuals there says:
[quote] a router IS a violation of the TOS.
section 33 states "Subscriber may not resell, share, or otherwise distribute the Service or any portion thereof to any third party without the written consent of Cablevision".
a router shares the connection.
[/end quote]
Can we just put this to rest. Using a router is not sharing the service with A THIRD PARTY and is perfectly acceptable, though not supported.
Can someone from OOL just respond with "Yes" please.
Thanks!!!! David
quote:
Neither of us are here to state policy, but I would observe that many OOLers use routers, and you know that we don't provide customer support for routers. So why listen to anyone who says otherwise on DSLR? You get what you pay for with legal/medical and other professional advice :-D Rick
just so you know, rick did NOT say yes. when asked for a direct and simple answer he could not simply say yes. -- If I, were to die, murdered in cold blood tommorrow, would you feel sorrow, or show love, or would it matter? |
|
  jaa Premium,MVM join:2000-06-13 | reply to metal1 Routers are allowed on OOL. |
|
  DefMan
join:2002-02-20 Elmont, NY
| reply to jaa Almost 20 years with CV we connect 6 TV's with one line. No box. CV never had a prob with it, even when our last visit by an installer which was almost 15 years ago. Now, this will all end come Jan. 1st. -- "The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is the one right that allows us to exist at all. Now, either you believe that or you dont, and you must decide."---Charlton Heston President, NRA |
|
  Irish Shark Play Like A Champion Today Premium,MVM join:2000-07-29 Las Vegas, NV | reply to jaa jaa, we have a perfectly good thread until someone decided to turn it upside down.
Just put him on ignore, like the rest of are going to do. -- Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are. |
|
  GeekNJ Premium join:2000-09-23 Waldwick, NJ
| reply to dumwaldo He didn't say NO and he even said, in reference to you, "So why listen to anyone who says otherwise on DSLR?"
And the following is off the »www.fcc.gov site:
Q2. Can operators using the benchmark rate methodology charge a monthly additional outlet charge for NPTs?
A2. No. An additional outlet charge is not permitted except to the extent operators incur additional programming costs when providing service to additional outlets. In the Going Forward Order, the Commission determined that NPTs are CPSTs within the meaning of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See Going Forward Order at note 3*. The Commission previously determined that because the Communications Act required that equipment be priced on the basis of "actual cost," there is no basis in the statute to allow operators to charge for the value of additional connections above "actual cost." An exception exists for additional outlets used to provide per view or per channel services because those services are completely unregulated under the Communications Act. See First Order on Reconsideration, FCC 93-428 (adopted and released August 27, 1993) at para. 54 & n. 87. Because NPTs are CPSTs under the Communications Act, the actual cost standard applies and an additional outlet charge is not allowed when more than one outlet is used to receive an NPT except to the extent the operator incurs additional programming costs when providing service to additional outlets.
NPT - Non Premium Tier
If you have no premiums (HBO, SHO, ect.) then they can only charge you for the cost of the installation of the outlet. -- Have you tweaked your OOL connection? |
|
  jaa Premium,MVM join:2000-06-13 | reply to metal1 Nobody is arguing. Routers are permitted on OOL. |
|
  Bobcat Premium join:2001-02-04 Bedminster, NJ
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to DefMan said by DefMan : Almost 20 years with CV we connect 6 TV's with one line. No box. CV never had a prob with it, even when our last visit by an installer which was almost 15 years ago. Now, this will all end come Jan. 1st.
When we had TKR here, you had to pay based on the number of sets hooked up. When the installer came out and saw my 5-way splitter (but I only had one TV), he said that was "illegal". Now, Cablevision lets you connect as many TVs as you want.
What happens on Jan 1st? -- "As with all sovereign nations, we respect Iraq's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity." » Donald Rumsfeld, 1983. |
|
  Irish Shark Play Like A Champion Today Premium,MVM join:2000-07-29 Las Vegas, NV
| said by Bobcat : What happens on Jan 1st?
Bob, what happens on 1.01.03? I am not being a wise arse. -- Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are. |
|
  Bobcat Premium join:2001-02-04 Bedminster, NJ | I don't know. That's why I'm asking. |
|
  GeekNJ Premium join:2000-09-23 Waldwick, NJ
| Is that the date that premiums will be on io only in certain locations and no longer available on the old Analog converters? If so, he'll need a tech visit (after 1 years) to get io installed.
If not, I don't know why. -- Have you tweaked your OOL connection? |
|
  Irish Shark Play Like A Champion Today Premium,MVM join:2000-07-29 Las Vegas, NV | That could be the reason. That's maybe why CV is all in a rush to get iO across the board. -- Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are. |
|
  GeekNJ Premium join:2000-09-23 Waldwick, NJ
| Besides a revenue increase, the elimination of analog channels provides more bandwidth for digital channels. Especially those analog channels that are already broadcast digitally. -- Have you tweaked your OOL connection? |
|
  La Luna Surviving Ashraful Premium join:2001-07-12 Warwick, NY clubs:
·Optimum Online
·Vonage
| reply to GeekNJ said by GeekNJ : Is that the date that premiums will be on io only in certain locations and no longer available on the old Analog converters? If so, he'll need a tech visit (after 1 years) to get io installed.
If not, I don't know why.
Unless of course having multiple premiums on one iO hookup are against the TOS......
I can't believe what I've been reading. geez.... -- »www.sarahbrightman.co.uk »www.sarah-brightman.com/ |
|