Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » OptimumOnline » I thought routers were not allowed on OOL
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
798
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
OT: Theft of Service? »
« OOL FTP speed test is BULLSHIT  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
AuthorAll Replies


Irish Shark
Play Like A Champion Today
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-29
Las Vegas, NV

reply to dumwaldo
Re: I thought routers were not allowed on OOL

I change my mind from Have a Good year
_________________

Have a Good Life
________________--

ui02y54m2yi2654-m8b 964
--
Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are.


dumwaldo
Premium
join:2001-03-12

reply to Jetta392
this point deserved its very own post.

said by Jetta392 See Profile:
What they mean is in the example of CATV you cannot take your cable line and run it to the neighbors house. But you can hook up multiple TV's to one incoming line in your own home.. This is big TOS and in violation.
you may NOT hook up as many TV's as you want to a single incoming line. cablevision has charges for using additional sets and circumventing those charges would be considered theft of services. a crime.
--
If I, were to die, murdered in cold blood tommorrow, would you feel sorrow, or show love, or would it matter?


Irish Shark
Play Like A Champion Today
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-29
Las Vegas, NV
Troll .... I am going to report you to the Mods.


GeekNJ
Premium
join:2000-09-23
Waldwick, NJ


reply to dumwaldo
said by dumwaldo See Profile:
you may NOT hook up as many TV's as you want to a single incoming line. cablevision has charges for using additional sets and circumventing those charges would be considered theft of services. a crime.
No. There is no per-set charge for cable tv. There's a per-set charge for a cable box, but for running a cable to any or as many TV's as you want is perfectly fine and not a violation of anything.

And I think this lack of understanding on your part clearly shows everyone the lack of understanding regarding your perception that using a router is a violation, when indeed it is not.
--
Have you tweaked your OOL connection?

[text was edited by author 2002-11-09 20:39:44]


Jmartz

join:2000-07-20
Tenafly, NJ


reply to dumwaldo
said by dumwaldo See Profile:
you may NOT hook up as many TV's as you want to a single incoming line. cablevision has charges for using additional sets and circumventing those charges would be considered theft of services. a crime.
They have additional outlet fees for iO. I can't find anything about them charging more per TV on analog cable without cable boxes.
[text was edited by author 2002-11-09 20:39:51]


mikepd
Discovery
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-26
New Port Richey, FL
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to metal1
A router most certainly does contain a processor, memory and an operating system. Here are the specs for my router/ICSA firewall which is a Zywall 10II:

Key specs
Processor: Toshiba 3927 @ 133 MHz
Co-processor: SafeNet SafeXcel 1140 (VPN)
RAM: 16MB
ROM: 4MB flash
WAN: 10/100
LAN:10/100

The operating system is:

Bootbase Version: V1.05 | 03/12/2002 16:55:33
RAM: Size = 16384 Kbytes
FLASH: Intel 32M

ZyNOS Version: V3.50(WF.1) | 07/25/2002 10:51:05

The co-processor allows it to do 3DES encryption at 10mbps.

Like a pc the router OS is backed up by a 3v battery and can sync with a time server for accuracy. There is non-volatile ram for log storage which can be cleared by the user.
--
Always Reach Beyond Your Grasp


jaa
Premium,MVM
join:2000-06-13
·Optimum Online
·Vonage

reply to metal1
I find it hard to believe this discussion is still going on. Routers are allowed on OOL, but not supported. There is no additional charge for additional TVs in CT. These are simple, undisputed facts.
--
NOTHING justifies terrorism. We don't negotiate with terrorists. Those that support terrorists are terrorists.


dumwaldo
Premium
join:2001-03-12

reply to mikepd
i stand corrected about the routers not meeting minimum system requirements. OH WAIT they dont have a hard drive do they?

quote:
Rick/Wilt/Other "official" OOL representative:

There's a little discussion on the DSLReports forum regarding
routers. One of the less stable individuals there says:

[quote]
a router IS a violation of the TOS.

section 33 states "Subscriber may not resell, share, or otherwise
distribute the Service or any portion thereof to any third party
without the written consent of Cablevision".

a router shares the connection.

[/end quote]

Can we just put this to rest. Using a router is not sharing the
service with A THIRD PARTY and is perfectly acceptable, though not
supported.

Can someone from OOL just respond with "Yes" please.

Thanks!!!!
David

quote:

Neither of us are here to state policy, but I would observe
that many OOLers use routers, and you know that we don't provide
customer support for routers. So why listen to anyone who
says otherwise on DSLR? You get what you pay for with
legal/medical and other professional advice :-D Rick
just so you know, rick did NOT say yes. when asked for a direct and simple answer he could not simply say yes.
--
If I, were to die, murdered in cold blood tommorrow, would you feel sorrow, or show love, or would it matter?


jaa
Premium,MVM
join:2000-06-13
reply to metal1
Routers are allowed on OOL.


DefMan

join:2002-02-20
Elmont, NY

reply to jaa
Almost 20 years with CV we connect 6 TV's with one line. No box. CV never had a prob with it, even when our last visit by an installer which was almost 15 years ago. Now, this will all end come Jan. 1st.
--
"The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is the one right that allows us to exist at all. Now, either you believe that or you don’t, and you must decide."---Charlton Heston President, NRA


Irish Shark
Play Like A Champion Today
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-29
Las Vegas, NV
reply to jaa
jaa, we have a perfectly good thread until someone decided to turn it upside down.

Just put him on ignore, like the rest of are going to do.
--
Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are.


GeekNJ
Premium
join:2000-09-23
Waldwick, NJ

reply to dumwaldo
He didn't say NO and he even said, in reference to you, "So why listen to anyone who says otherwise on DSLR?"

And the following is off the »www.fcc.gov site:

Q2. Can operators using the benchmark rate methodology charge a monthly
additional outlet charge for NPTs?

A2. No. An additional outlet charge is not permitted except to the extent operators incur
additional programming costs when providing service to additional outlets. In the
Going Forward Order, the Commission determined that NPTs are CPSTs within the
meaning of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See Going Forward Order
at note 3*. The Commission previously determined that because the Communications
Act required that equipment be priced on the basis of "actual cost," there is no basis in
the statute to allow operators to charge for the value of additional connections above
"actual cost." An exception exists for additional outlets used to provide per view or
per channel services because those services are completely unregulated under the
Communications Act. See First Order on Reconsideration, FCC 93-428 (adopted and
released August 27, 1993) at para. 54 & n. 87. Because NPTs are CPSTs under the
Communications Act, the actual cost standard applies and an additional outlet charge
is not allowed when more than one outlet is used to receive an NPT except to the
extent the operator incurs additional programming costs when providing service to
additional outlets.

NPT - Non Premium Tier

If you have no premiums (HBO, SHO, ect.) then they can only charge you for the cost of the
installation of the outlet.
--
Have you tweaked your OOL connection?


jaa
Premium,MVM
join:2000-06-13
reply to metal1
Nobody is arguing. Routers are permitted on OOL.


Bobcat
Premium
join:2001-02-04
Bedminster, NJ
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to DefMan
said by DefMan See Profile:
Almost 20 years with CV we connect 6 TV's with one line. No box. CV never had a prob with it, even when our last visit by an installer which was almost 15 years ago. Now, this will all end come Jan. 1st.

When we had TKR here, you had to pay based on the number of sets hooked up. When the installer came out and saw my 5-way splitter (but I only had one TV), he said that was "illegal". Now, Cablevision lets you connect as many TVs as you want.

What happens on Jan 1st?
--
"As with all sovereign nations, we respect Iraq's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity."
» Donald Rumsfeld, 1983.


Irish Shark
Play Like A Champion Today
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-29
Las Vegas, NV

said by Bobcat See Profile:
What happens on Jan 1st?
Bob, what happens on 1.01.03? I am not being a wise arse.
--
Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are.


Bobcat
Premium
join:2001-02-04
Bedminster, NJ
I don't know. That's why I'm asking.


GeekNJ
Premium
join:2000-09-23
Waldwick, NJ

Is that the date that premiums will be on io only in certain locations and no longer available on the old Analog converters? If so, he'll need a tech visit (after 1 years) to get io installed.

If not, I don't know why.
--
Have you tweaked your OOL connection?


Irish Shark
Play Like A Champion Today
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-29
Las Vegas, NV
That could be the reason. That's maybe why CV is all in a rush to get iO across the board.
--
Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are.


GeekNJ
Premium
join:2000-09-23
Waldwick, NJ

Besides a revenue increase, the elimination of analog channels provides more bandwidth for digital channels. Especially those analog channels that are already broadcast digitally.
--
Have you tweaked your OOL connection?


La Luna
Surviving Ashraful
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
clubs:
·Optimum Online
·Vonage

reply to GeekNJ
said by GeekNJ See Profile:
Is that the date that premiums will be on io only in certain locations and no longer available on the old Analog converters? If so, he'll need a tech visit (after 1 years) to get io installed.

If not, I don't know why.

Unless of course having multiple premiums on one iO hookup are against the TOS......

I can't believe what I've been reading. geez....
--
»www.sarahbrightman.co.uk »www.sarah-brightman.com/
Thread is
Forums » US Cable Support » OptimumOnlineOT: Theft of Service? »
« OOL FTP speed test is BULLSHIT  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5


Saturday, 05-Dec 09:57:32 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [94] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [84] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [ Billing] Modem rental price increase [Comcast HSI]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Road Runnner up to 50 mbps is ready ! [Road Runner]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ZR1 VS The USN Blue Angels! [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]