Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA | reply to DrTCP
Re: It is illegal!
Since the island is run by the U.S. Navy (it's a restricted area) I'm sure the FCC isn't going to arrest anyone. |
|
DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX | So the goverment is allowed to break the rules?
Not exactly the lawful, example setting type of government that I would like to see. |
|
Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA | It's against the law to own a cruise missile and a nuclear submarine but the U.S. Navy gets to break those rules too. |
|
russotto
join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA | reply to DrTCP
If the government could operate under the restrictions it sets for the common people, there'd have to be a lot fewer restrictions. That would be intolerable to the government. |
|
DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX
| reply to Count Hogula$
said by Count Hogula$  :
It's against the law to own a cruise missile and a nuclear submarine but the U.S. Navy gets to break those rules too.
The armed forces are licensed to own and use those toys so there is no comparison. As far as I know there is not a special provision in the FCC ruling granting armed forces special exception of exceeding legal power limits.
Armed forces are granted exclusive ownership of certain frequency bands and they can use them as they wish. But, when they are using a civilian band they should respect the rules set for the band as well (again unless otherwise specified or licensed by the FCC)
Besides it looks like it is not even the armed forces operating this link illegally it is the construction company working for them.
Government or not. Nobody should be above the rule of the law. This used to set us apart from the 3rd world countries where laws does not seem to apply to the governing body. |
|
DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX
| reply to russotto
said by russotto :
If the government could operate under the restrictions it sets for the common people, there'd have to be a lot fewer restrictions. That would be intolerable to the government.
Government is not above the law and order. If they need special provisions for special purposes they should get that written in the law and regulations. |
|
Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA
| reply to DrTCP
The armed forces aren't licensed to own anything...they just do it. They have radar that uses the same frequencies as other radar but with power way above what is normally permitted by the FCC. Unless there is a complaint...the military should do what it pleases. And even if their is a complain...the duties of the military outweigh the duties of civilians.
For instance...there are speed limits for airplanes when they are in a TCA, air-air, air-ground proximity limits etc...but the military doesn't have to obey those FAA regulations. They're the military.
I mean hell...I see cops illegally parked running radar or patrolling a carpool lane with only 1 deputy in the car.
--
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. -Thomas Jefferson |
|
DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX
| said by Count Hogula$ :
The armed forces aren't licensed to own anything...they just do it. They have radar that uses the same frequencies as other radar but with power way above what is normally permitted by the FCC. Unless there is a complaint...the military should do what it pleases. And even if their is a complain...the duties of the military outweigh the duties of civilians.
Military is there to serve a civilian regime.
Military being military does not give any excuse. They have to answer civilian authority. If they have reasonable need for certain frequencies or modes of they should be authorized for that.
Protecting the country also means protecting the laws and institutions of the country and respecting the rules and laws. Otherwise, you quickly become a military dictatorship.
Now if armed forces are breaking the laws knowingly and on purpose shame on them and shame on our institutions that fail to address the issue.
BTW, there are procedures set up between FAA and Military air operations regulating the flights of military planes. It might be less restrictive wrt civilian aircraft but it does not mean there are no rules there. They do that because they are granted for that. |
|
Omega
Displaced Ohioan
Premium
join:2002-07-30
Santa Maria, CA
clubs:  | reply to DrTCP
Its not like they are killing people. All the are doing is making a big wireless network, I can see why you disagree with what they are doing, but it is really no big deal. |
|
aitech
Guru. Kneel
join:2000-12-19
Boston, MA
clubs:
|  reply to Count Hogula$
Re: It is illegal! Are you kidding!?
This is a funny thread...
The Gov't breaks the "rules" all the time.. who are you kidding.. Next time you see a cop illegally parked in front in front of the doughnut shop, or speeding down the road, or running a red light because he doesn't want to wait for the rest of us, or using some stupid technicallity in the law to catch somebody doing something else, next time you see a congressman illegallily accepting money from a tobacco company to keep cigaretts legal.. etc etc etc
I could do this all week.. I think the "gov't" breaks more "rules" and more often then most crooks combined. And if you disagree, you've gotta be kidding me..
--
1536/384 Covad. 1380/360 actual. 20-60ms pings. Great!!Was a BITCH to install 60+ days and 100+ incompetent moron's along the way, but it's GREAT and SOLID now.. GO NYY!! |
|
ThirdShifter
Premium
join:2002-03-16
Vernon Rockville, CT | reply to DrTCP
Re: It is illegal!
Ever been in the military?
--
do you yahoo! |
|
Neactom
Why Me?
join:2001-05-03
Hampton, VA | reply to Omega
the government owns their own vast spectrums of frequencies i'm pretty sure they have full control over everything that goes on inside of those ie ENCRYPTION OR BREAKING FCC RULES |
|
