cableblows3
join:2001-06-17
Indianapolis, IN
|  reply to ravital
Re: That's a funny, if ineffectual way around it
HR>I'm glad we agree. It's not an "entitlement" if that's what you mean. At the same time it's hard to ignore the fact that so many of us would gladly pay for it if there were a legal way to get exactly what we want for a reasonable price. [/QUOTE]
Thank You Very Much!!!! Nuff Said!!! |
|
ravital
Just Another Pesky Independent Nh Voter
Premium
join:2001-07-19
Merrimack, NH
| reply to boogie74
said by boogie74  :
The rest of my subsequent post was directed at the droves of people here on DSLR that hold the opinion that they are entitled to obtain music without paying for it because of the following empty if not completely false reasons:
I'm glad we agree. It's not an "entitlement" if that's what you mean. At the same time it's hard to ignore the fact that so many of us would gladly pay for it if there were a legal way to get exactly what we want for a reasonable price. |
|
sharkbyte0
join:2000-09-07
Lansdale, PA
| reply to boogie74
said by boogie74:
It's wrong, you know it, so quit complaining about reasons why you should be allowed to do it.
Read carefully. I'm only going to waste my time once.
Intellectual -1 a : of or relating to the intellect or its use b : developed or chiefly guided by the intellect rather than by emotion or experience : RATIONAL c : requiring use of the intellect
2 a : given to study, reflection, and speculation b : engaged in activity requiring the creative use of the intellect
Property - 1 a : a quality or trait belonging and especially peculiar to an individual or thing b : an effect that an object has on another object or on the senses c : VIRTUE 3 d : an attribute common to all members of a class
2 a : something owned or possessed; specifically : a piece of real estate b : the exclusive right to possess, enjoy, and dispose of a thing : OWNERSHIP c : something to which a person or business has a legal title d : one (as a performer) under contract whose work is especially valuable
3 : an article or object used in a play or motion picture except painted scenery and costumes
Since you are such the model of intellectual rigor; explain to the audience, in pratical terms; how an individual, or an entity, could own an intellectual concept, otherwise known as an idea?
How long could an individual, or entity prevent this idea from being stolen and being reproduced, once the idea is presented publicly?
How long can an idea, especially a popular one, be contained or restricted, when presented publicly?
What political and economic systems can possibly be successful in limiting a publicly expressed idea for an indefinite period of time?
Answer these questions, and I might just continue wasting my intellectual property on you.
Have a good one.
Regards
Shark... |
|
BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
 ·Comcast
| reply to boogie74
quote:
My response to these attitudes and more is simple: Yes, people as a whole will try to get away with as much as they can at any one given point of time. Does that mean that it is still ok?
Boogie
sure download away the riaa has done stuff to drasticlly tip the scales in thier favor to keep getting repeatative pay. for instance the ability to sample a track created 20 years ago. yeah you gotta pay for stuff like that.
the riaa is defunct and the people know it. now trying to get the goverment to understand it is a different animal.
it's a game of cat and mouse and the riaa is trying to stop the game. they play these games in software piracy as well. they change key check alagorythms froms version to version or they update the methods to make it stronger.
it's done all over. my tax's should not be tied up in courts and stuff due to the riaa trying to maintain it's strong hold on the people who create music. these people like madonna are nothing more then corporate shills. they are told what to say and when to say it in fear of their cash cows being slaughtered for meat.
it's all in the game of life. it's a cat and mouse game. if the riaa wants to protect it's media go right ahead but be it known people won't stand for it and will stop buying it if they get out of hand.
did microsoft stop selling win xp when it was under scrutiny for it's piracy protection ??? no they stepped up and acted on what they new. so they let the updates take care of it, while also being non invasive now.
imagine that a company actually trying to protect it's cash cow the right way by building security and not tieing up peoples money in court. why doesn't the riaa do the same ??? why spend our money we can spend theirs.... |
|
boogie74
join:2001-06-19
Neenah, WI
clubs:
| reply to ravital
said by ravital :
said by boogie74 :
So get real, grow up, and realize that despite how much you think that the RIAA and the artistic world is a combination of the Nazi Third Reich, the Taliban and the Iraqi Baath Party, they are all looking to pay for the food on their table and they deserve a living too. It's wrong, you know it, so quit complaining about reasons why you should be allowed to do it.
All that because I had the nerve to correct you and point out that many performers do concerts in order to make money from concerts, and not just to promote an album or any album? Don't know what cross you bear, but I don't want any part of it.
[text was edited by author 2003-04-20 02:43:28]
Actually, your post happened to be the one that I hit "reply" on. I wasn't intending my post to be directed at you for solely responding to me.
I agreed with your post. The rest of my subsequent post was directed at the droves of people here on DSLR that hold the opinion that they are entitled to obtain music without paying for it because of the following empty if not completely false reasons:
1. Music today sucks.
2. Artists make no money from album sales anyways
3. P2P networking would expand DSL deployment.
4. The RIAA is a huge international conspiracy to fill our minds with "Boy Bands" and "New Pop Culture"
5. CD's are way overpriced at $30-75 per CD (I buy CD's for about $11, btw)
6. "I don't like all the songs on the CD, so until they find a way to sell me songs at $0.50 per song, I'll download them for free"
7. Madonna sucks.
My response to these attitudes and more is simple: Yes, people as a whole will try to get away with as much as they can at any one given point of time. Does that mean that it is still ok?
Boogie |
|
ravital
Just Another Pesky Independent Nh Voter
Premium
join:2001-07-19
Merrimack, NH
| reply to boogie74
said by boogie74 :
So get real, grow up, and realize that despite how much you think that the RIAA and the artistic world is a combination of the Nazi Third Reich, the Taliban and the Iraqi Baath Party, they are all looking to pay for the food on their table and they deserve a living too. It's wrong, you know it, so quit complaining about reasons why you should be allowed to do it.
All that because I had the nerve to correct you and point out that many performers do concerts in order to make money from concerts, and not just to promote an album or any album? Don't know what cross you bear, but I don't want any part of it.
[text was edited by author 2003-04-20 02:43:28] |
|
