Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Hiding Behind Your NAT » Rolling my own
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
another angle »
« bunch of crap  
AuthorAll Replies


amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to pvale
Re: Rolling my own

said by pvale See Profile:
What if you are running 2 NAT devices in series? I'm running a Freesco PC-made-into-router, feeding a Netgear RT314, and my machines are connected behind the Netgear box. I haven't read the mentioned paper, but the only ID that would show on the WAN side of the Freesco would be the Netgear's. Since Freesco is built on a small Linux distribution, I'm sure I can change what it does/reports.

The ID in question is the IP id string assigned to each packet by the OS, not the IP address of the NAT device. It only has to do with the IP address in that you would be monitoring/analyzing the all packet headers originating from a particular IP address.
--
Time is an abstract concept invented by carbon based life forms to monitor their constant decay.-Thunderclese


AthlGrond
Premium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
·Comcast

said by amenite See Profile:
The ID in question is the IP id string assigned to each packet by the OS, not the IP address of the NAT device.
Are the IPid's not assigned by the NAT device? Seems like they would have to be. (so the NAT device could send the packets to the correct IP in the LAN)


amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

said by AthlGrond See Profile:
said by amenite See Profile:
The ID in question is the IP id string assigned to each packet by the OS, not the IP address of the NAT device.
Are the IPid's not assigned by the NAT device? Seems like they would have to be. (so the NAT device could send the packets to the correct IP in the LAN)
According to the article, the "IP id" field is generated by the host, and is only used to reassemble fragmented packets. It must be unique among all packets of one protocol that have the same source and destination address (to allow for correct reassembly in case of fragmentation). I am assuming that the NAT device only alters the source IP, or leaves enough of the IP id string intact to allow the technique to work.
--
Time is an abstract concept invented by carbon based life forms to monitor their constant decay.-Thunderclese


AthlGrond
Premium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
Thanks, I reread it and much clearer now. You are correct.
Forums » Hiding Behind Your NATanother angle »
« bunch of crap  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 18:34:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [93] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [64] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [51] Verizon's Hanging Up On Rural America
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [27] Verizon's Higher ETFs Annoy Senator
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [23] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [19] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· House inspector failed to find major gas leak [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Live feed of MW2 playing PC version [PC gaming GAMES]
· [northeast] Comparison of FiOS Broadband Internet to Comcast Bla [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· Holy work line speeds!! [TekSavvy]