Dogbert
Premium
join:2002-03-28
Brookings, SD
edited
| What's With This Again?
Anyone else having poor speeds and latency tonight? I've been doing very, very well for the past two months. Tonight though my tracerts and speeds look EXACTLY like they used to when a lot of us were having all the problems earlier in the year.
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 10 ms 14 ms 13 ms 10.18.xxx.1
2 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms 12.xxx.17.161
3 42 ms 41 ms 69 ms 12.xxx.5.162
4 425 ms 399 ms 425 ms gbr2-p57.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.123.198.70]
5 425 ms 412 ms 412 ms tbr1-p012602.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.11.101]
6 316 ms 330 ms 329 ms tbr1-p012401.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.65]
7 302 ms 329 ms 371 ms tbr1-p012201.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.17]
8 439 ms 440 ms 439 ms gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]
9 453 ms 440 ms 453 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]
10 357 ms 357 ms 330 ms 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.202]
11 425 ms 495 ms 466 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
12 453 ms 467 ms 453 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
I hope it's just a glitch. I don't think I can take going back to the way it used to be again.
Any help out there?
[text was edited by author 2003-05-13 22:47:50] |
|
Zshen
join:2002-06-10
West Des Moines, IA
clubs:  
| Mine are normal...
traceroute to dslreports.com (209.123.109.175), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.16.180.1 (10.16.180.1) 14.238 ms 37.942 ms 11.346 ms
2 12.215.13.33 (12.215.13.33) 22.245 ms 13.735 ms 43.8 ms
3 12.215.6.22 (12.215.6.22) 22.829 ms 22.508 ms 83.116 ms
4 gbr6-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.123.6.6) 30.749 ms 26.731 ms 74.34 ms
5 tbr1-p013601.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.11.45) 34.812 ms 27.427 ms 24.615 ms
6 tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.10.1) 44.221 ms 52.236 ms 53.16 ms
7 gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net (12.123.214.181) 43.959 ms 79.832 ms 105.161 ms
8 att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net (12.119.140.30) 45.732 ms 49.759 ms 44.477 ms
9 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net (209.123.11.202) 83.63 ms 47.588 ms 44.669 ms
10 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net (64.21.102.2) 88.373 ms 44.516 ms 44.213 ms
.....
--
"The most overlooked advantage of owning a computer is that if they foul up there's no law against whacking them around a bit." |
|
podunk
Premium
join:2002-10-21
Des Moines, IA
| reply to Dogbert
normal here too....
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 11 ms 13 ms 11 ms 10.16.16.1
2 9 ms 7 ms 10 ms 12.215.13.33
3 22 ms 22 ms 24 ms 12.215.6.22
4 21 ms 26 ms 22 ms gbr5-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.2]
5 24 ms 27 ms 25 ms tbr1-p013501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.41]
6 41 ms 46 ms 82 ms tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.1]
7 71 ms 41 ms 42 ms gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]
8 44 ms 44 ms 42 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]
9 48 ms 43 ms 50 ms 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.202]
10 43 ms 45 ms 50 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
11 42 ms 62 ms 46 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
--
"Don't be so humble - you are not that great." |
|
HTHIS
join:2003-01-20
Clinton, IA
| reply to Dogbert
NO mine have been awful MY first hop is really high again this has been going on for a few days
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 76 ms 146 ms 32 ms 10.17.0.1
2 76 ms 163 ms 87 ms 12.215.14.1
3 196 ms 131 ms 52 ms 12.215.4.66
4 225 ms 144 ms 145 ms gbr5-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.2]
5 26 ms 92 ms 47 ms tbr1-p013501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.41]
6 64 ms 72 ms 48 ms tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.1]
7 90 ms 176 ms 96 ms gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]
8 91 ms 121 ms 125 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]
9 71 ms 94 ms 141 ms 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.202]
10 153 ms 94 ms 112 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
11 98 ms 113 ms 170 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Trace complete. |
|
Thrawn2
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Premium
join:2001-04-09
Davenport, IA | reply to Dogbert
yeah my pings have also been having little problems. PHASE II should be here pretty soon.
--
If i had the money i would do COKE. |
|
z9_87
Ill - Ini
Premium
join:2001-09-23
Urbana, IL
clubs:
 ·Insight Communicat..
| reply to Dogbert
hmmm... all i can say is WOW!
1 * * * Request timed out.
2 166 ms 85 ms 30 ms 10.17.168.1
3 434 ms 246 ms 106 ms 12.215.14.33
4 449 ms 384 ms 169 ms 12.215.1.118
5 354 ms 419 ms 548 ms gbr6-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.6]
6 395 ms 313 ms 252 ms tbr2-p013601.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.61]
7 288 ms 329 ms 232 ms ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37]
8 254 ms 298 ms 282 ms dcr1-so-3-3-0.Chicago.cw.net [208.175.10.93]
9 117 ms 103 ms 235 ms dcr2-loopback.Washington.cw.net [206.24.226.100]
10 374 ms 170 ms 259 ms bhr1-pos-10-0.Sterling1dc2.cw.net [206.24.238.16
6]
11 415 ms 400 ms 158 ms csr11-ve242.Sterling2dc3.cw.net [216.109.66.99]
12 358 ms 339 ms 248 ms 216.109.84.162
13 74 ms 214 ms 188 ms vl31.bas2-m.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.120.146]
14 430 ms 403 ms 270 ms w20.www.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.125.73]
Trace complete.
--
Lag free since 4/30/03! |
|
Dogbert
Premium
join:2002-03-28
Brookings, SD
| reply to Dogbert
Well, I'm hoping mine was a glitch. It's been really good the last two nights.
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 14 ms 10 ms 27 ms 10.18.xxx.1
2 10 ms 14 ms 13 ms 12.xxx.17.161
3 28 ms 14 ms 13 ms 12.xxx.5.166
4 27 ms 41 ms 14 ms gar1-p370.mpsmn.ip.att.net
5 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms gbr6-p30.cgcil.ip.att.net
6 55 ms 41 ms 41 ms tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net
7 109 ms 42 ms 55 ms gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net
8 55 ms 55 ms 54 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net
9 55 ms 82 ms 69 ms 1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net
10 55 ms 55 ms 55 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net
11 55 ms 54 ms 97 ms www.dslreports.com |
|
Dogbert
Premium
join:2002-03-28
Brookings, SD
| Hey, I just noticed that my 4th, 5th and 6th Hop now have a different router that they go through for DSL reports.
Hop 4 changed from St. Louis to Minneapolis
Hop 5 changed from St. Louis to Chicago
Hop 6 changed from Washington, DC to New York
First time I've ever had these new routers. I wonder what's up with that? |
|
marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO
| reply to Dogbert
Probably all the students done with finals using the net in combination with everyone doing last minute paper research 
(assuming SD State has finals this week like a lot of other schools).
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu
or Go to
»isca.whiteboard.net for more information (and java telnet access) |
|
z9_87
Ill - Ini
Premium
join:2001-09-23
Urbana, IL
clubs:
·Insight Communicat..
| said by marigolds  :
Probably all the students done with finals using the net in combination with everyone doing last minute paper research
(assuming SD State has finals this week like a lot of other schools).
speaking of this... Today in one of my finals at school, the whole class was on the computer. (the final was on the computer) Everyone was using the internet at once. Now my school only has 1 T1 for all 3 schools. So every computer in our lab at the high school was being used plus some at the other 2 schools I'm sure. Talk about slowwww. 1min+ for each page to load. Made the thing take forever! It was pretty funny to watch people keep reloading though only to have to wait longer.
--
Lag free since 5/15/03! |
|
linux
Ping 999
Premium
join:2002-08-19
Clarence, IA
clubs:
 ·Iowa Network Servi..
edited
| reply to Dogbert
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 13 ms 18 ms 15 ms 10.17.0.1
2 13 ms 12 ms 11 ms 12.215.14.1
3 87 ms 74 ms 70 ms 12.215.1.114
4 41 ms 39 ms 47 ms gbr5-p80.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.5.218]
5 69 ms 77 ms 100 ms tbr1-p013501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.41]
6 167 ms 165 ms 135 ms tbr1-p013601.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.57]
7 * 166 ms 155 ms gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]
8 93 ms 81 ms 153 ms att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]
9 82 ms 82 ms 64 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
10 164 ms 151 ms 186 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
11 120 ms 68 ms 74 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Trace complete.
Mine haven't been the greatest either. Oh well. Better than 900ms I suppose --
MOS 31F - MOS 31U 1991-1999
[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 00:44:54] |
|
