Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » DSL ISPs get a warning » Re: DSL ISPs get a warning
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
13
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Re: DSL ISPs get a warning »
« Re: DSL ISPs get a warning  
AuthorAll Replies

Anon
 reply to klambert
Re: DSL Providers Better Shape Up!

Well I guess I'm the first person you've come across who is happy with their DSL service. Who is my ISP? Linline. ( www.linkline.com ) I have had DSL with them for about 10 months and during that time I have had a total noticed downtime of about 6 hours, and that was GTE's clearly fault as indicated by the DSL modem (fujitsu: blinking modem light).

I have recommended them to all my friends who want to get DSL, 4 of them have signed up and out of the 5 of us only 1 has had issues, his phone line was hosed, couldn't keep sync for more then a few hours a day. But all seems to well for him now.

Great service, Great reliability, and STATIC IPs to boot. Linkline is my recommendation.

note: PPPoE Sucks, anyone who would choose to use an ISP with a PPPoE DSL implimentation is an idiot.


klambert
Seti Rocks
ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-07-20
Dallas, TX
clubs:

reply to ronnieg56$
The problem with many DSL providers is that their advertising (and sales personnel) are misleading at best and downright fraudulent at worst. While it is true that DSL contracts "clearly" state that the speeds offered are not guaranteed (usually in paragraph 27 on page 12 of the fine-print contract), they are deliberately misrepresenting what we will receive for our $39.95 (or so). Needless to say, they rarely deliver what they have promised. I have yet to hear a single instance of a DSL subscriber who was: (1) set up in a timely manner (giving some reasonable lee-way), (2) received a connection speed set up at the speed contracted or agreed upon (common downgrades), (3) did not have regular service outages, and had decent customer service in response to complaints.

WHile I generally do not advocate government intervention (the "Laurel & Hardy Show"), if the DSL providers (including the phone cos & ISPs) don't get their act together soon there will be governmental intervention -- which will probably make no one happy.

Its about full disclosure and delivering what you promise without hiding caveats and limitations in the fine print -- trust me, I read have to deal with those types of contracts every day in my law practice.
Forums » DSL ISPs get a warningRe: DSL ISPs get a warning »
« Re: DSL ISPs get a warning  


Friday, 04-Dec 09:48:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [142] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [108] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [90] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [72] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [69] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Do I have a problem due to AVAST? [Security]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· I'd like some info on this Genset [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Millenicom vs. Verizon "broadband?" [Millenicom]