Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Caging VoIP Technology » Regulation Free VOIP
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
It's about choice »
« Does no one else have a problem with this?  
clecrupt9

join:2002-01-22
GA

Re: Regulation Free VOIP

said by rradina See Profile:

Don't the digital cellular networks do the same thing? Don't all of our voices at one point get digitized over the PSTN?


Yes they do.

I agree with you, what is getting Vonage is that they offer residential users dialtone and a PSTN number that a standard telephone uses. Its pure BS to say this isnt telecommunications service.

MN said they didnt care what the technology behind this was, you and the callee used a telephone so......its telecommunications. I see most people seeing this way. In addition in order to provide dialtone in most states you must be certified by the State, even if you dont own a switch. Because VoIP is information service, these rules dont apply.

Now I am all for VoIP, but they cant expect to always not have to play by certain rules. This will be the subject of lots of debate, not just for Vonage but for telephony as a whole.

murdok6100
Avatar. Get It, Avatar?

join:2002-06-20

Re: Regulation Free VOIP

said by clecrupt9 See Profile:
said by rradina See Profile:

Don't the digital cellular networks do the same thing? Don't all of our voices at one point get digitized over the PSTN?


Yes they do.

I agree with you, what is getting Vonage is that they offer residential users dialtone and a PSTN number that a standard telephone uses. Its pure BS to say this isnt telecommunications service.

MN said they didnt care what the technology behind this was, you and the callee used a telephone so......its telecommunications. I see most people seeing this way. In addition in order to provide dialtone in most states you must be certified by the State, even if you dont own a switch. Because VoIP is information service, these rules dont apply.

Now I am all for VoIP, but they cant expect to always not have to play by certain rules. This will be the subject of lots of debate, not just for Vonage but for telephony as a whole.
Bull$hit -

So next time I make an MPG message for my mommy and send it VIA email it should be regulated?

What of video-teleconfrencing?

Murdok610
clecrupt9

join:2002-01-22
GA


Re: Regulation Free VOIP

said by murdok6100 See Profile:
said by clecrupt9 See Profile:


Bull$hit -

So next time I make an MPG message for my mommy and send it VIA email it should be regulated?

What of video-teleconfrencing?

Murdok610
Email, teleconferencing, video conferencing, arent provided as replacement of your landline. You can't lump all voip into one category, neither can the regulators.

The problem is that hybrid IP providers are 50% at least just like the telephone company. You use a standard telephone, you get standard dialtone, get a standard 164 address(phone number), and your calls route to and through the PSTN, unless its CPE to CPE.

People arent stupid, what I have described is telecommunications, be it an advanced version or not.

Also with email, messenger, ect you arent using a telephone or telephone numbers. The funny thing is that the only reason Vonage and the others use telephone numbers is that we are all so used to them, most people wouldnt use a devise for talking unless it has a key pad. SIP(the protocol of choice) will allow you to dial by something similar to an email address. If you dialed by an address it would be even harder to regulate that, as it looks less like telecommunications.

Weather these companies that provide that are to be certified as competitive exchanges, I dont know. But what broadband phone is and Free world dialup, or Net2phone calling card are, is three different things. I dont think pure VoIP will get regulated, but hybrid might. Even if it does become regulated, it doesnt mean the end of the low costs calling world.
[text was edited by author 2003-08-21 10:15:58]
Forums » Caging VoIP TechnologyIt's about choice »
« Does no one else have a problem with this?  


Sunday, 29-Nov 06:02:12 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [73] Weekend Open Thread
· [72] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· DIR-655 New Beta 1.32b09 [D-Link]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October 13, 2009 [Security]
· Shareport problem on DIR-655 [D-Link]
· Windows 7 driver for the 2wire wireless adapter? [AT&T U-verse]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Child Porn Laws - The Traci Lords Argument [Canadian Chat]
· [Tomato] WRT54-GL LCP appears to be disconnected - VOIP with Int [Linksys]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Blue Ray: Samsung BD-P3600 or LG BD390 [Audio/Video Chat]