clecrupt9
join:2002-01-22
GA
| reply to murdok6100
Re: Regulation Free VOIP
said by murdok6100  :
said by clecrupt9 :
Bull$hit -
So next time I make an MPG message for my mommy and send it VIA email it should be regulated?
What of video-teleconfrencing?
Murdok610
Email, teleconferencing, video conferencing, arent provided as replacement of your landline. You can't lump all voip into one category, neither can the regulators.
The problem is that hybrid IP providers are 50% at least just like the telephone company. You use a standard telephone, you get standard dialtone, get a standard 164 address(phone number), and your calls route to and through the PSTN, unless its CPE to CPE.
People arent stupid, what I have described is telecommunications, be it an advanced version or not.
Also with email, messenger, ect you arent using a telephone or telephone numbers. The funny thing is that the only reason Vonage and the others use telephone numbers is that we are all so used to them, most people wouldnt use a devise for talking unless it has a key pad. SIP(the protocol of choice) will allow you to dial by something similar to an email address. If you dialed by an address it would be even harder to regulate that, as it looks less like telecommunications.
Weather these companies that provide that are to be certified as competitive exchanges, I dont know. But what broadband phone is and Free world dialup, or Net2phone calling card are, is three different things. I dont think pure VoIP will get regulated, but hybrid might. Even if it does become regulated, it doesnt mean the end of the low costs calling world.
[text was edited by author 2003-08-21 10:15:58] |
