republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Texas State Law Won't Stop Spam » How about if it contains . . .
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
6
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


newview
Ex .. Ex .. Exactly
Premium
join:2001-10-01
Parsonsburg, MD
How about if it contains . . .

A D V or A*D*V or A-D-V or A/D/V or any of hundreds of other permutations. Requiring ADV is just plain ridiculous and will not make the slightest difference.


SYNACK
Just Firewall It
Premium,Mod
join:2001-03-05
Venice, CA
·Comcast Formerly ..

Host:
Networking
Virtual Private Ne..
Netgear
ZyXEL
California had this "ADV:" requirement for quite a while, but I have yet to see spam that adheres to this.

Even if it won't make a difference, SPAM that does not follow this requirement is automatically illegal and the California attorney general actively hunts those spammers down if they operate in California ( »caag.state.ca.us/spam/ ).


carynoc
Just Ducky
Premium
join:2003-07-17
Whitmore Lake, MI

reply to newview
Only ridiculous if it is not enforced. We let spammers get away with so much! And given that many anti-spammers seem to find the hunt (shutting down a website, for example -- for which the response from spammers is to move to another website) more interesting than finding practical solutions to the problem, spammers may get away with abusing individual and businesses rights for years to come. I have yet to see a even one solid technical or legal solution to the problem. What makes spamming all that different from viruses and worms? Do they not have the same adverse economic implications? Could you imagine what your snailmail mailbox would look like if snailmail advertising were free? If porn were sent to your mailbox? The laws haven't caught up with the crimes, the current laws aren't being enforced, and general thinking is that is the problem is difficult to stop, so many just filter out the problem and try to live in ignorant bliss. Isn't it easier to support a sub-industry that lives off of spammers -- by that I mean all the companies that sell us filtering software, tracking software, et al. What would happen if all that money went to stopping the problem, not masking it? Just a question, just my opinion
--
Stop Spam!
Forums » Texas State Law Won't Stop Spam


Tuesday, 02-Dec 04:54:08 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [94] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [69] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [57] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [17] FCC To Vote On Free National Wireless Broadband
· [14] Clearwire May Slow WiMax Build
· [7] Embarq Rejected Higher Offer
· [7] Hawaii Telecom Files For Bankruptcy
· [6] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Is this a good thing for the net? [news,99366]
· Upverting DVD players vs Blue ray DVD players. [General Questions]
· Level 80 PVP gear info? [World of Warcraft]
· Notice, new uTorrent Alpha may be able to evade throttling [TekSavvy]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Maintaince Tonight or tomorrow? [TekSavvy]
· Coalition Government Possible? [TekSavvy]
· [WotLK] Starting the Rep Grind [World of Warcraft]
· [WotLK] PVP gear at 80 [World of Warcraft]
· Please someone from Verizon help me... [Verizon FIOS TV]