 WildcatboyPremium,Mod join:2000-10-30 Toronto, ON kudos:2 Host: Security Product V.. Security
| Firewall Poll OK. Here's the question for members or those who frequent the security forum, registered or not. I would like to ask you all to participate so we can get a more accurate result.
|
|
 Zhen-XjellProlific BunnyPremium,VIP,ExMod 2001-04 join:2000-10-08 Bordentown, NJ | Wonderful poll WCB... always WCB Amazing! I use a Linksys Router and ZAP 2.6. It will be very interesting to see what everyone here uses. |
|

| reply to Wildcatboy Wow more people use Tiny 2
[text was edited by author 2001-05-03 10:03:22] |
|
|
|
 ethics$Premium join:2000-12-27 Brooklyn, NY | reply to Wildcatboy Wildcat,
The poll is less than accurate. I know you wanted to split who's using what but you need to separate the software/vs Hardware firewalls. -- Folding can save a life!
|
|
 N9ZNSecurity Is A Community Effort join:2001-03-29 Tampa, FL | reply to Wildcatboy Some of us do run more than a single OS and many of us have multiple boxes running different Fire Walls / Dedicated Routers.
What are you looking for just our favorite, the favorite for each OS, or what's on each machine protected? 
My guess is our favorite blocking device / program.
Gee, we always have to get complicated it's just our nature. |
|
 WildcatboyPremium,Mod join:2000-10-30 Toronto, ON kudos:2 Host: Security Product V.. Security
| reply to Wildcatboy
Actually the question is not as complicated. It's not about what you recommend or your favourites, although most people use what they would recommend. It's about the security software or hardware that you use and believe would keep you safe.
For majority of home users it's either one of those firewalls or A router alone or a combination of both or a combination of a router/software firewall/proxy server. If none of those options match your category then there's always others. -- You can catch the Devil, but you can't hold him long. |
|
 gwionwild colonial boyPremium,ExMod 2001-08 join:2000-12-28 Pittsburgh, PA kudos:1 | reply to Wildcatboy Tiny firewall, nat router with packet inspection enabled and wan access disabled and with various critical LAN ports filtered at the router. Sometimes, I bring up a filtering proxy server, but have found that it slows down the connection enough that I don't find it all that necessary, anymore. Thing I like about running it is that I can set logging and get a comprehensive look at my traffic, short of the trouble of packet capture. Overall, I've found that a NAT router and a good quality packet filter like ZA or Tiny will nail down a home or small business network pretty nicely. Along with a good virus scanner and some means to detect trojan activity, you have a good core system, without giving up any usability or speed. Proxy servers, if desired, will slow down your connection a little bit (or, sometimes, a lot), but they can add a lot of versatility and logging capability even on a stand alone machine. For example, you can set rules in a lot of them that can block all sorts of popups and ads, or restrict access to certain IP's much more easily than editing the hosts file... the price is a decrease in speed, often proportional to the complexity of your filters. Offsite proxies add another dimension to security, but come with dramatic speed penalties, most of the time. Proxying through your ISP or a third party server masks your IP and physically separates you from the machine at the other end... with the trade off being that many offsite proxy services can cut you back to modem speeds, and can restrict the types of content you can functionally view and interact with. Good thread... later on, maybe we could trade notes on security support software. I have a lot of little apps and applets that don't really qualify as firewall components, but which really help out in special situations and maintenance... I'm sure everyone has their own, too, and we might all find some new tools worth having... -- Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times he will pick himself up and carry on. - Sir Winston Churchill |
|
 | reply to Wildcatboy
What if we use multiple methods? I use WinXP ICS (a NAT) which, being a NAT, does obfuscate my network somewhat. Each XP machine also has the "Personal Firewall" enabled. I have ZoneAlarm on the Win9x & NT machines as well. May try the new ZoneAlarm in the XP boxes as a backup. -- Linux- unix built for amateurs by the unemployable. |
|
 JerryC23Character Counts 40,41,43Premium,ExMod 1999-03 join:1999-10-08 Humble, TX | reply to Wildcatboy
How About -- NONE ???
Is that unthinkable ? |
|
 ethics$Premium join:2000-12-27 Brooklyn, NY | said by JerryC23: NONE ???
Is that unthinkable ?
No, but ignorant and dangerous. -- Folding can save a life!
|
|
 jaykaykay4 Ever YoungPremium,MVM join:2000-04-13 Scottsdale, AZ kudos:19 Reviews:
·Speakeasy
| said by ethics13: said by JerryC23: NONE ???
Is that unthinkable ?
No, but ignorant and dangerous.
Yes. Agreed. It certainly is, to quote Merriam Webster, "lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified". However, it might be a valuable addition to WCB's poll, perhaps. It would give some insight into what additions might be valuable to this forum, if any. -- JKK
Age is a very high price to pay for my maturity, so if I can't stay young, I can at least stay immature!
|
|
 GizmoWho me? I live here.Premium,MVM join:2000-08-19 Funny Farm kudos:1 | reply to Wildcatboy
Re: Firewall Poll My neighbor paid the price for not having a software firewall and anti-virus software!!;) -- ~gizmo |
|
 SkipdawgThe OriginalPremium,ExMod 2001-03 join:2001-04-19 Mount Vernon, WA | reply to JerryC23
Re: How About -- said by JerryC23: NONE ???
Is that unthinkable ?
Now days with all the jerks and weirdos out there you need all the protection you can get.
Just today I've had 7 blocks with ZA |
|
 kcazzieOne Of Jerry's KidsPremium join:2000-08-13 Morton Grove, IL | reply to Zhen-Xjell
Re: Firewall Poll said by Zhen-Xjell: Wonderful poll WCB... always WCB Amazing! I use a Linksys Router and ZAP 2.6. It will be very interesting to see what everyone here uses.
Same here!Linky and the free version of ZA!;) |
|
 RocktagonSlightly BentPremium join:2000-11-04 Chattaroy, WA | reply to Wildcatboy AtGuard and ZAP. I was only allowed to vote once  I should have read the whole thread before placing my vote. I always recommend ZA. I believe anyone can learn to use it without to much effort. Good job WCB! -- nam et ipsa scientia potestas est
|
|
 BlitzenZeusBurnt Out CynicPremium join:2000-01-13 kudos:2 | You voted for AtGuard first right Rocktagon? |
|
 | reply to Wildcatboy My vote goes to ZA.  |
|
 BlitzenZeusBurnt Out CynicPremium join:2000-01-13 kudos:2 | reply to Wildcatboy Looks like nobody trusts just a proxy server, or lockdown to protect them. I don't blame them. |
|
 ZuhaibKing Of FoolsPremium,ExMod 2001 join:2000-06-29 San Francisco, CA | reply to Wildcatboy What about Ipchains or Netfilters???? |
|
 | reply to Wildcatboy What about Microsoft ISA Server, Checkpoint FW-1, or Raptor? I noticed you didn't list any of the big commercial ones.
Cheers, CA |
|