republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The Invisible Threshold » Riding the fence
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
It appears to me that . . . . »
« DirectPC (Satellite offering) did this tactice!  
AuthorAll Replies


tonytoca

join:2000-12-18
Gainesville, FL
 reply to micl
Re: Riding the fence

Touche !!!!...."Unlimited Connection" does not mean "fat pipe" does it? I was duped into thinkin unlimited connection meant "always-on" aka no fuzzy ack tones purring down my telephone line.

E Pluribus Unum


AthlGrond
Premium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
·Comcast

reply to micl
said by micl See Profile:
Splitting hairs is no defense.
LOL, tell that to Clinton.

Seriously, legally it is a defense.

Only morally is it a crime.

BTW they no longer use the term. I guess they decided they didn't offer unlimited service anymore.


micl
Visit Lovely Downtown Port Starboard
Premium
join:2001-10-25
Silver Spring, MD


reply to AthlGrond
said by AthlGrond See Profile:
They never said "unlimited bandwidth", they said an "unlimited connection". (or something equally vague) The running theory is that the claim is to the fact that you can stay connected as much as you like (unlike dialup).

WTF does 'unlimited connection' mean? I would argue that using the term "unlimited" is an accepted term in the marketplace that means "unlimited bandwidth". If unlimited connection means "always on", then I think they would have used that term since that is the accepted terminology that most everyone else uses in the industry.

Splitting hairs is no defense.

[edit: clarity]
--
If I don't see you in the future, I'll see you in the pasture

[text was edited by author 2003-09-15 15:11:52]


AthlGrond
Premium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
·Comcast

reply to micl
said by micl See Profile:
..."unlimited bandwidth", then Comcast in running afoul of fair trade practices and should be held accountable. ...
They never said "unlimited bandwidth", they said an "unlimited connection". (or something equally vague) The running theory is that the claim is to the fact that you can stay connected as much as you like (unlike dialup).

And if you read the TOS you will see that the connection is most certainly limited. Although there isn't a clear bandwidth limit stated, there are plenty of other kinds of limits. (No servers for example.)

I don't think any legal action is going to work in this case.


micl
Visit Lovely Downtown Port Starboard
Premium
join:2001-10-25
Silver Spring, MD

reply to coastdweller4
said by coastdweller4 See Profile:
Economics

As soon as you state what your limit is, someone will undersell you for the sake of taking your business whether they can handle the added business or not. Today, everyone thinks they can be a broadband, webhosting, ISP, provider.

Comcast is obviously protecting their assets (Their customer base) yet allowing the customer to think there is no limit, and that friends is riding the fence.

Nothing wrong with it.
Whether they are protecting their assets or not, they can't just lie to their customers in the name of competition.

If any customers reasonably rely on their representation of unlimited bandwidth and then get disconnected for excercising their "unlimited bandwidth", then Comcast in running afoul of fair trade practices and should be held accountable.
--
If I don't see you in the future, I'll see you in the pasture
Forums » The Invisible ThresholdIt appears to me that . . . . »
« DirectPC (Satellite offering) did this tactice!  


Friday, 04-Dec 08:30:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [142] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [106] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [88] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [67] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [67] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Usenet Services- Clarification [TekSavvy]
· Do I have a problem due to AVAST? [Security]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· AV-Comparatives PUA test results [Security]