republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » California Spam Bill » Nice
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
115
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The thing I like is..... »
« Loopholes?  
AuthorAll Replies


Lex Luthor
Premium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Hicksville, NY

Host:
OptimumOnline
Users Find Hot Deals
Users find Hot Dea..
Requests for Hot D..
Nice

One important thing, as I see it, is that you'll actually be able to go after the companies whose products are being advertised in the spam as well as their bank accounts.

I wonder how spammers are going to deal with this. Obviously, a spammer can't tell if an email address they bought on one of those CDs or found on the net is located in California. If they sent out a 1 mil piece of spam, aren't they going to hit 100k California people with it? That could be very costly under this new law.

I'm sure they'll find a way around it, somehow.

I still wonder how difficult enforcement will be.

MrJames

join:2003-05-19
Jacksonville, FL
Excellent point. Many companies will have to re-think their "marketing" strategy since they will be liable under this new bill.


amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

said by MrJames See Profile:
Excellent point. Many companies will have to re-think their "marketing" strategy since they will be liable under this new bill.
If you look at the entire distribution chain in just about any industry (excluding services), it is clear that producers are not in complete control of distribution. This will be a huge fiasco if lawmakers intend to attempt to penalize manufacturers for the spam of distributors. The law must address this in some manner.
--
Time is an abstract concept invented by carbon based life forms to monitor their constant decay.-Thunderclese


Lex Luthor
Premium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Hicksville, NY

Host:
OptimumOnline
Users Find Hot Deals
Users find Hot Dea..
Requests for Hot D..

said by amenite See Profile:
said by MrJames See Profile:
Excellent point. Many companies will have to re-think their "marketing" strategy since they will be liable under this new bill.
If you look at the entire distribution chain in just about any industry (excluding services), it is clear that producers are not in complete control of distribution. This will be a huge fiasco if lawmakers intend to attempt to penalize manufacturers for the spam of distributors. The law must address this in some manner.

If someone is spamming Norton Systemworks, for example, I can't image it's going to be Symantec that's going to be liable, it's the company reselling Norton Systemworks that's going to be liable.

I'd guess the law must be written that it's not the company being advertised in the spam is liable, it must be the company that is benefiting from the spam.

[text was edited by author 2003-09-24 10:22:39]


amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL


said by Lex Luthor See Profile:

If someone is spamming Norton Systemworks, for example, I can't image it's going to be Symantec that's going to be liable, it's the company reselling Norton Systemworks that's going to be liable.

I'd guess the law must be written that it's not the company being advertised in the spam is liable, it must be the company that is benefiting from the spam.

[text was edited by author 2003-09-24 10:22:39]

The article says plainly:
quote:

The anti-spam legislation targets not only the firms that package and send the unwanted e-mails to consumers, but also the companies whose products and services are being advertised.
This is all I have to go on right now, and it implies Symantec/Norton *would or could* be liable in your example, as their products are being spammed. It would seem unreasonable to do so, but there's not enough information here to evaluate this.
--
Time is an abstract concept invented by carbon based life forms to monitor their constant decay.-Thunderclese

snkeyes3

join:2003-09-23

You're missing one key point:
Most of the spammed products are fraudulant or stolen.

For example: The version of Norton Systemworks being sold via SPAM is a PIRATED COPY!! Symantec has no responsibility in this matter, only the Spammer and the Pirate are liable.


amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

said by snkeyes3 See Profile:
You're missing one key point:
Most of the spammed products are fraudulant or stolen.

For example: The version of Norton Systemworks being sold via SPAM is a PIRATED COPY!! Symantec has no responsibility in this matter, only the Spammer and the Pirate are liable.
And that's only one example. The are thousands if not millions of potential scenarios involving perfectly legitimate products passing through normal distribution channels. The issue is not addressed in the article. I'd like to see a draft of the legislation to see exactly what's being proposed here.
--
Time is an abstract concept invented by carbon based life forms to monitor their constant decay.-Thunderclese


CatSnak
RIP Splashy - We miss you
Premium
join:2001-05-06
Lakeside, CA


said by amenite See Profile:
said by snkeyes3 See Profile:
You're missing one key point:
Most of the spammed products are fraudulant or stolen.

For example: The version of Norton Systemworks being sold via SPAM is a PIRATED COPY!! Symantec has no responsibility in this matter, only the Spammer and the Pirate are liable.
And that's only one example. The are thousands if not millions of potential scenarios involving perfectly legitimate products passing through normal distribution channels. The issue is not addressed in the article. I'd like to see a draft of the legislation to see exactly what's being proposed here.

Here is a link to the bill as it was introduced:

»info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_···ced.html

And here is an analysis of the bill:

»info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_···oor.html

And here is the enrolled version:

»info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_···led.html

[edit] Corrected links to the right bill.
--
Director of Communications for the Crunchenstein Project
Join Us at Team Starfire
Join the BBRBF clan


[text was edited by author 2003-09-24 14:13:00]

[text was edited by author 2003-09-24 14:32:18]


amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

said by CatSnak See Profile:
Here is a link to the bill as it was introduced:

»info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_···ced.html

And here is an analysis of the bill:

»info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_···oor.html

And here is the enrolled version:

»info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_···led.html


The bill looks fairly innocuous, unless you're a spammer!
From the second link, the analysis, I found this section interesting:
quote:

OPPOSITION : (Verified 5/19/03)

American Civil Liberties Union
American Electronics Association
California Alliance for Consumer Protection
Challenger One
Direct Marketing Association
Internet Alliance

So what is "Internet Alliance" anyway? I wonder where their funds originate.
--
Time is an abstract concept invented by carbon based life forms to monitor their constant decay.-Thunderclese
Forums » California Spam BillThe thing I like is..... »
« Loopholes?  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 23:32:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [125] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [94] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [67] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [62] Verizon's Hanging Up On Rural America
· [48] Verizon's Higher ETFs Annoy Senator
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [31] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [24] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Massive Slowdowns? [cover,1584]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· House inspector failed to find major gas leak [Home Repair & Improvement]
· I had enough! Let's go out on the street!! STOP THROTTLING!! [Canadian Broadband]
· [Connectivity] Slow Route and Bad RDNS [Comcast HSI]
· netTalk tk6000 [VOIP Tech Chat]