Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Digital Music Wars » the Overlooked Problem
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Ari

@206.64.x.x

reply to statemachine
Re: the Overlooked Problem

>>The radio stations are rebroadcasting onto a different medium in a different market and not paying the royalties associated with airing shows, music, and actors residuals. They know they're trying to pull a fast one here.

That statement is simply not true, since I can personally show you reciepts from my station which pays the royalties.

The deeper implication of the article that had to do with webcasting licensing was not to say how broadcasters can get away without paying licenses. That is simply silly. The point is that for all the rules and licenses organizations such as DI DO pay, there is an equal amount of "infighting" within the industry that contradicts even itself. And the point is that they use the monopoly they have to make their claims sound right.

Here's just one example of what I am talking about that's not widely known:
As you can find on the RIAA site, the DMCA interpretation of the following... (»www.riaa.com/Licensing-Licen-3a.cfm)
"14. Transmission of copyright management information. If technically feasible, transmissions by the webcaster must be accompanied by the information encoded in the sound recording by the copyright owner that identifies the title of the song, the featured artist and other related information (if any)."

That's fine, so a station such as DI tries hard to keep all the metadata so this would be followed. But then I have known a certain "big" organization I won't mention the name, trying to make webcasters remove metadata from the stream as a condition for a private license agreement, in hopes that programs like streamripper would be next to worthless (you wouldn't know what you recorded for the most part). So while everyone is suing claiming "you are not DMCA compliant", a few are also trying to make you break the DMCA rules at the same time, the ones they don't like. I call that absurd.

So I wasn't talking about avoiding license fees at all, I don't know what exactly gave you that idea (it even says in the article we are paying license fees, now that I think about it.)

sorry if this is quickly put together, it's 8am & I am sleepy
-
Forums » Digital Music Wars


Thursday, 21-Aug 04:06:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [99] Was FiOS a Good Idea?
· [77] Landscaping, Courtesy of AT&T?
· [76] ISPs Whine About Network Neutrality 'Paranoia'
· [68] FCC Finally Issues Comcast Throttling Order
· [56] Google Launches White Space Broadband Website
· [56] Craig Moffett: Network Upgrades Are For Ninnies
· [52] Qwest, Unions Strike Deal
· [51] Did Apple iPhone Fix Make Problems Worse?
· [49] Olympics Didn't Cause The Exaflood
· [49] AT&T Cooking Up New VoIP Product
Most people now reading
· Criss Angel revealed. [56k lookout! (broadband heavy)]
· [Speed] Comcast to throttle individual users; all protocols [Comcast HSI]
· New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1 [Linksys]
· How do you file things on your computer? [General Questions]
· Neighbor Yanks a Power Line & Voltage Overloads the Block [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [XP Home] FAT32 vs NTFS [Microsoft help]
· Tomato/MLPPP released (evade throttle or bond two DSL lines) [TekSavvy]
· Can't install AT&T Online Protection with Vista Business [AT&T Midwest]
· Is something missing? (Stove question) [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Best Dual Wan Router [Networking]