Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » California to Regulate VoIP? » Opening Pandora's box
Uniqs:
527
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Naivete is no defense »
« this is a b*tch  

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

Opening Pandora's box

In my opinion, VOIP is just like any other kind of internet packets. It's really no different from say, sending a file via the net, etc. It's just used as a transport for voice communications that is set up to resemble telephone service for ease of use.

It should *not* be taxed. It should *not* be treated as "long distance" and charged more.

...but therein lies the rub. States and the Federal Government love the taxes and fees and social programs they tack onto telephone service. They are worried that everyone will switch to VOIP and dump POTS and they will lose their cash cow...

.... So, their answer is to treat VOIP the same as POTS and preserve their cash cow.

They aren't the same... but one thing is. TAXES.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

CanOpener4

join:2003-06-23
Brooklyn, NY

Re: Opening Pandora's box

said by KrK See Profile:
In my opinion, VOIP is just like any other kind of internet packets. It's really no different from say, sending a file via the net, etc. It's just used as a transport for voice communications that is set up to resemble telephone service for ease of use.
Exactly! Taxing VoIP appears to be very fightable in court, does it not? The question is, will they?

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

Re: Opening Pandora's box

said by CanOpener4 See Profile:
Exactly! Taxing VoIP appears to be very fightable in court, does it not? The question is, will they?
I think it's a court battle for now, but once States/Congress passes a law(s) treating VOIP as a service like telephone service the battle will be lost.

This will really impact businesses who use VOIP over their IP networks to cut costs methinks.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by CanOpener4 See Profile:
Exactly! Taxing VoIP appears to be very fightable in court, does it not? The question is, will they?
Trouble is, it may be easier for them to "roll over" and just pay the taxes; they still may be a better price than the telcos. And being taxed adds instant legitimacy to VOIP services.

Whistle Dixie

@attbi.com
Do they know about Skype? www.skype.com

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

Re: Opening Pandora's box

said by Whistle Dixie:
Do they know about Skype? www.skype.com
yawn. loaded with spyware and requires the other party to have the program as well. not as elegant as real voip. is there a skypeLITE yet?
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth
Forums » California to Regulate VoIP?Naivete is no defense »
« this is a b*tch  


Friday, 04-Dec 22:42:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [69] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· DIR-655 1.31 Firmware available [D-Link]
· ZR1 VS The USN Blue Angels! [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]