Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » D-Day for Municipals » The grasp of the obvious
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
176
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« I don't have any trouble with this......  
AuthorAll Replies


ravital
Just Another Pesky Independent Nh Voter
Premium
join:2001-07-19
Merrimack, NH

The grasp of the obvious

What's amazing, is that it takes the cumulative centuries of legal expertise between 9 Supreme Court justices, to settle what any child could clearly identify as nothing more than big business buying themselves mercenary legislators, both at the local and national levels. We're sorely in need of a new Teddy Roosevelt.

Does anyone know exactly when the SC is supposed to hear this? I couldn't find that in the article (sorry if I've missed it). Thanks.

mjcrocket
Mjc

join:2000-12-02
Abingdon, MD

said by ravital See Profile:

Does anyone know exactly when the SC is supposed to hear this? I couldn't find that in the article (sorry if I've missed it). Thanks.
The SC is not hearing it! Until one of the parties involved the two referenced court cases (Eighth Circuit and the DC Circuit), appeals to the SC; the SC will not get involved. Also, just because you appeal to the SC; it does not mean the SC will hear the appeal. The SC receives far more appeals than it can ever handle; so they have to pick & choose which cases they will actually hear & rule on. The effect can still be the same. If an appeal is filed with the SC, and it is not accepted for hearing; that effectively affirms the findings of the lower court. All of this is done on the public record and is reported in the public media.

ciad

join:2003-10-28
Washington, DC

 reply to ravital
The Supreme Court has already agreed to hear the case; the briefs referred to in the article were a result of that. Oral arguments by the actual parties (State of MO arguing against, Missouri Muni League arguing in favor of preempting state law to permit muni telecom) are scheduled for January. Decision likely will be released next summer. It's an odd picture, in that the State is arguing against its own citizens being provided service in order to protect its sovereignty vis-a-vis the federal government. Meanwhile, in order to protect its prior decision, the FCC has to argue against its own authority to preempt state law -- which is why it hasn't been too active in the case.


ravital
Just Another Pesky Independent Nh Voter
Premium
join:2001-07-19
Merrimack, NH
ciad, that's good info, thanks, and welcome
Forums » D-Day for Municipals« I don't have any trouble with this......  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 08:09:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [85] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [83] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [15] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [11] Monday Evening Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [6] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
· [0] Tuesday Morning Links
· [0] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October 13, 2009 [Security]