Angrychair
join:2000-09-20
Jacksonville, FL | Well Duh
Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities, with NJ being the most densely populated state in the nation. |
|
Stewy85
Premium
join:2003-01-16
Sharon, WI
clubs:
| Well that sucks for me....there are more cows where I live than people.
But at least I still have broadband. (costs and arm and a leg though)
[text was edited by author 2003-10-31 18:43:37] |
|
Dreadwing6
Unleash The Giver2
Premium
join:2002-03-10
Da Bronx? | reply to Angrychair
And yet nyc does not have fibre like california :\ |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | reply to Angrychair
I thought Rhode Island was the most densly populated..the state is only 30x40 miles yet has over a million people in it. |
|
Wholigan
join:2001-03-28
Buffalo, NY
| reply to Angrychair
Re: Well Duh part II
Sure, these states have the highest incomes, big deal. They also have the highest cost of living as well.
What I fail to find in this article anything regarding the costs to provide broadband to rural areas. The states with the high population densities pretty much are already wired to provide broadband services while poor rural areas are not. It is simply not profitable to provide broadband services with the technology we have now. With the exception of satellite BB.
Maybe they can tell us something we don't already know. |
|
fuzydice
join:2000-12-18
Sunnyvale, CA
| reply to Dreadwing6
Re: Well Duh
i live in Ca in the SF Bay Area and i dont have fiber  i cant even get dsl stuck with 'comcast-the-monopoly' guess its better than nothing (when it works)
--
[referring to the RIAA...] These guys buy congress people like M&Ms |
|
amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs: | reply to login name
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people. |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | damn, they do pack em in down in the garden state. |
|
CharlieN
join:2001-06-12
Park Ridge, NJ
| reply to amenite
said by amenite  :
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.
New Jersey's land area is 7419 sq miles. |
|
Eat Me
join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
 ·PenTeleData
 ·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage
| reply to Angrychair
quote:
Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities
New York City, yes. New York State, no. I believe that most of New York state is farmland and wilderness. |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | reply to CharlieN
I believe that is the population per square mile he listed. |
|
mig288
Premium
join:2002-07-13
Merchantville, NJ
| reply to CharlieN
said by CharlieN :
said by amenite :
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.
New Jersey's land area is 7419 sq miles.
And I still am only stuck with Comcrap, and DSL. Give me Fiber! |
|
slavik4
join:2002-08-06
Brooklyn, NY | reply to Dreadwing6
All that is available to me in NYC is crap cable (about 600/130) and DSL ...
And this is NYC??? I want my OOL, please! (in an area not serviced by time-warner/cablevision :-\ but rather "NuVisions" :O) |
|
Nikita
Snow
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-26
clubs:
| reply to Angrychair
I though California was the most populated state in the US? Or is Jersey by square miles the most populated state?
w00t cable, sorry I just had to be happy for cable. Wouldn't trade it for anything but fiber 
--
Penguins have an organ above their eyes that converts seawater to fresh water |
|
Harddrive
Premium
join:2000-09-20
Norwich, CT
| reply to login name
You've never been to 'southern' RI or 'western' RI. Very rural. I will admit it does take longer to drive across the Dallas/Ft Worth Metroplex than RI.
--
Fortunately I keep my feathers numbered, for just such an emergency.-Foghorn Leghorn |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | Actually, I have. I have lived in Narragansett, and went to URI. |
|
Phoenix__1
join:2003-07-17
Holyoke, MA
| reply to Angrychair
said by Angrychair :
Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities, with NJ being the most densely populated state in the nation.
Massachusetts, high incomes?!? SLMAO (Sadly laughs my a** off)
To many people willing to work + lots of people in the same jobs, goods, & service as the next guy = less demand in any given spot = less workers needed & less income.
--
My friends theory about the after life or the lack of it. Once you die, god uses your soul for food. The devil is just someone or something who's been trying to tap the line & as such, also use your soul for food. |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11
| Compared to many states, yes Massholes have high incomes "on average". You are right however about the job market being saturated up here.
(btw, I think you are my closest "dslr neighbor")
--
Click Me I'm Deviant!|Click Me I'm Live! |
|
