Angrychair
join:2000-09-20
Jacksonville, FL | Well Duh Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities, with NJ being the most densely populated state in the nation. | |
|
 
Stewy85
Premium
join:2003-01-16
Sharon, WI
clubs:
| Re: Well Duh Well that sucks for me....there are more cows where I live than people.
But at least I still have broadband. (costs and arm and a leg though)
[text was edited by author 2003-10-31 18:43:37] | |
|
Dreadwing6
Unleash The Giver2
Premium
join:2002-03-10
Da Bronx? | And yet nyc does not have fibre like california :\ | |
|
 | |
| slavik4
join:2002-08-06
Brooklyn, NY | All that is available to me in NYC is crap cable (about 600/130) and DSL ...
And this is NYC??? I want my OOL, please! (in an area not serviced by time-warner/cablevision :-\ but rather "NuVisions" :O) | |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | I thought Rhode Island was the most densly populated..the state is only 30x40 miles yet has over a million people in it. | |
|
| 
amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs: | Re: Well Duh NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people. | |
|
| | login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | Re: Well Duh damn, they do pack em in down in the garden state. | |
|
| | CharlieN
join:2001-06-12
Park Ridge, NJ
| said by amenite  :
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.
New Jersey's land area is 7419 sq miles. | |
|
| | | login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | Re: Well Duh I believe that is the population per square mile he listed. | |
|
| | | |
| |
| | login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | Re: Well Duh Actually, I have. I have lived in Narragansett, and went to URI. | |
|
Wholigan
join:2001-03-28
Buffalo, NY
| Sure, these states have the highest incomes, big deal. They also have the highest cost of living as well.
What I fail to find in this article anything regarding the costs to provide broadband to rural areas. The states with the high population densities pretty much are already wired to provide broadband services while poor rural areas are not. It is simply not profitable to provide broadband services with the technology we have now. With the exception of satellite BB.
Maybe they can tell us something we don't already know. | |
|
|
|
Phoenix__1
join:2003-07-17
Holyoke, MA
| said by Angrychair :
Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities, with NJ being the most densely populated state in the nation.
Massachusetts, high incomes?!? SLMAO (Sadly laughs my a** off)
To many people willing to work + lots of people in the same jobs, goods, & service as the next guy = less demand in any given spot = less workers needed & less income.
--
My friends theory about the after life or the lack of it. Once you die, god uses your soul for food. The devil is just someone or something who's been trying to tap the line & as such, also use your soul for food. | |
|
| login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11
| Re: Well Duh Compared to many states, yes Massholes have high incomes "on average". You are right however about the job market being saturated up here.
(btw, I think you are my closest "dslr neighbor")
--
Click Me I'm Deviant!|Click Me I'm Live! | |
|
|
|
|
i cant even get dsl 
·
·
