login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | reply to Harddrive
Re: Well Duh
Actually, I have. I have lived in Narragansett, and went to URI. |
|
Harddrive
Premium
join:2000-09-20
Norwich, CT
| reply to login name
You've never been to 'southern' RI or 'western' RI. Very rural. I will admit it does take longer to drive across the Dallas/Ft Worth Metroplex than RI.
--
Fortunately I keep my feathers numbered, for just such an emergency.-Foghorn Leghorn |
|
mig288
Premium
join:2002-07-13
Merchantville, NJ
| reply to CharlieN
said by CharlieN  :
said by amenite :
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.
New Jersey's land area is 7419 sq miles.
And I still am only stuck with Comcrap, and DSL. Give me Fiber! |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | reply to CharlieN
I believe that is the population per square mile he listed. |
|
CharlieN
join:2001-06-12
Park Ridge, NJ
| reply to amenite
said by amenite :
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.
New Jersey's land area is 7419 sq miles. |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | reply to amenite
damn, they do pack em in down in the garden state. |
|
amenite
The Soylent - It's People
Premium
join:2002-11-21
Ridgewood, NJ
clubs: | reply to login name
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile
From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people. |
|
login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11 | reply to Angrychair
I thought Rhode Island was the most densly populated..the state is only 30x40 miles yet has over a million people in it. |
|
