Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Time for an Upstream Revolution » Awesome
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:

nklb
Premium
join:2000-11-17
Ann Arbor, MI
clubs:

Re: Awesome

said by KnightDreams See Profile:
Not to throw a wrench but what does upload have to do with "watching" videos.
It has plenty to do. In TCP/IP, a packet's receipt has to be acknowledged, so by downloading full on at 1.5mbps, you would need about 128kbps up just for the return packets. Now that speeds are 3mbps down, you would need even more upload.
--
for all your Linux questions

KnightDreams
Coming Back Is Slow But Coming.

join:2002-05-08
Saint Charles, MO
clubs:

Re: Awesome

I have no problem watching videos online, and I download at 2.7mbps and upload at 187kbps.
--
Frank Amo
indy0365

join:2001-08-25
Franklin, IN

Re: Awesome

I have no promlems watching videos 3/128

some_UDP_guy

@nokia.com
But in streaming video, UDP is used instead of TCP, so there aren't Acks.

_



Re: Awesome

Windows Media Encoder(realtime video feeds) uses TCP. ShoutCast(usually audio, does work with video, just a pain to set up) uses TCP. Almost all on-demand streaming is accomplished through http over TCP, simply by downloading the file as it's playing. UDP is used mostly for online games and netconferencing(which can include video) and old RealVideo streams. But we all know that RealVideo is a fading format, don't we? Also, I would like to point out that depending on packet size, the bandwidth used by ACKs varies. Obviously, bigger packets means fewer ACKs, but more retransmission if a packet gets lost. Usually the ACKs for downloading at 1.5mbps amount to a total of about 5KBps(or 40kbps). It's not a major factor on your connection, however enough to cause your downloads to seriosuly slow down by a saturated upstream. nklb's estimates are way out of proportion. A 3mbps/128kbps connection would work just fine for *just downloading*. But don't try to upload at the same time -- it will kill your download speed.

But back to the original topic, the real question is when connections like Starpower(RCN)'s 3.5mbps/768kbps with as much of that upload available as you could possibly want per month(trust me, I know people who have tested this...^.~) will become standard.
Forums » Time for an Upstream Revolution


Wednesday, 25-Nov 01:31:05 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [101] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [83] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [39] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [32] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [19] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
Most people now reading
· [Rant] Damn Sermons through my speakers! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· "ISP owners could face jail under child porn bill" - CBC [Canadian Broadband]
· Came from FIOS to Comcast and.....I'm glad I did! [Comcast HSI]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· Mysterious $800 Cash Deposit? [General Questions]
· Several MS Updates today (11/24/2009). [Security]
· Climate Change Scandal Erupts After Email Hack. [Security]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]