Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Felony By Proxy » Ignorance of the Law....
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

DSL Oberst

join:2001-11-29

reply to Kaltes
Re: Ignorance of the Law....

said by Kaltes See Profile:

Very well said. I am glad to see that at least one other forum user here is shocked at how accepting most of the posters here are of saddling grandma and grandpa with the risk of federal prison simply because they aren't computer security experts.

All those same posters are sitting back armchair-quarterback/general style making legal commentary when they have absolutely no clue what they are talking about.

See my reply post to BosstonesOwn.
Very well, if the users are not to have responsibility, who should be responsible for the security of a user's machine?
That is truly the question at stake here, as that is the questions this entire bill is based on.

str7

join:2003-07-04
canada

It's not because you're machine is secure that you won't necessarily get hacked, just like it's not because you're car is "secure" that it will not be broken into (or home or whatever).

As an analogy, say that getting into a car to deposit 1 pound of drugs was easy to do and something that happened every day. Add to that those cars would be put on a list easily available to everyone (who could then call to say you have drugs in your car). In such a context, would a law that says if the police finds 1 pound of drug in your car make you instantly guilty regardless of circumstances of drug dealing, facing a 250000$ penalty and years of jail be well-thought? I don't think so.


Kaltes
Premium
join:2002-12-04
Los Angeles, CA

reply to DSL Oberst
said by DSL Oberst See Profile:

Very well, if the users are not to have responsibility, who should be responsible for the security of a user's machine?

How about making the HACKER the one responsible for the wrongdoing. Can't identify/locate the hacker? Tough. Don't punish the innocent party just because you want to punish SOMEONE.

If someone broke into your garage and stole your car, then used it to rob a bank, how would you like being thrown in jail for bank robbery, simply because you didnt go out of your way to constantly update the security on your garage?
Forums » Felony By Proxy


Saturday, 28-Nov 08:57:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [71] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [68] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [52] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· Backstab vs screws (not which to use) [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Nvidia Forceware for Windows XP\2000\03 195.62 [Software]
· How to create ISO with nero 8 [Software]
· Using a 3rd party VDSL modem [AT&T U-verse]
· 'The antivirus industry sucks' [Security]