nozero
Eschew Obfuscation
Premium,MVM,ExMod 2003-06
join:1999-12-29
InnerSanctum
clubs:
 ·Comcast
·Comcast Formerly ..
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·PowWeb
| reply to TWGandalf
Re: Here by popular demand my Trace Route
Okay, this one gets the  . TWGandalf  if you want help, please post again in hopes that you'll get the assistance you're looking for? |
|
info 4 u
@24.217.x.x
| reply to sparky9
"Why did Mr. moderator move my Chartertn.net sucks post?"
not that i looked.. but i would guess it went to the Rant/raves area?
the Mods made the rules pretty clear.. Rants and raves don't belong here and will be moved.. and i can't think of a much more viable rant than... Charter Sucks...... |
|
nozero
Eschew Obfuscation
Premium,MVM,ExMod 2003-06
join:1999-12-29
InnerSanctum
clubs: | reply to Ind33d
I know that's why I would have done it... |
|
Ind33d
@wi.ch
 from:
nozero
| reply to sparky9
said by sparky9 :
Why did Mr. moderator move my Chartertn.net sucks post?
My theory:
»Forum Posting Rules & Guidelines: |
|
sparky9
join:2001-10-31
Kingsport, TN
|  reply to TWGandalf
Why did Mr. moderator move my Chartertn.net sucks post? We have some serious problems here that will only get corrected when enough people complain. All I can tell you TW is that it probably won't get better anytime soon. You can call tech support and they will act like their is no problem or something is wrong with your puter. Its a viscous cycle with these people. |
|
TWGandalf
join:2003-11-17
Lenoir City, TN
| reply to sparky9
Now here is the latency test I just ran. My my look at those pings! This is this sites own test.
Note: Verizon 640/90 lines will 'fail' the medium bandwidth test due to low upload speed
Test Loss Min
Latency Avg
Latency Max
Latency Pass
Fail
Simple ping loss check
10secs of 40byte packets 2 per second 0% loss 239ms 252ms 266ms
pass
low bandwidth stream
10secs of 56k/bit ping stream 512byte packets 0% loss 255ms 289ms 327ms
pass
medium bandwidth stream
10secs of 128k/bit ping stream 512byte packets 13% loss 288ms 1203ms 1705ms
fail
your first hop ping
stream of 40byte pings to 24.158.109.171 0% loss 267ms Could not estimate first hop speed
pass
ping plot from 'ec'
ping plot from 'wc'
From East Coast - uunet - USA to YOU
Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst
0 gi-3-8.a02.nycmny03.us.ra.verio.net 0% 60 60 0.61 9.84 301.05
1 ge-0-0-0.a05.nycmny03.us.ra.verio.net 0% 60 60 0.65 0.87 1.19
2 p16-3-0-0.a04.nycmny01.us.ra.verio.net 0% 60 60 0.74 1.00 1.74
3 xe-0-2-0-4.r20.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net 2% 59 60 0.80 1.02 1.54
4 p16-6-0-0.r00.nwrknj01.us.bb.verio.net 0% 60 60 1.16 1.42 4.45
5 verio-gw.n54ny.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 1.27 1.54 2.12
6 tbr2-p012202.n54ny.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 2.12 2.59 4.26
7 tbr2-cl1.wswdc.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 6.42 7.02 9.21
8 tbr1-cl1.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 19.63 20.16 22.46
9 gbr2-p10.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 19.77 20.04 20.82
10 gar1-p370.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 18.89 19.16 19.63
11 12.124.59.114 0% 60 60 224.43 266.71 293.01
12 gw-swc2kngtn.chartertn.net 0% 60 60 222.54 267.73 292.37
13 gw-cr1kngtn.chartertn.net 2% 59 60 222.06 268.21 290.88
14 gw-ts2alctn.chartertn.net 2% 59 60 243.63 290.67 313.15
15 68.184.173.200 2% 59 60 253.68 303.06 356.34
Pass:
From West Coast - exodus - USA to YOU
Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst
0 unknown.Level3.net 9% 55 60 0.86 1.08 9.88
1 so-6-0-0.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net 2% 59 60 1.25 1.31 1.69
2 level3-gw.st6wa.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 2.25 2.35 2.92
3 tbr2-p012201.sffca.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 3.28 3.69 5.58
4 tbr1-cl3.la2ca.ip.att.net 2% 59 60 10.22 10.59 12.15
5 tbr1-p012101.n54ny.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 39.22 39.94 53.27
6 tbr2-cl1.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 73.97 74.61 88.44
7 gbr2-p20.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 73.23 76.03 223.16
8 gar1-p370.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 73.33 79.18 417.05
9 12.124.59.114 0% 60 60 231.25 271.10 329.12
10 gw-swc2kngtn.chartertn.net 2% 59 60 231.56 288.12 1028.82
11 gw-cr1kngtn.chartertn.net 2% 59 60 234.21 286.22 964.40
12 gw-ts2alctn.chartertn.net 2% 59 60 260.66 311.39 899.95
13 68.184.173.200 2% 59 60 271.13 316.86 835.50
Fail:
|
|
sparky9
join:2001-10-31
Kingsport, TN |  reply to TWGandalf
I think its time to put them in the horror story online review section now. |
|
TWGandalf
join:2003-11-17
Lenoir City, TN
| reply to TWGandalf
Oh, and here is upload download speed
TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.0f
click START to begin
Server Busy: Please wait 60 seconds for previous test to finish
click START to re-test
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 31.77Kb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.19Mb/s
Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem
This makes it look like my download is screaming along. I'm sorry but I don't see it. Very confusing. See I'm being honest here showing results. |
|
TWGandalf
join:2003-11-17
Lenoir City, TN
| This is my trace route to my gaming server located in St. Louis. I pay $37.50 for this gaming server a month so I can play MOHAA online. During the day when hardly no one else is on to play it is always fine. But the past few months this has been happening every night when peeps are on to play against. You go play Medal of Honor Allied Assault and stay alive with a ping like that and about 50 - 80% packet lose. Look at the date and time. This one is fresh off the presses. I still don't know how to do that signal strength thing. Little help please?
Target Name: Cisco2.VSK.GS-145
IP: 66.165.90.145
Date/Time: 11/18/2003 7:46:32 PM
1 9 ms [10.169.128.1]
2 9 ms [10.169.128.1]
3 31 ms gw-cr1kngtn.chartertn.net [24.158.109.161]
4 31 ms gw-swc2kngtn.chartertn.net [24.158.96.177]
5 31 ms gw-er1kngtn.chartertn.net [24.158.96.228]
6 282 ms [12.124.59.113]
7 283 ms gbr1-p70.attga.ip.att.net [12.123.21.2]
8 284 ms tbr1-p013502.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.12.13]
9 298 ms tbr2-cl1.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.69]
10 298 ms tbr1-p013601.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.9.149]
11 316 ms tbr1-cl4.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.30]
12 314 ms gbr5-p100.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.11.106]
13 316 ms ar6-p310.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.123.24.121]
14 316 ms att.cybercon.com [12.125.64.6]
15 330 ms gig408.sw2.cybercon.com [216.15.195.53]
16 316 ms Cisco2.VSK.GS-145 [66.165.90.145] |
|
