republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Brand X Battle » dont want regulation, DO want cooperation
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Cable's own fault.... »
« Shortsighted  

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: dont want regulation, DO want cooperation

said by inteller:
I think if the FCC used regulation as a threat to push more openness that would be the best scenario.
...and I'm all for Motherhood, apple pie, and good sidewalks too. The problem is, the FCC hasn't really pushed openness in ANY network since Reed Hundt was forced out as Chairman (by President Clinton, who replaced him with Kennard--a near ultimate "don't rock any boats" guy.)

The FCC seems to use regulation now only to squelch competition against the established monopolies. Since they have embraced the "two competitors is good enough" approach (telco and cable) it's doubtful that this FCC would ever have expanded cellular competition beyond two players.

Remember how the cellular duopolies of the '80's and '90's kept prices high before PCS blew the cartel open? Yep, that sort of duopoly is the likely result of this FCC's approach to competition.

Calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
hoyleysox

join:2003-11-07
Long Beach, CA

Re: dont want regulation, DO want cooperation

Do you think DirecTV should have to share their network?

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: dont want regulation, DO want cooperation

I think the underlying spectrum should be shared.

If Direct TV had built its network by having a government subsidized monopoly for 90 years, had largely depreciated its network to where it's capital cost for ongoing operations was about zero, was in a position to strong-arm its vendors into supporting its legislative and regulatory agendas, AND HAD AGREED TO SHARE ITS NETWORK IN RETURN FOR BEING ALLOWED INTO LONG DISTANCE AS PART OF TA'96, then, yes, I would support having them share their network.

Since they built a network without a guaranteed rate-of-return (and actually fought monopolies, rather than being one) I think they are in a different position.

Calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
Forums » Brand X BattleCable's own fault.... »
« Shortsighted  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 22:13:17 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [129] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [67] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [56] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [48] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [41] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [40] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [35] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [34] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [24] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
Most people now reading
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Ooma changing features [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· [Internet] Gaming problem for "Heroes of Newerth" ( New bell Upd [Bell Canada]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Phish] email from CDC "personal vaccination profile" [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]