Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco » [Info] Why is PPP necessary for "dedicated connection"?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[Config] 1700 to 1700 routing - HELP »
« [Config] Richard  
AuthorAll Replies

aryoba
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22

reply to rolande
With both PPP and static routing

said by rolande See Profile:
They use static routing to the physical interface. The only way you could reuse user A's configuration is if you were physically connected to the same circuit. The ISP controls what traffic routes to where by the routes they add to their network. As a customer, you do not have control of these routes just by adding another user's configuration to your own network.

In a dynamic config scenario, the user authenticates either via PPP or PPPoE or something similar and all of the settings are passed to the client via a control protocol. The ISP's upstream router then dynamically inserts the new route into its routing tables and announces it to the rest of the ISP network using the local routing protocol. In that case, if you knew user A's username and password you could potentially steal their configuration and reuse it on another physical circuit and interface, since it is dynamically configured as a part of authentication.

Some ISPs give out PPP settings to all their static IP customers. Does it mean the ISP router use static routing to physical interface AND authentication?


rolande
Certifiable
Premium,Mod
join:2002-05-24
Powell, OH
clubs:

Host:
Linksys
AT&T Midwest
reply to aryoba
Re: "Hard coded"

They use static routing to the physical interface. The only way you could reuse user A's configuration is if you were physically connected to the same circuit. The ISP controls what traffic routes to where by the routes they add to their network. As a customer, you do not have control of these routes just by adding another user's configuration to your own network.

In a dynamic config scenario, the user authenticates either via PPP or PPPoE or something similar and all of the settings are passed to the client via a control protocol. The ISP's upstream router then dynamically inserts the new route into its routing tables and announces it to the rest of the ISP network using the local routing protocol. In that case, if you knew user A's username and password you could potentially steal their configuration and reuse it on another physical circuit and interface, since it is dynamically configured as a part of authentication.
--
Remember what they say: "There are 10 types of people in the world.. those who understand binary, and those who don't."

aryoba
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22

reply to rolande
said by rolande See Profile:
If there is no authentication occuring then there is no dynamic configuration occuring. All of the user's configuration is hard coded on the ISP's side in this case.

When you said "hard coded"; did it mean that the ISP always check all customer's MAC address before routing their traffic?

Or maybe there is another checking method?


rolande
Certifiable
Premium,Mod
join:2002-05-24
Powell, OH
clubs:

Host:
Linksys
AT&T Midwest
reply to aryoba
Re: Let's say A is down

If there is no authentication occuring then there is no dynamic configuration occuring. All of the user's configuration is hard coded on the ISP's side in this case, so it is impossible for user B to steal user A's configuration. The ISP's router will not route user B's traffic because it is not configured for user A's settings on user B's interface.
--
Remember what they say: "There are 10 types of people in the world.. those who understand binary, and those who don't."
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco[Config] 1700 to 1700 routing - HELP »
« [Config] Richard  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 13:59:56 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [159] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [74] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [60] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [36] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
Most people now reading
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· DK Weapon Upgrade [World of Warcraft]
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Can I haz sum gold plz? [World of Warcraft]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· LFM Overkill [World of Warcraft]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· So I found a gold mine... [World of Warcraft]