Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco » [Config] 1700 to 1700 routing - HELP
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Any VPN Example Configurations? »
« [Info] Why is PPP necessary for "dedicated connection"?  
AuthorAll Replies


techwench
I Work For Food
Premium
join:2003-06-26
Sherman, TX

reply to dpocoroba
Re: [Config] 1700 to 1700 routing - HELP

said by dpocoroba See Profile:
First off seems rather strange that he would have you connect to the PC's with the serial cable and not ethernet . Did he give you requirements you have to follow? Like ex: have to use the T1 and/or ethernet segment? Easiest way would be to use just the ethernet segment. and set up rip or ospf to be your routing protocol.

This might be a good starting point for you
Thanks for the quick reply, dpocoroba See Profile. I don't know why the PCs are connected with serial and not ethernet either. I guess it's because we work a lot with adtrans (which connect via serial) and he did it out of habit.

Are both the t1 and ethernet connections between the two routers necessary? He didn't say specifically that either one should be used. I just didn't know if both were required.

But thanks, I will try that out...it's a lot more than my two days of constant bursting of blood vessels in my head produced. Thanks.


dpocoroba
Premium
join:2000-11-14
224.0.0.5

said by techwench See Profile:

Are both the t1 and ethernet connections between the two routers necessary? He didn't say specifically that either one should be used. I just didn't know if both were required.

No both are not required. Its just easier to set up the ethernet segments. Since all you have to worry about is them being on the same subnet and not shut down The other thing you may have to worry about depending on physicly your Pc's will be connected to the serials. Is the encapsulation of those interfaces by default its HDLC, This may require some tweaking to maybe PPP.

DP
--
"Knowledge is contagious, infect"


techwench
I Work For Food
Premium
join:2003-06-26
Sherman, TX

Ooooookkkkaaaayyyy!

I haven't gotten over to the routers yet, but something just hit me on the head with a loud bang.

I just realized (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) that I cannot have 2 routers on the same class C. My problem before was I was trying to set the IP addresses of both routers to 10.100.1.x/24 and 10.100.1.n/24...not realizing that doing that is going to make the routers gripe. Instead, I have to set one router to 10.100.1.x and the other to 10.100.2.x

Am I on the right track here?
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » CiscoAny VPN Example Configurations? »
« [Info] Why is PPP necessary for "dedicated connection"?  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 06:10:16 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [151] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [56] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [52] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [44] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [35] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [26] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
Most people now reading
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Security Software Updates - 1 Dec 2009 [Security]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech is either down or gone for good... [Filesharing Software]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Blade servers [TekSavvy]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]