  cork1958 Cork
join:2000-02-26 Fruitport, MI | Give 'em hell!!
Give 'em hell RIAA. Spend some more of that money that's NOT going to the bands or anybody else's pocket but to your own corporate greedy little palms. Why don't you try and figure a way to sell the music online, legally then? Duh!! A**wipes!! |
|
  CO_Chris Premium join:2001-08-28 Broomfield, CO
·Comcast
·Earthlink Cable Mo..
·Comcast Digital Vo..
| I have to agree with cork stop going after people and give more money to the bands and lower the price per song to Hmm maybe 59 cents and then i will stop my downloads for sure and buy the songs i only like. But Till then i will keep doing what i am -- Super Bowl Bound The Houston TEXANS. Well we will have the Super Bowl here this year Anyway |
|
  Oleg Bellsouth Fastaccess Premium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL
| said by CO_Chris : I have to agree with cork stop going after people and give more money to the bands and lower the price per song to Hmm maybe 59 cents and then i will stop my downloads for sure and buy the songs i only like. But Till then i will keep doing what i am
I agree they need to lower prices on cds. I have no problems buying cds, because I am buying tham form BMG music service, but they only have americans cds  |
|
  Lumberjack Premium join:2003-01-18 Newport News, VA
| So lets all just STEAL for now, that's OK. It's perfectly just to bust into my neighbors house and take his flat screen TV because they are too EXPENSIVE for me. Oh wait, that's stealing from somebody else and not right.
Fine then, I'll go to the DEALERSHIP to steal my new car because it's so EXPENSIVE and the guy that designed it doesn't get anything. So if I steal from the dealership, that will eventually causes prices to drop. Wow, I feel so morally correct! -- BBr| UT2003 Clan |
|
 Cyron
join:2002-09-24 Charlotte, NC 1 edit | Actually, I went over to my neighbors house and made a perfect replica of his flat panel TV. He didn't seem to mind, but boy was Sony pissed.
Go steal a clue. |
|
  Lumberjack Premium join:2003-01-18 Newport News, VA
| I forgot it makes it ok to 'copy' things. Hmm, let me go see if the Secret Service will mind if I copy a few $100 bills.
I don't support the RIAAs stupid efforts to sue the world, but if law dictates that copying copyrighted material is illegal and one gets busted for doing just that then I really don't see the problem with them getting sued for financial loss by the company they stole from. Do you?
If you really want to get them where it hurts, stop stealing and only support the bands. Buy records from self produced albums, go to concerts, DON'T BUY it if you think it's expensive. But why steal? Because you can copy byte for byte makes it fine? That's sad. If the band wanted to give it away then they would publish it themselves. Some do, in fact, a lot do. Why all pissy at the RIAA? Why not be pissed at the bands that use them to sell their material?
I suppose people will always find excuses to rationalize their so called 'just' activities. -- BBr| UT2003 Clan |
|
 Cyron
join:2002-09-24 Charlotte, NC | I never said copyright infringement was legal, or morally right. Sharing music with people you don't know is not the same as stealing a TV from your neighbors house. |
|
  Lumberjack Premium join:2003-01-18 Newport News, VA
| Sharing music isn't all that bad either. It's the folks who download it for their own without ever buying anything that's the real problem. That probably does more to raise priceses.
My biggest complaint is the morons that use the "the RIAA isn't paying the artist anything so we should be able to take it anyway". It's kinda like a sad ass robbin hood. Steal from the rich, to keep for ourselves. So what, one day the lables may lower their prices and give more to the bands and all the 'stealing' will stop, yeah right. -- BBr| UT2003 Clan |
|
 beers90125
join:2003-07-24 Kankakee, IL | reply to Lumberjack It's a consumer revolution and it's a clear call to the recording industry to reform their decades old business model that is no longer viable in this day and age. |
|
 scottgibson2 Premium join:2000-07-21 Port Charlotte, FL
| reply to CO_Chris Why 59 cents. I think that a quarter is fair since the average jukebox is only a quarter per song and you have to pay that every time you play it. And out of that quarter the owner of the box makes a cut plus they have to pay ASCAP and others their fees. The amounts that RIAA wants to charge merely demonstrates the greed factor they operate under. It is a shame the bands and musicians they represent haven't woke up and smelled the coffee yet.
Guess I'll keep recording my stuff off the radio and doing my copy thing that way. |
|
  Lumberjack Premium join:2003-01-18 Newport News, VA
| said by scottgibson2 : It is a shame the bands and musicians they represent haven't woke up and smelled the coffee yet.
Exactly! -- BBr| UT2003 Clan |
|