| reply to BlueC
Re: Official Speed Tests Thread My new hosting building in Fairfax, VA.
** Starting test 1 of 1 **
Connected to: ndt.anl.gov -- Using IPv4 address
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 9050.19Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 9027.23Mb/s
The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Gbps 10 Gigabit Ethernet/OC-192 subnet |
|
BlueC
join:2009-11-26
Minneapolis, MN Reviews:
 ·Integra Telecom
 ·voip.ms
 ·T-Mobile US
| reply to BlueC
Took me a bit longer than a few weeks....
** Starting test 1 of 1 **
Connected to: ndt.anl.gov -- Using IPv4 address
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 840.03Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 927.25Mb/s
The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Gbps 10 Gigabit Ethernet/OC-192 subnet |
|
|
|
BlueC
join:2009-11-26
Minneapolis, MN | reply to iansltx
Give me a couple weeks.  |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
 ·Comcast
| reply to redxii
Re: Official Speed Tests Thread I think I have everyone beat...
Gigabit Ethernet to the computer FTW! |
|
BlueC
join:2009-11-26
Minneapolis, MN | reply to Solja_Bear
Yea... the first few pages are over 4 years old. Not exactly apples to apples.... |
|
| reply to redxii
After seeing some of these results on these first few pages I just had to post this. And I do not have fiber. Just the service that comes from their double play package (TV/Internet). |
|
3 edits | reply to redxii
»www.speedtest.net/result/899966506.png
15/15 service, 57 bucks a month. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
·Time Warner Cable
| reply to redxii
Time Warner Cable Fiber -- Dallas, TX I'm the IS Manager and I had a 10/10 Fiber service here put in here at work in South Dallas by TWC. It was installed about 6 or so months ago and haven't had any issues at all! Always available, always fast and never had any outages! -- LOVE IT!
This speed test was conducted about 7:10a (CST) with everyone here @ work running it from the Dallas, TX Speakeasy Server. |
|
 BelinrahsI have an ego the size of a small planetPremium
join:2007-09-07
Nashville, MI
·FreedomNet Wirel..
·Millenicom
| reply to davidhoffman
Re: Official Speed Tests Thread No cable companies around here, only AT&T and a few WISPs. This is a fiber connection that I understand shares capacity with another nearby school. I'll see if I can learn more about why it's that low - still, it's the best upload speed around here considering that the fastest HSI offering here is AT&T's "Elite" ADSL.
--
Sprint MBB thru Millenicom Unlimited service - Novatel Ovation U760 (with coffee-can antenna, thanks Jim_in_VA) connected to a CTR-350. |
|
| reply to Belinrahs
Why the lousy upload speed? I would expect at least 35Mbps upload from a real fiber connection. Those speeds look like hybrid fiber-coax from a cable company. |
|
BelinrahsI have an ego the size of a small planetPremium
join:2007-09-07
Nashville, MI Reviews:
·FreedomNet Wirel..
·Millenicom
2 edits | reply to redxii
wow! |
--
Sprint MBB thru Millenicom Unlimited service - Novatel Ovation U760 (with coffee-can antenna, thanks Jim_in_VA) connected to a CTR-350. |
|
BlueC
join:2009-11-26
Minneapolis, MN Reviews:
·Integra Telecom
·voip.ms
·T-Mobile US
| reply to redxii
FTTB (hi-rise), Cat5e from Dmarc to each unit. 40mbps (dedicated) fiber circuit shared between 80-90 subscribers, being increased to 60mbps soon. All Cisco equipment (router, switches). |
|
| reply to redxii
 |
|
| reply to RobinM
XO Communications in NYC:
»mcs.focusvision.com/myspeed/db/r···id=55486 |
|
 RobinMPremium
join:2001-10-24
Lupton City, TN
1 edit | reply to redxii
Download Speed: 30192 kbps (3774 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 10462 kbps (1307.8 KB/sec transfer rate)
Used Speakeasy.net from Atlanta, GA.
However my ping was 102 :-( |
|
| reply to redxii
»174.34.146.20/myspeed/db/report?id=46650 |
|
MXS
join:2009-10-28
Baltimore, MD | reply to MXS
OC192 |
|
MXS
join:2009-10-28
Baltimore, MD | reply to redxii
|
|
Reviews:
·LUS Fiber
| reply to cooldude9919
said by cooldude9919:said by scoopy03:you should be getting more than 8,000 on 10 megabit connection. but for comparsion this is more symmetrical TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.5.4b click START to begin ** Starting test 1 of 1 ** Connected to: web100.rit.edu -- Using IPv4 address Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 22.62Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 25.79Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 45 Mbps T3/DS3 subnet click START to re-test He choose speed test servers in CA and NY, when he is in LA. Routing may not be ideal between LA and those speed test servers. Choose a speed test in dallas or atlanta or somewhere else closer and it would show better numbers. I ran the speed test from Dallas before, but I haven't posted it yet on here. Additionally, all LUS Fiber customers have 100Mb/s peer-to-peer intranet access.
There is also a local intranet speed test for testing performance within the network, which gave me a big surprise. Intially, I tested my in-network speed with the computer hooked up to my OpenWRT Linksys WRT54G router via the wired interface and received 32Mb/s down and 36Mb/s upload. After bypassing the router and connecting directly to my computer, the speed was 92Mb/s down and 96Mb/s upload. Up until now, the throughput of my router has been a non-issue, but now with the increased bandwidth, it presents a major bottleneck to sharing large files between my in-network friends. |
|
