site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
AuthorAll Replies


nmop$

join:2001-05-05

reply to Zhen-Xjell

ASP review

I've been using AdSubtract Pro for about 4 months and their free version AdSubtract SE for a month before that. And lemme say this: their adblocking is fantastic! Any site that get's ads from a different source other than the main site get's edited out. There is not even an outline of the spot where the ad used to be and sites look extremely clean! I kept it while I had 56K because sites loaded much much faster. After getting RR i keep it, because, well it's nice to see the web without tasteless campaigns to get ur attnetion. The stats function is fantastic.

My second objective was to find a popup stopper and I tried several free ones but I didn't like the fact that javascript was completely disabled when using them. I upgraded to ASP and I'm not sure exactly how ASP stops popups but it works damn well. Hoever for some sites with javascript, i have to quit ASP and refresh the site to view the content. It's a mild annoyance but worth it, for the 90% of the time when it's not necessary.

I tried some porn and warez sites (only to test, really =) ) and I never got a single popup. Not all the porn ads were removed but that's because they must have been stored on the site. ASP captures all incoming ads not directly stored on the site. As this is the majority of how ads are posted, it's extremely effective and much more so than any other ad removing product like Adsoff and etc.

I cannot reccomend ASP enough assuming you have the 15MB of memory or so that it uses while running. I really feel pretty naked surfing without it. lol

I have also used webwasher before and have not been pleased with it. It's inferior to ASP. I have tried Proxomitron and have found it to be too customizable. Maybe it was an old version but there were too many options to configure and the interface was confusing. I haven't used Naviscope as I heard it might be tracking your internet usage. I'm not sure how reliable that rumor is but I haven't needed any other program other than ASP.
[text was edited by author 2001-05-27 22:22:43]


Zhen-Xjell
Prolific Bunny
Premium,VIP,ExMod 2001-04
join:2000-10-08
Bordentown, NJ

said by nmopepisdn:
I haven't used Naviscope as I heard it might be tracking your internet usage. I'm not sure how reliable that rumor is but I haven't needed any other program other than ASP.
Thanks for your assessment of the applications. One thing, this post by Alex is very long, and goes into minute detail about this very issue. It proves Naviscope is not "spyware". Please read it, it dispels the rumors.


Jeffrey, thanks for your comments. About WW, please re-read the first post. The third paragraph mentions WebWasher and leads the reader to a thread that contains a more detailed editorial.

Warm Regards.

--
»All your Smurf are belong to Smurf!
»Ad/Cookie Blocking App Reviews

[text was edited by author 2001-05-27 22:46:26]


ethics$
Premium
join:2000-12-27
Brooklyn, NY

reply to nmop$
Excellent review, nmopepisdn, precisely what I was looking for.

I concur that AS LOOKED superior to others but lacked web bugs filtering. I've written the creators asking them this specific question but to this day no one responded so I assume they do not block it.
--
Folding can save a life!



amark

join:2001-02-09
94045

reply to nmop$
I used Adsoff(Intercantech) for a while and liked that allot. Doesn't work with new version of Zone Alarm Pro 2.6. Went to AddSubtract. Worked great,does block everything. I am not familiar with using Proxy's. I do not know how safe it is. I found @guard's 2.2 version and went to that. It block most of the ads and pop ups, but I noticed one thing. The speed of pages downloading is noticebly faster with @guard and from what I remember, with Adsoff. I think I will sacrifice getting rid of 90% of the ads for speed and comfort of not having to go through a Proxy(unless someone could explain the security of a proxy).



Zhen-Xjell
Prolific Bunny
Premium,VIP,ExMod 2001-04
join:2000-10-08
Bordentown, NJ

Thanks amark for the information. Now just a quick side note... I received some emails just now from WebWasher support. I posted parts of it here. In addition, the linked post contains a tidbit on how to catch those cookies that slip past WW.
--
»All your Smurf are belong to Smurf!
»Ad/Cookie Blocking App Reviews



R2
R Not
Premium,MVM
join:2000-09-18
Long Beach, CA
kudos:1

Perhaps this is out of place, but could you elaborate slightly on:

said by Z-X:
The hosts file... just does not do it for me in the MS OS world.
What exactly is your issue?
[text was edited by author 2001-05-28 10:10:31]


Zhen-Xjell
Prolific Bunny
Premium,VIP,ExMod 2001-04
join:2000-10-08
Bordentown, NJ

From my perspective, a simple feel of the system I am using. How do my senses (broad definition here... sight, ease of navigation, etc) react to the OS environment?

I love to work in the console whenever I am on a *nix system. To me, it would be horrible not to use the command line. There exists a certain art-form with exhilaration in using the command line in ksh.

MS does not give me the same sensory perception for its command line. To me, MS is at its best with the GUI... that is where my senses get their pleasure.

Hence, I rather stay away from any text editing in a Windows environment, whereas I love text editing in a UNIX environment. Subjective I know, but that is what works for me.
--
»All your Smurf are belong to Smurf!
»Ad/Cookie Blocking App Reviews



nmop$

join:2001-05-05

reply to amark
amark, someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe having a proxy like ASP or Adsoff doesn't increase security one bit. And how does @guard block the ads if not through a proxy? I'm not aware of any other method...
[text was edited by author 2001-05-28 13:28:10]



gwion
wild colonial boy
Premium,ExMod 2001-08
join:2000-12-28
Pittsburgh, PA
kudos:1

A proxy can drop connections to certain IP's, but it does it at the app level, and provides security only from known threats, if you include them as filters, by simply blocking access to them. For example, if you know that site x.x.x.x is running hostile java code, you could put a rule to block that IP in the proxy, and it would... hopefully. It can't filter with the effectiveness of a firewall, and is not a substitute for one. With a good firewall, security is one of the last reasons to use a proxy server; in fact, as I noted in a recent question posted here, a proxy can be a natural tunnel through any firewall if it's not configured right, so it can actually be a risk, in some instances. Look at it this way: the app contacts the firewall directly, where it is checked to see if this is an allowed app using an allowed port, then passed or denied based on what can be very specific rules. With a proxy, the app contacts the proxy, which contacts the firewall AS ITSELF, so all the firewall sees accessing it is "proxyserver.exe on port xx"; the rules it applies are the rules for proxyserver.exe, not for the app... the firewall, at this point, neither knows nor cares what app is contacting it, it assumes the request is from the proxy and applies the rules you've set for the proxy, not the underlying app. The only "rules" applied to a proxied connection, once you allow outbound connections from it at the firewall, are the filters in the proxy itself. If the proxy can't filter as well as the firewall (and it can't), then any number of things can "ride through the tunnel" and evade detection on the firewall, unless you perform some ("real") acrobatics to check the localhost traffic to the proxy server (can be done with Tiny, don't know about ZA).

Used as a second layer of filters only for apps that access http connections (for example, only IE ad OE), a good proxy can compliment a good firewall immensely, in terms of ad management, cookie screening, and so forth. Used willy-nilly as a default pass through for every app accessing the internet, though, it has the potential of becomming a "tunnel" instead of a "gate" to let a rogue app or trojan that would otherwise be caught at the firewall undermine its way through the proxy tunnel to the internet.

Proxies can also, sometimes, be accessed offsite (from the internet), where there is no firewall or a big enough hole in the firewall to let a cracker in. In other words, if you have a misconfigured proxy server, I MIGHT be able to connect to it from here, if I were of that devious a mind, and make my connections appear to be coming from your IP, without the muss or fuss of having to spoof anything. This is a bit rare, and somewhat specific to certain servers, especially some caching proxy servers, but a real possibility, nonetheless, and not at all that unusual or a bit difficult for the cracker, once he finds you, really.
--
Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times he will pick himself up and carry on. - Sir Winston Churchill



amark

join:2001-02-09
94045

I wasn't saying a proxy was secure. I was trying to say I do not feel safe using a proxy.I thought proxy's weren't safe. Using a program like atguard or adsoff was safer.



Zhen-Xjell
Prolific Bunny
Premium,VIP,ExMod 2001-04
join:2000-10-08
Bordentown, NJ

I have not used programs like Checkpoint which are industrial strength applications, but I do know that such high grade quality applications are software proxies.


Monday, 04-Jun 15:24:02 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics