 drakeOverdosed on confidencePremium,MVM
join:2002-06-10
Brooklyn, NY
kudos:5 | Larger Avatars justin  if it's not to much but can you make our limit for avatars at 50 x 50 pixels? 40 x 40 is too small....Thanks! |
|
| or how about 40*50 for custom tags, 50x50 sounds to big
**Object** To 50x50
**sign** to 40x50 |
|
 tehGekke KraaiPremium
join:2003-03-21
Malaysia | reply to drake
If justin wants it to be square then I agree for 50x50. I don't mind even if it is 40x50 as long as I get 10 in height back.
* Sign *
--
祝你愉快的新年 |
|
 usa2kBlessedPremium,MVM
join:2003-01-26
Redford, MI
kudos:3 | reply to drake
50x50 *sign* |
|
 Action_ManCurrently Appearing AsPremium
join:2003-07-22
England | reply to drake
Perhaps someone can explain whats actually wrong with the 50x50 avatars , so as to bring an end to this controversy and uprising , its gathering some pace at the moment and someone should step in to halt its progress one way or the other ...
Personally i think the 40x40 option is a little restrictive on the skills of the graphic`s artist and takes a lot of the fun out of it , which is in fact why they/we do it ...
--
»www.actionman.org |
|
 removedPremium,VIP
join:2002-02-08
Houston, TX
kudos:37 | reply to drake
No, 50x50 avatars suck. *object* |
|
drakeOverdosed on confidencePremium,MVM
join:2002-06-10
Brooklyn, NY
kudos:5
1 edit | said by removed:
No, 50x50 avatars suck. *object*
Everything sucks to you...Digital Cable, etc...:p |
|
removedPremium,VIP
join:2002-02-08
Houston, TX
kudos:37 | I disagree. |
|
 MacySouth Of InsanityPremium,MVM,ExMod 2004-7
join:2001-12-02
Pink Beanbag
kudos:1 | reply to drake
*Sign*
50 x 50 is not that much larger and would look incredible. I do like the idea of completely square avatars but 40 x 40 limits what you can use without losing details.
--
Like, Zoinks! What would you do for a Scooby snack? |
|
|
|
 Mask21Premium
join:2003-09-07
Somewhere | reply to drake
* Sign *
40x40 isn't the way to go. |
|
 WeirdalPremium
join:2003-06-28
Grand Island, NE
kudos:20 | reply to drake
*sign* because of what Action_Man said |
|
 fatnesssubtleJanitor
join:2000-11-17
fishing
kudos:14
Bright House Netwo..
TekSavvy
Forum Feature Requ..
Need Site Help
Rants, Raves, and ..
| reply to drake
I doubt avatars will ever be 50 pixels wide; 40 is plenty.
As to increasing the height, they're shorter now to make room for all the user-defined customizations available now and discussed in this thread: »I quite like this one
Those customizations were a result of many feature requests here. Is your suggestion to take all of them away to make more room for avatars? If so, I *object*. I can see a 40x40 avatar just fine, and think it is less important than other information in the box to the left of the post screen.
--
Oh man, I've ruined everything. I know. I'll go on tour with the Dead. They'll accept me. They’ll have to die sometime though. What then? I know. I'll be a Janitor. |
|
 zeoneMePremium
join:2003-04-24
Msia | reply to drake
Yup...me support 50x50.
Give creative ppl room 2create...:)
*SIGN*
--
Every day is a New Beginning... |
|
 ccallanaHuh?Premium,VIP
join:2000-08-03
Folsom, CA
1 edit | reply to drake
*object* - be more creative and find a way to make 40x40 work. consider it a challenge 
edit- after reading all this - I change my vote to *don't care*
 |
|
Action_ManCurrently Appearing AsPremium
join:2003-07-22
England | reply to drake
Would you take a 20% pay-cut and try to make ends meet ? ...
--
»www.actionman.org |
|
| reply to drake
sign
Totally Agree! 
--
To Be Or Not To Be... That's The Answer. |
|
 SarahPremium,ExMod 2002-05
join:2001-01-09
Cambridge, MA
kudos:5
 ·MegaNet Communic..
| reply to fatness
said by fatness:
Is your suggestion to take all of them away to make more room for avatars? If so, I *object*.
I'm having a hard time seeing where anyone has suggested that, fatness .
The difference in terms of space taken up on the page is actually quite small, but I do believe it would increase legibility in a lot of avatars. Keeping the limit to 5k would make sure the pages don't load slower.
I attached a 40-pixel square and a 50-pixel square to show everyone what the sizes look like in comparison to each other.
I *sign* to 50x50.
--
Got an idle CPU? Check out Team Helix! |
|
 ZupePremium,MVM
join:2001-11-29
New York, NY | reply to drake
*Sign* to either returning it to 40x50 or going to 50x50 if it needs to be square. |
|
| reply to drake
I sign to 50x50, plus it would be nice to have a few more k to play around with in animations.
--
Lets talk weather |
|
| reply to drake
I want 1600x1200 |
|
