 CO_Chris Premium join:2001-08-28 Broomfield, CO | Re: Spbot is fine for me. I Use Ad-aware and it works great . If there is better i would try it to | |
|
 Doubledee32
join:2002-06-20 Charlotte, NC | Re: Spbot is fine for me. SpySweeper works great!! | |
|
 Cod
join:2000-07-05 Greensboro, NC | Not to make this a spybot vs. ad-aware dispute, spybot finds a heck of alot more spyware on a PC the the latter. Plus its ability to download updates to detect new spyware makes it incredibly accurate. | |
|
 |  tdkyo
join:2002-12-07 Rochester, NY | Re: Spbot is fine for me. Heck, both of them do a good job. What I do is run ad-aware first then spybot to double check. | |
|
 |  |   Piobaireachd Happy Halloween Premium join:2000-09-21 Port Orchard, WA
| Re: Spbot is fine for me. said by tdkyo : Heck, both of them do a good job. What I do is run ad-aware first then spybot to double check.
I run them both as well. -- "Re-elect Bush/Cheney, November 2004." - obodhisattva | |
|
 |  |   cork1958 Cork
join:2000-02-26 Fruitport, MI | Ditto for me. Plus Spywareblaster for preventive measures. | |
|
 |   Unregistered user
@cofs.net | Actually, Ad-Aware can now download updates as well.
I do have to agree, though. Spybot seems to catch more spyware, although I run both, just to be sure. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  jsouth Jsouth
join:2000-12-12 Wichita, KS
| Re: Spbot is fine for me. I think it was Maximum PC that said that Spybot removed a few more "spyware" apps than adaware. Notice a said a few and not "a heck of a lot more" like the previous poster. I believe this is due to spybot having more updates put out than adaware. That said I use both. | |
|
 |  fixrman
join:2003-02-10 Hatboro, PA | AdAware is updateable as well. | |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |