
how-to block ads
|
 Bobby_Peru Premium join:2003-06-16
4 edits | Ads BGone - Ad Free Surfing FireBird/AdBlock -
 AdBlock -Add Filter |  AdBlock -Blockable Items List |  AdBlock y |  AdBlock -Add Flash |  AdBlock Preferences |  AdBlock - Options |
Ads BGone - Ad Free Surfing: FireBird/AdBlock - Some early general impressions.
Since the introduction of the proxy WebWasher Classic (free for home/school use), it has been quite a few years since regaining control over surfing content, with an estimated 99.9+% block rate over unwanted PopCrap, and the downloading and display of very very few ads of any kind.
For PopCrap, NetScape 7.1's (free) site specific filter is very effective, as is FireBird's (free), and they have actually taken over this particular scrud filtering duty from WebWasher Classic (WWC).
The undesirable content that very rarely makes it through is used to add to WWC's Filters (the url of the source is added to the "URL Filter", and/or the Dimensions are added to the "Dimension Filter".
For these many years surfing enjoyed at least three improvements:
1) Unwanted, distracting, annoying, ads were not suffered.
2) Speed was noticeably increased (more so on dialups), as Megs and Megs of ad spewage was not downloaded.
3) Security and Privacy were improved (filtering of scripts, and of tracking methods such as WebBugs, Referrers, Cookies, Prefixes)
Of course Proxomitron is a vastly more powerful tool, and is html 1.1 compliant, though it's "complexity" has so far daunted many (myself included) from further exploration, and recommendation to most "average" users.
The problem with WWC is that it has not been updated in quite some time, and so, as hpguru has pointed out, it apparently still is not html 1.1 compliant. This would account for recent noticeable slowing of some site's page loads when WWC is utilized, even though it is preventing the downloading of many unwanted images.
The advent of FireBird's built in Filtering, when combined with FireBird's plethora of amazing small programs that each user can choose to add, or not, called Extensions, - or Extension Room- (and from within FireBird Tools--> Options ---> Extensions --> Get Extensions) increases the configurability and control in these areas.
___________________________________________
Built in to FB- Java: Tools---> Options--> Web Features ---> Java Advanced; Cookies: Tools---> Options ---> Privacy ---> Cookies PopCrap: Tools ---> Options --->Web Features ---> Block Popup Windows..... Block Images: Right Click Context Menu; Tools ---> Options ---> Web Features
One Extension- TabBrowser Extensions (TBE) Tools ---> Tab --->TBE Preferences ---> Advanced ---> New Windows Opened By JavaScript __________________________________________________
The down side is the increase in possible conflicts that this brings, and the time it takes to get it all "just right".
AdBLOCK TO THE RESCUE -
The recent rapid development, evolution, and maturation of AdBlock (or Extension Room, or Texturizer) as represented by the current version ( Adblock 0.5 d2 nightly 35 -NOTE: Clicking here within FireBird (or Mozilla) may cause a prompt for download and install) shows great improvement, and heralds the possibility of the elimination of the need for an external proxy application (like WWC or Proxomitron) to still achieve the same scrud-free surfing goals. This should also decrease possible conflicts and the need to troubleshoot them, and simultaneously make fine tuning much easier, through the increased use of configuration options available directly within the Browser (both right click Context Menu, Drop-down menus, and buttons).
NO LONGER JUST HIDING - Up until v0.4, AdBlock would only "Hide" filtered content. The ads would still be downloaded, just not displayed. While this solved #1 above by saving the user's eyes and brain from having to actually wade through the scrud, it did nothing to eliminate the decrease in speed (#2) , and in security and privacy (#3) that comes with downloading the scrud. The Extension BannerBlind, which "filters" based on dimensions, apparently still only "Hides" (future versions are planned to include actual download prevention). With the advent of download preventative filtering, AdBlock has finally matured into a tool that increases Speed, Privacy and Security (though tracking methods such as WebBugs, Referrers and Prefixes will apparently have to be addressed by user added Filters).
HOW TO FILTER- To filter an image, simply right click over it, check the url in the New Filter field in the Add AdBlock filter popup for any wildcard or other helpful modifications, and click OK. (See 1st Screen Shot).
AdBlock's "List All Blockable Elements" (see 2ed Screen Shot) does just that, from which you can select and modify just what you want to add as Filters. It is available by Control-Shift-A, clicking "AdBlock" on the right corner of the Status Bar, or Tools ---> AdBlock ---> List All Blockable Elements. One quickly obvious drawback to this powerful feature, is the inability to select more than one url for listing or modification and listing, without being forced to first exit, and then return to this menu.
You can also enter Filters manually. All filters can be edited.
AdBlock now supports user configurable "scripts" to allow one to 're-write' how a page, or pages are viewed. I have not experiment in this area, and do not know it's limitations, or how it compares to the mighty Proxomitron, in this regard, but it sure looks promising!
FLASH CONTROL AdBlock seems to be working quite well with FlashClickToPlay. If you choose to view a flash object by clicking the "ClickToPlay" Button, AdBlock places a small "tab" proximate to it (see Screen Shot #3), enabling quick filter configuration (Screen Shot #4).
AdBlock can Export and Import it's user configured Filters.
What is really promising is that through the use of scripts, and the plans for future implementation of "Bayesian" type filtering, AdBlock looks to be heading towards one very powerful tool!
SOME NEGATIVES On the less desirable side, AdBlock's developer says (AdBlock FAQ) it will not incorporate Dimensional filtering, since BannerBlock already does. The developer also says it will not deal with animation control for "streamline" and other Mozilla-like mantra type reasons. This only winds up forcing the user to have to deal with closely related filtering configurations in numerous different menus.
There are still bugs in AdBlock itself, as there are in FB, but like FB for surfing, AdBlock has already achieved sufficient stability and maturation of development to be seriously considered as a primary Scrud Busting surfing tool.
WERE TO FIND HELP "The Adblock Project Forum" is available for suggestions, questions and assistance from the developer.
SUMMARY Overall, AdBlock is already very good, and if the past is indicative, will soon be great! | |   EvilByDesire Premium join:2002-09-03 Grotto
·Atlantic Broadband
| that looks like a complete ripoff of ad sheild -- The Ital£ian Himan | |   EvilByDesire Premium join:2002-09-03 Grotto
·Atlantic Broadband
| reply to Bobby_Peru My blocked list with adsheild ( that program u just posted looks like a rip off) -- The Ital£ian Himan | |   Arcadies Premium join:2002-05-14 Greeneville, TN
| reply to Bobby_Peru I like Adblock, been using it for quite a while now, it and google bar are the only extensions I use. I like the fact that it can remove the ads entirely, not just hide it like mozilla/firebird's image blocker, so you can't accidently click it. -- Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. Enter the gates, Charon awaits. | |  jdmatl
join:2000-04-27 Deerfield Beach, FL
| reply to Bobby_Peru I have been using something superior,
»www.admuncher.com
it is worth the $19.95 fee. I was a BIG Prox-a-matron fan, but that is also a proxy based solution.
Admuncher totally rocks! it is NOT a proxy but sits in-between the winsock driver and such. the website can give you the tech details.
This product is rock solid. No problems with XP or win2k. Since Jun 7, 2003 I have managed to save over 265megs of bandwidth and have removed over 30,000 ads with the product. | |   sivran Long Live The Suite Premium join:2003-09-15 Arlington, TX clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Bobby_Peru AdBlock's been around forever. You're just now discovering it? Not that I would use it anyway. If you block ads from ever loading, some (most, or all I suspect that get anything at all for just displaying the ads) websites won't get any money for having them. Would you deny the life blood of a website you like? -- Protected by Win98SE/NAV 2K3+MWAV Free/Router/Gecko/Kerio/Safe Hex | |  Test Man6
join:2003-04-12 USA | reply to Bobby_Peru I am trialing Admuncher after reading some feedback about the program.
I agree with jdmatl. Admuncher is an excellent program!!! Where do I get it for $19.95? I thought it cost $25. | |   mrchris We don't miss you Bush Premium join:2002-10-01 North Babylon, NY 1 edit | reply to Bobby_Peru How do I remove an older version of Adblock before installing the new one?
Cannot find the appropiate files to modify and remove, it cannot find adblock.jar  | |  Bobby_Peru Premium join:2003-06-16
3 edits | reply to Bobby_Peru Hi EvilByDesire , Don't know about about Ad Shield, or whether or not there is IP infringement involved, though I certainly hope not!
Hi Arcadies . Seems to me that it was only once AdBlock was completely revamped to function to prevent the calling and downloading of filtered objects, that it graduated to the 'big leagues'. Prior to that point AdBlock was not all that much different than Image Block in effectiveness.
Hi jdmatl , thanks for the heads-up and link. WebWasher Classic gives stats (Filtered: Images, Windows, Scripts, Layers, Frames...; Images Received; and more). According to it, in approximately 14 months, close to 500,000 images were not called and downloaded on one machine. Sounds a bit over the top, though who knows with WebBugs and such). Can't find any stats in AdBlock, and I don't recall them in Proxomitron.
When you tested AdMuncher against AdBlock and Proxomitron, in what specific parameters was AdMuncher superior to each? Thanks.
Hi sivran , As related in the original post, and above to Arcadies , the AdBlock that was long-in-the tooth, was only a 'display blocker', not much different than Geko's OME, and as such, of no use in returning page load times to pre-ad bloat levels (let alone pre-flash bloat), or from halting 3ed party marketers from gathering and compiling that which some folks would rather not willingly provide to them.
WebWasher Classic's, Proxomitron's, and recently AdBlock's Filter configuration gives the user control over what is downloaded and from were it can can come. You can tailor the filters to suite your particular surfing needs and desires.
All three have simple On/Off toggles. AdBlock can toggle between it's present level of functionality, and it's "been around for ever" primitive past, by just selecting "Hide Ads" (See Screen Shot "AdBlock Preferences"), in which case the scrud you may desire to download will grace your hd, and yet you will not be [ir]radiated with it. hth | |  Bobby_Peru Premium join:2003-06-16
3 edits | reply to mrchris said by mrchris : How do I remove an older version of Adblock before installing the new one?
Cannot find the appropiate files to modify and remove, it cannot find adblock.jar 
Hi mrchris , sorry I missed answering you query late last night.
From the AdBlock FAQ:
How do I deinstall Adblock? For v0.5, just open the prefs, pop the 'options' menu, and choose "DeInstall". That's all.
For v0.4 and prior, remove the file 'chrome.rdf' and its corresponding 'overlays' directory from app::chrome, profile::chrome as well as the xul cache and 'adblock.jar'. . Next, remove all lines with references to 'adblock.jar' from 'installed-chrome.txt' -- located in the same folder as the jar-file. . Lastly, for v0.4, remove all occurrences of 'adblock.xml' from userContent.css, also located in the same folder as the jar-file. ----------------------------hth--------------
Did you try a "Search" for any missing files?
[edit: I may have misread your post:
Is your version so early as to not have "DeInstall" (Tools ---> AdBlock ---> Preferences ---> Options ---DeInstall -See "AdBlock Options" Screen Shot above); or Cntrl-Shft-P), or are you saying that DeInstall is not working?
2) To Search (Win2Kp) Start---> Search --->> Files or Folders ---> Type or paste "adblock.jar" into Field "Search for Files or Folders Named"] | |   Snakeoil Taxes are Armed robbery. Premium join:2000-08-05 Mentor, OH
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to sivran said by sivran : AdBlock's been around forever. You're just now discovering it? Not that I would use it anyway. If you block ads from ever loading, some (most, or all I suspect that get anything at all for just displaying the ads) websites won't get any money for having them. Would you deny the life blood of a website you like?
I have to agree with you. Bandwidth costs money, and busy sights that are free have to sell sometype of service, or use ads.
Heck how long due you think DSLreports would last if Justin didn't sell tool points and no advertising?
I can understand the need of such programs when surfing the "jerk off" rings.... porn banner pages that just seem to loop you around in a never ending bunch of banner pages/pop-up pages/ads and never giving you the "advertised" gallery of free pictures. Even the adult sights that "hijack" IE and go full screen on you. Those are the type of pages that make and encourage the use of such ad blockers/browser control programs. If you don't surf porn, you really don't need an ad blocker, except for something like ZoneAlarm Pro [blocks pop ups] or the google tool bar [also blocks pop ups].
I have no problem viewing "static" ads that just sit on the page. I hate animated flash/java ads [they use system resources][gif animated ads I have little trouble with], and pop up ads. -- For what its worth:Vote for sale. To any Canidate for reasonble amount. Please contact me and will discuss my fee for my vote. Just one vote can make a difference. | |  Bobby_Peru Premium join:2003-06-16
| Hi Snakeoil ,
With configurable filters like WebWasher, Proxo, and others, you control which sites display unfiltered in their full splendor and glory, which are filtered, and how they are filtered. This is stated a few times in the above information. Each user determines for themselves just what "you need". | |   Snakeoil Taxes are Armed robbery. Premium join:2000-08-05 Mentor, OH
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Bobby_Peru : Hi Snakeoil ,
With configurable filters like WebWasher, Proxo, and others, you control which sites display unfiltered in their full splendor and glory, which are filtered, and how they are filtered. This is stated a few times in the above information. Each user determines for themselves just what "you need".
Thks for the heads up. In my limited experience with them, it was an all or nothing set up.
Ill have to try them again. Any of them free to use? or are they paid programs? -- For what its worth:Vote for sale. To any Canidate for reasonble amount. Please contact me and will discuss my fee for my vote. Just one vote can make a difference. | |  Bobby_Peru Premium join:2003-06-16 | They are all free. WebWasher Classic is free for "home and school". | |   Snakeoil Taxes are Armed robbery. Premium join:2000-08-05 Mentor, OH
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Bobby_Peru Do they also control the IE hijackers? The scripts that open a full screen ad, and the only way to close it, is by hitting altctrl-delete and closing it that way?
Thats my biggest beef, is the sights that do that, or try to set up a dailer on your system. -- For what its worth:Vote for sale. To any Canidate for reasonble amount. Please contact me and will discuss my fee for my vote. Just one vote can make a difference. | |  Bobby_Peru Premium join:2003-06-16
| It depends on what exactly is occurring. First thing you might consider doing is to follow Archie Bell and The Drells sage advice and "Tighten Up" IE's settings (see Markus Jansson's page on decreasing the exploitability of IE's known vulnerabilities, and Eric Howes's Internet Explorer Privacy & Security Settings very thorough, yet easy to follow tutorial, which provides numerous screen shots of the procedure.
This is the basis on which to build protection against much IE exploitation.
Also, the freeware applications SpywareBlaster and SpywareGuard offer "immunization", and real time protection, respectively, from many known IE exploits.
Then, add a filter, like WebWasher, or Proxo.
You can find links and more info in the FAQ: »Security »How to Secure (and Keep Secure) My (New) Computer(s): A Layered Approach: | |  Bobby_Peru Premium join:2003-06-16
1 edit | reply to Bobby_Peru FireFox -AdBlock Filter Update -
 AdBlock-able Items Menu |
Running the filters listed in the thread "Sticky: Advanced Filters" in the The Adblock Project Forum for around two weeks now has been a pleasure. Speed is good, and there have not been many instances of either having to add a filter (Right Click "Add..", or Control-Shift A for "AdBlock-able Items Menu" as in Screen Shot above) for a particular site or offending object, or toggle AdBlock off (Control-Shift B) to allow a desired blocked object through (i.e. spell check in DSL is blocked), neither of which are a big deal anyway.
Fast, smooth, easy, improving, free........ | |
|