republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Blocking Port 25 Traffic » Thanks Idiots!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Comcast SMTP not needed here? »
« Other port 25 checks  
AuthorAll Replies


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to ChrisN4BSA
Re: Thanks Idiots!

said by ChrisN4BSA See Profile:
I hate to be punished for clueless users, but if it helps slow down the spread of viruses that spread via email, I'm all for it.
Why not yank access for the idiots who don't bother to secure their machines and/or clean up their systems?
--
Do the world a favor, Saddam. Kill yourself.


dilettante

join:2002-01-01
Haslett, MI

I've often thought that licensing (certifying) users might be a reasonable tactic. Something where you'd agree to random external audits of your network (scans and other penetration tests, monitoring traffic over an interval).

But there are cost and privacy issues I suppose, and it would really cut into the lucrative "granny (grandpaw?) AOL" market of low-use, unsophisticated users.

But I have to wonder... wouldn't it make economic sense to offer high bandwidth to "certified" users and lower bandwidth and blocked ports to those "potential problem users" who are likely to get hijacked - at the same or similar prices? If you keep your network clean and properly isolated and your boxes secure and use adequate throttling mechanisms... [takes a breath] any real hazard from running services is minimal. Violations or complaints and you'd get dropped back to the "wild west" service with ports blocked.

Sort of a "being responsible grants privileges" policy.

But maybe that's precisely where those high-cost commercial offerings come in: you pay for the privilege of being responsible. Everyone else "swims with the fishes" wearing a hardsuit.
Forums » Blocking Port 25 TrafficComcast SMTP not needed here? »
« Other port 25 checks  


Saturday, 05-Dec 01:52:15 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· Sun Releases Update 17 for Java SE 6 [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· I finally jumped off the Windows ship! [All Things Macintosh]