Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » File Trading Anonymity » File sharing too risky?
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Take ES5 OUT! »
« Centralization is bad. Only encryption will do.  
dcnblues

join:2002-09-19
Irving, TX

Re: File sharing too risky?

Newsgroups are great, except for one problem. Not all ISP's carry the 'alt.binary' groups (where all file attachments are supposed to go) AND not all ISP's 'keep' all the messages -- in fact, some deliberately set the expire timeouts low so that if server space is at a premium, a large binary file message will get deleted to make room for several small text messages that are as little as 5 minutes 'newer'.

So newsgroup sharing becomes a 'scavenger hunt' exercise, where you can get MOST of a file youw ant, but have to go hunting for the one message (or four) that will complete the 'collection' and enable you to reassemble your file.

The pay-to-play newsgroup services like Supernews are much better... but their rates are almost as high per month as ISP access (sometimes more, depending on how much data you pull).

But yes, they are reasonably anonymous...keep in mind that posts to USENET go through SMTP (email outbound) so are subject to the same anonymity restrictions (branded with originating IP etc). Most privacy-savvy users can get around this using SMTP proxies and forged headers, but the average Joe probably will not know how to go about doing this.

Cheetah9

join:2001-01-07
Bethel Park, PA

Re: File sharing too risky?

And then you have companies like Covad who get their feeds from Supernews, but then put unrealistically LOW speed caps on your downloads. That really sucks!
--
If everything is under control your not going fast enough!!
DONKEYKONG01

join:2003-03-21
Metairie, LA

Re: File sharing too risky?

Speed cap sucks, I would be very unhappy.

53059959
Temp banned from BBR more then anyone

join:2002-10-02
PwnZone

said by dcnblues See Profile:
Newsgroups are great, except for one problem. Not all ISP's carry the 'alt.binary' groups (where all file attachments are supposed to go)
man, you know how much bandwidth those alt.binaries newsgroups use? meh, I know an isp that uses 98% of it's 100mbps line just from newsgroups. but i'm not complaining =) don't hate; share warez
Forums » File Trading AnonymityTake ES5 OUT! »
« Centralization is bad. Only encryption will do.  


Saturday, 28-Nov 01:35:22 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [66] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [50] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· [Wireless] Linksys WMP54g v4.1 and Windows 7 x64 [Linksys]
· Flu Pandemic ? What Flu Pandemic ? [Canadian Chat]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]