ThaDark1
Don't Blame Me. I Voted For Pedro
Premium
join:2003-09-08
Newton, IA
1 edit | com.com
CNet has owned »www.com.com for a while as well. Guess it's ok though they use it for legitimate reasons. All it does is reroute to »www.cnet.com. |
|
Brisk
Qwest's Spirit Of Service Inaction
join:2003-07-11
Colorado Springs, CO
clubs: | It's creepy is what it is, TLDs for domains should be illegal.
CNet could turn into a revenue monster just as easily as VeriSign. |
|
SuperJudge
Magus
Premium
join:2002-11-14
Albany, GA
clubs: | I wouldn't be surprised if they had that in mind.
--
Updated My Journal |
|
rchandra
Stargate S G-1 And Atlantis Fan
Premium
join:2000-11-09
14225-2105
clubs:
| reply to Brisk
I think you mean TLD names for SLD names  Such alphabet soup.
I don't agree. What if I start up an insurance company and call in Complete Oversight Mitigation for example? Why should I be denied com.com? There are plenty of companies that have three word names, and use their initials as their domain name...such as Network Associates, Inc. (nai.com).
--
English is a difficult enough language to interpret correctly when its rules are followed, let alone when a writer chooses not to follow those rules. Blog is here |
|
