  kfolsom Where the fit hits the shan Premium join:2003-01-31 Yucaipa, CA
·Verizon west (ex G..
| reply to NewLife Re: 2.5/1.3??!
said by NewLife : Hell yeah. Thats what I am talking about. 2.5 down may not be quite as fast as I'd like but that 1.3 upload is sweet. Hamradios, we don't need no stinking ham radios what we need is bandwidth baby.
Great. Just what we need... Another ham hater.
Just try to complete your upload when the neighborhood ham starts operating, or CBer, or any transmission within the passband of BPL. Then you'll be on terminal hold with your ISP/utility company to complain; after all that, you still will have no resolution, nor will you have any upload(nor download, for that matter). Your ISP/utility will not be able to stop the RF in your neighborhood from happening. In fact, if your operations cause interference to us, your pipe will be choked or taken down altogether.
Can't we just stop hating and baiting the hams? -- I once accidentally spilled spot remover on my dog and he disappeared. You know what I hate? Indian Givers... No, I take that back. »www.folsomtech.com |
|
  technick Premium join:2000-12-16 Loganville, GA | I have nothing against HAM, it's actually tasty for christmas, and other seasonal dinners. |
|
  Vamp 5c077 Premium join:2003-01-28 MD
·Verizon FIOS
| reply to kfolsom said by kfolsom : said by NewLife : Hell yeah. Thats what I am talking about. 2.5 down may not be quite as fast as I'd like but that 1.3 upload is sweet. Hamradios, we don't need no stinking ham radios what we need is bandwidth baby.
Great. Just what we need... Another ham hater.
Just try to complete your upload when the neighborhood ham starts operating, or CBer, or any transmission within the passband of BPL. Then you'll be on terminal hold with your ISP/utility company to complain; after all that, you still will have no resolution, nor will you have any upload(nor download, for that matter). Your ISP/utility will not be able to stop the RF in your neighborhood from happening. In fact, if your operations cause interference to us, your pipe will be choked or taken down altogether.
Can't we just stop hating and baiting the hams?
No, ham radio is the past, computers are the future, get over it!! :P -- :: My current desktop :: |
|
  kfolsom Where the fit hits the shan Premium join:2003-01-31 Yucaipa, CA
·Verizon west (ex G..
| reply to technick Re: 2.5/1.3??!
said by technick : I have nothing against HAM, it's actually tasty for christmas, and other seasonal dinners.
I eat ham at all holiday dinners with my family. I wonder if that makes me a cannibal in some way?
I really don't mean to "Rodney King" all over the place. This BPL/radio people war is just going too far. Thanks for lightening the forum a little bit...:D -- I once accidentally spilled spot remover on my dog and he disappeared. You know what I hate? Indian Givers... No, I take that back. »www.folsomtech.com |
|
  kv5e Ride Free Premium join:2001-12-04 Mesquite, TX
| reply to Vamp Digital technology and computers are the rage in ham radio!
Mesh networking on 802.11x under Part 97 rules....Wireless mobile ethernet on 1.2 GHz with DStar, Perceptually coded voice with data interleaved with soft panel interfacing to you PDA or laptop with DStar, ad infinitum.
Yes, there is still the SSB/Voice only Hams, but a lot of new blood is infusing the hobby with programming, hardware, and integration skills.
kv5e |
|
  dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ
| reply to kfolsom said by kfolsom : Can't we just stop hating and baiting the hams?
I AGREE. every one of these BPL stories after the first few posts becomes a ham/antiham squabble. - FWIW i think these speeds were obtained under VERY OPTIMAL CONDITIONS. under real world use you'd probably see levels of service equivelent to charters bronze package(512/128) -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|