n2jtx
join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY
 ·Optimum Online
|  reply to Transmaster
Re: 2.5/1.3??!
said by Transmaster  :
No you won't hear from us here but you will hear from us online. Remember you are a type 15 device so while you will interfere with us, type 15 rules means if we and other
service which use these frequency are harmed you are shut down. In the mean time if any of the stake holders on these
frequencies being type 96 devices can cream, and will cream
your shoot'm dead game and there is nothing you can do about it. Well fellow Hamradio operators do you think this
crap technology will interfer with us if we switch to FM on HF bands?
FM would probably work but the bandwidth waste would be terrible. I do not recall what the absolute minimum NBFM deviation for intelligible audio would be but I think 2.5kHz would be about right. So double that and add another one or two kHz for buffer and we are up to around 7kHz for one voice channel (now that I think of it, i think the minimum "channel" separation on newer NBFM equipment is 6.25kHz). Plus the heterodynes would be a pain as well.
OTOH, if you reside in a BPL infested area, why not switch to RTTY or PSK31 and run a few 10 minute continuous data transmissions with other friendly hams. Perfectly legal.  |
|
kfolsom
Where the fit hits the shan
Premium
join:2003-01-31
Yucaipa, CA
 ·Verizon west (ex G..
| said by n2jtx :
OTOH, if you reside in a BPL infested area, why not switch to RTTY or PSK31 and run a few 10 minute continuous data transmissions with other friendly hams. Perfectly legal.
The part that I think is so germain to this view of fighting BPL (on our own terms) is that we don't even have to do anything out of the ordinary... Just operate as normal and let physics take over.
But your way would work, too...;)
--
I once accidentally spilled spot remover on my dog and he disappeared. You know what I hate? Indian Givers... No, I take that back. »www.folsomtech.com |
|
