Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Purging the Weak Link » common sense
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
16
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
what to do »
« And that's how it should be.  
AuthorAll Replies

sdd75

join:2001-10-14
Maryville, TN


1 edit
common sense

Lease private ip's to all customers initially. (If the ISP does not want the customer to run a server, then that is the easiest way to enforce the rule so to speak. It avoids the touchy issue of account termination.)
It would be hard to relay off a computer that isn't publicly routable.

Perform stateful packet inspection on port 25. Log all outbound requests, and send a weekly email to the customer containing the information. The default address is the customer's primary address. (Viruses don't have to 'relay') This would appear more as a service to the customer rather than aggressive enforcement of vague policy. Offer the customer the option of blocking port 25 at the ISP level. This would allow the person who is actually advertising via email to continue to work. If someone is intentionally sending numrous emails, thus electing to leave port 25 unblocked, the report should include a polite warning that complaints made against the account will be reviewed and will potentially result in an ISP enforced block of port 25 on that account. Hey, the ISP wants to make money too. It does them no good to just cancel accounts.

The customer pays a little extra for a public and static ip. Port 25 is still inspected.

This would require almost zero additional resources.

cbs228
Geeks Of The World, Unite

join:2000-09-04
Saint Louis, MO

There are some protocols which simply don't play nice with NAT, and giving users a non-routable IP address is bound to complicate things. For instance, IM-client file transfers or almost any IM function other than chat might not work. RTSP streams could not be set up for videoconferencing. Customers could not make VPN connections. Although UPnP can mitigate this somewhat, it won't fix everything. Could ISPs even claim to offer internet access, since it wouldn't work as it should? I, for one, would not pay for broken internet service only to pay more to have it unbroken.
--
"If you stare too long into the abyss the abyss stares back at you." -Nietzsche

GENERAL FAILURE READING ©: DRIVE
(A)bort, (R)etry, (F)rivolous Lawsuits, (B)ribe Congress?
Forums » Purging the Weak Linkwhat to do »
« And that's how it should be.  


Sunday, 08-Nov 21:12:53 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Rental modem -> Purchased modem procedure [Comcast HSI]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· for all the bell haters out there. [TekSavvy]