Re: Bottom up security

Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Bottom up security


Share Topic:	RSS topic:	toggle: flat / full normal / watch	Posting:	Post a:	Post a:

Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal

Router LOG question »
« Bloodhound exploit and iessearch toolbar

Link Logger
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
Calgary, AB

·Shaw

I have wondered this myself as to why can't I have one unit that combines my cable modem and router/firewall it only makes sense and certainly reduces the amount of cabling and such (network cable from modem to firewall and one power cable as well, likely save a bit on the power bill as well). I know some ISPs are moving in this direction, but the more the better.

Blake
--
Vendor: Firewall Logging Software »www.SonicLogger.com - SonicWall and 3Com »www.LinkLogger.com - Linksys, Netgear and Zyxel

permalink · 2004-03-19 11:13:11 · Print ·

B Premium,MVM join:2000-10-28	Re: Bottom up security Well, yeah, IF they continue to allow the users fine-grained control of that built in NAT service. Otherwise, if they were to start locking that NAT in place, it's a slippery slope towards a "Port 25 and Port 80/443 Outbound Only" world. -- B -- In a realm outside causality and function
	permalink · 2004-03-19 11:17:14 ·

your comment..

Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security	Router LOG question » « Bloodhound exploit and iessearch toolbar


Thursday, 03-Dec 02:10:37	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. republican-creole page compression OFF