Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Groups Clash Over Muni Ruling » Court ruled on statutory language not munis' merit
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« business as usual  
AuthorAll Replies


boogie74

join:2001-06-19
Neenah, WI
clubs:

reply to bonnyman
Re: Court ruled on statutory language not munis' merit

said by bonnyman See Profile:
The Court handled this as a states' rights decision, not a telecom policy decision.

The Court explicitly stated that they were not ruling on the merits of municipal broadband but whether the language in the 1996 Telecom Act met the legal requirements (as determined by previous court rulings on the U.S. Constitution) for a federal law to preempt state control over their own cities and counties (cities and counties are legally considered to be subdivisions of the state). The majority determined that the Act did not.

Here's the link to the decision -- it can be skimmed pretty quickly by a layman:

»a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422···1238.pdf

How dare you post something true like this? Can't you see that this type of argument is detrimental to the "fundamental right" to complain that when something happens that you don't like or agree with, the only rational reason for it is because the "Corporate Pigs of the World" bought the decision under the table somehow??

Boogie


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

(Boogie, maybe we finally agree on something....)

Actually, I'm just sitting here being amused at everyone getting in high dudgeon over a decision allowing a government to prohibit its subdivisions from doing something.

Apparently, everyone thinks that the Feds should tell the states that they can't do that, which would be a government prohibiting its subdivisions from doing something....

Calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!


boogie74

join:2001-06-19
Neenah, WI
clubs:

said by calvoiper See Profile:
(Boogie, maybe we finally agree on something....)

Actually, I'm just sitting here being amused at everyone getting in high dudgeon over a decision allowing a government to prohibit its subdivisions from doing something.

Apparently, everyone thinks that the Feds should tell the states that they can't do that, which would be a government prohibiting its subdivisions from doing something....

Calvoiper

Exactly! It's getting to the point around here where people are wishing for a "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" and when he gets there and does something that they don't agree with, "Mr. Smith" became a "bribed, career politician"

Boogie
Forums » Groups Clash Over Muni Ruling« business as usual  


Thursday, 10-Dec 12:53:10 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [131] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [74] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [67] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· Will Gearscore die now? [World of Warcraft]
· Icecrown 5-man strats [World of Warcraft]
· 60GB would only last us two days! [TekSavvy]
· ICC10 [World of Warcraft]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· [game] Concept Game [Pub Games]